13 - Polyolefin film–reinforced composites for personal protection

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-461-1.00013-3Get rights and content

Abstract

This chapter describes the use of oriented films of polyolefins in ballistic protective applications. The history of their use in ballistic protective applications is briefly discussed, from early efforts in World War II, through development of stretched melt-blown tape-reinforced polyolefins in the Vietnam War, through solid-state extrusion (SSE) and then SSE with two stage drawing in the 21st century. Current SSE film reinforcements are summarised, and armour performance in ballistic impact is described compared to benchmark materials. Advantages that may be inherent to film-reinforced composites are discussed, including buoyancy, a unique combination of high perforation resistance and low dynamic deflection, high cut resistance and relative ease in attachment. The chapter concludes with suggestions for the heretofore unexplained observation that polyolefin film–reinforced armour composites offer protection per weight far beyond than expected by their specific axial strength, using rules of thumb developed for fibre-reinforced armour composites.

References (0)

Cited by (9)

  • Effects of spacing and ply blocking on the ballistic resistance of UHMWPE laminates

    2021, International Journal of Impact Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some commercial gel-spun fibers/tapes are Honeywell Spectra® (900,1000,3000, WO2011/1137045) and DSM Dyneema® (SK75, SK76) [9]. Examples of solid-state extrusion tapes are Teijin Endumax® [10], Armour Holdings Tensylon® HT, BAE Systems Tensylon® HS and Dupond TensylonTM HM [11]. The solid-state tape has inherently lower strength than the gel-spun fiber/tape due to its grain boundaries.

  • The effect of in-plane shear properties on the ballistic performance of polyethylene composites

    2020, International Journal of Impact Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    To test the hypothesis that back face deformation is influenced by the in-plane shear properties of a material, HB 210 and HB 212 were shot at 220 m/s alongside the Tensylon 30A material. Tensylon 30A features an in-plane shear stiffness 20 times higher than fiber UHMWPE materials [20] and higher flow stress (as shown in Figure 16), but a significantly lower modulus and strength in the principal directions [20], giving a lower limit velocity [7] (and thus, the reduced test velocity). As expected, the Tensylon demonstrates significantly lower BFD and the correspondingly smaller shear strains (as shown in Figure 17c and f) when compared to both fiber reinforced systems (Fig. 17a, b, d, e), whose trend continues at the reduced velocity.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text