Original Contribution
Lung density as measured by computerized tomography: implications for radiotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(82)90587-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Accurate dose calculations for radiotherapy planning require a detailed knowledge of the internal anatomy of the patient both in terms of geometry and density. Computed tomography (CT) is presently the best means of providing these data. Fifty-eight patients who had scans of the thorax for radiotherapy planning were studied. The CT numbers were converted to relative electron densities and average lung densities were obtained for every patient. A linear correlation of lung density with age was found with the mean lung density of 0.35 at an age 5 years and 0.19 at an age of 80. The effect of scanning the patient under full inspiration, full expiration or normal shallow breathing conditions was analyzed. At the age of 5 years the expiration and inspiration average lung densities were 0.36 and 0.20, while at the age of 80 years they were 0.22 and 0.16, respectively. Respiratory volume changes were linearly correlated with changes in relative electron density. Differences in lung density between expiration and inspiration scans were found to demonstrate a similar trend with age as the relationship between vital capacity and age. The dosimetric and the possible clinical implications of lung density measurements for radiotherapy are considered. In particular, dose calculations were performed using scans taken under a number of different respiratory conditions. Doses calculated for a single cobalt-60 beam can differ by more than 25% when comparing a full inspiration scan to a normal breathing scan. A similar comparison for a parallel pair distribution on the lung yields a difference of about 3 % while a typical three field technique for treating cancer of the esophagus shows a difference of nearly 10%.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (97)

  • Impact of lung density on isolated lung tumor dose in VMAT using inline MR-Linac

    2020, Physica Medica
    Citation Excerpt :

    From these studies, it is expected that the lung density varies from 0.1 g/cm3 to 0.3 g/cm3 in lung cancer patients. Lung density affects lung tumor dose [19,22]. Lasse et al. [22] reported that the median tumor dose decreased from 89.2% to 74.9% for 6 MV and from 83.3% to 61.6% for 18 MV, respectively, when changing lung density from 0.4 to 0.1 g/cm3.

  • Geant4 Monte Carlo investigation of the magnetic field effect on dose distributions in low-density regions in magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy

    2019, Physica Medica
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the patient's body, in lowdensity tissues, such as the lung, the electron ranges are longer; hence the influence of the magnetic field strength is greater than in other tissues (e.g. soft tissue). It has been reported that the lung density changes with the patient's age, health condition, and respiratory phase [18,19]. In this study, the influence of the transverse and longitudinal magnetic field strength on dose distributions for various lung densities was quantitatively investigated by comparing the percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles, using the Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code.

  • Lung dose calculation with SPECT/CT for <sup>90</sup>Yittrium radioembolization of liver cancer

    2013, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Actual radiological density depends on patient, scanning timing (perfusion and ventilation phase), scanning position, and the inclusion/exclusion of the circulating blood. Average densities for supine position range from 0.2 to 0.35 g/cm3, depending on patient age (8). Our LMD calculation depends strongly on the actual lung density.

  • Proton pencil beam scanning treatment with feedback based voluntary moderate breath hold

    2020, Medical Dosimetry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Lastly the comparison between the nominal plan and the additional calculations was performed. Prior studies44,45 found that lung density varies from a middle value of 0.10 g/cm3 (for inspiration) to a low of 0.30 g/cm3 (for expiration). The above lower and upper values were roughly 30% lower and higher than the mean value of the 2.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (Canada), the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation.

Medical Physicist.

Radiation Oncologist.

View full text