Elsevier

Hydrometallurgy

Volume 29, Issues 1–3, June 1992, Pages 431-459
Hydrometallurgy

Hydrometallurgical process innovation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(92)90026-VGet rights and content

Abstract

Hydrometallurgy consists of a series of separations that begins with leaching of ores or concentrates and ends with fairly pure, marketable cathodes, powders, or compounds recovered from solution. Intermediate separations are conducted to recover by-products, isolate impurities, or enhance the productivity of subsequent unit operations. There is a constant search for new technologies that will: (1) increase the productivity of parts of the process; (2) reduce operating costs; (3) reduce adverse environmental impact of effluents from the process; and (4) (in the case of the need for new plant capacity) develop new, simpler, cleaner, more economic processes.

Innovations in hydrometallurgy have historically taken the form of: (1) testing new reagents for leaching; (2) acceleratin the rates of leaching and improving the final extractions; (3) offering new options in solvent extraction or ion exchange; (4) incremental improvements in electrowinning and refining; (5) improved methods of making liquid-solid separations that involve better washing and lower water usage; and (6) developing entirely new processes for specific industries (i.e., lead, copper, or refractory gold) that substitute hydrometallurgy for either mineral processing or for pyrometallurgy.

Process innovations in hydrometallurgy, both successful and unsuccessful, are reviewed, and the possibility of developing a strategy for evaluating innovations for their chance of success is discussed. From such a review, it becomes evident that true, novel, successful inventions are the product of a serendipitous, unpredictable, creative process. However, some strategies are revisited that have failed previously, on the basis that their reason for failure may now be obsolete.

References (42)

  • D.S. Davies et al.

    Nitric-sulfuric leach process improvements

    Min. Eng.

    (1981)
  • E. Peters et al.

    Copper recovery from copper concentrates by the UBC-Cominco ferric chloride leach route

  • E.F.G. Milner et al.

    Copper hydrometallurgy

    (1974)
  • A.J. Parker

    Hydrometallurgy of copper and silver in solvent mixtures

    Search

    (1973)
  • P.M. Tyroler et al.

    Hydrometallurgical processing of Inco's carbonyl residue

  • P.J. McGauley et al.

    Process for the recovery of copper from its ores and minerals

    (1951)
  • A. Vizsolyi et al.

    Report for Cominco, Ltd.

    (1969)
  • R. Hackl

    Reduction leaching of chalcopyrite

  • E. Peters et al.

    Iron copper separation by reduction leaching

    (1984)
  • E. Peters et al.

    Reverse leaching of chalcopyrite

  • M.H. Mao et al.

    Acid pressure leaching of chalcocite

  • Cited by (65)

    • Rapid leaching and recovery of valuable metals from spent Lithium Ion batteries (LIBs) via environmentally benign subcritical nickel-containing water over chlorinated polyvinyl chloride

      2020, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, most of these solvents, such as nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid are highly corrosive and hazardous to the environment limiting the application of hydrometallurgy technology in the recycling of spent LIBs (Nayl et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2019). Furthermore, the use of H2O2 as a reducing agent for attaining high leaching efficiency of Li, Co, and other metals also make it a low profitable technology (Dutta et al., 2018; Onyedika et al., 2012; Peters, 1992). Therefore, development of a new cost-effective and eco-friendly technology is urgent need for the recycling of spent LIBs.

    • Chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) assisted leaching of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium-ion battery in subcritical water

      2020, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the use of hydrometallurgy is limited due to the use of corrosive solvents such as sulfuric acid. Furthermore, the use of H2O2 as reducing agent for attaining high leaching efficiency of Li and Co adds to the cost of this technology (Dutta et al., 2018; Onyedika et al., 2012; Peters, 1992). Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a new cost effective and eco-friendly technology for recycling of spent LIBs.

    • A study on zinc recovery from leach solutions using Ionquest 801 and its mixture with D2EHPA

      2012, Minerals Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Zinc sulphide ore has been the major source for zinc production. The process involving Roast–Leach–Electrowin (RLE) has been used to treat this kind of ores (Peters, 1992). With the depletion of zinc sulphide ores, zinc recovery from other type of ores and secondary resources attracts much attention (Rashchi et al., 2005; Gouvea and Morais, 2007; Vahidi et al., 2009; Lewis et al., 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text