Nanoparticle-based dmg delivery systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(91)90040-KGet rights and content

Abstract

Nanoparticles are colloidal polymer particles of a size below 1 μm that are used as carriers for drugs as well as for vaccines. The drugs or antigens may be entrapped in the polymer matrix in particulate form or in the form of a solid solution, or they may be bound to the particle surface by adsorption. In certain cases, the drug also can be bound covalently to the polymer. The drug or antigen may be present during polymerization or may be added to previously produced particles.

A number of preparation methods exist for the manufacture of nanoparticles. These methods include emulsion polymerization, interfacial polymerization, solvent evaporation, and denaturation or desolvation of natural proteins or carbohydrates.

After intravenous injection, nanoparticles like other colloidal drug carriers accumulate in the reticuloendothelial system. This uptake into the reticuloendothelial system can be reduced and the body distribution altered by coating with certain materials such as surfactants. Another way of altering the body distribution is the incorporation of magnetite particles into the nanoparticles and subsequent targeting with a magnetic field.

Other administration routes for nanoparticles include intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, peroral, and ocular administration.

Parenteral administration of a number of cytostatic drugs or antibiotics leads to an enhanced efficacy or reduced toxicity of these drugs, or to both, thus resulting in an improvement of the therapeutic index by binding to nanoparticles.

The binding of vincamine and especially insulin to nanoparticles resulted in an enhancement of the bioavailability after peroral administration.

The elimination rate of nanoparticles from the eye is considerably slower than that of aqueous eye-drop solutions. Probably for this reason, the miosis time and the duration of the intraocular pressure reduction were considerably prolonged after binding of pilocarpine to polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles. The retention ofnanoparticles was greater in inflamed than in normal eyes, indicating a potential for targeting to inflamed tissue.

Poly (methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles are powerful adjuvants for some antigens. These nanoparticles improved the antibody response and the protection against challenge with life virus in comparison to the classical adjuvant aluminium hydroxide using influenza as a model antigen. In addition, the duration of these effects as well as the stability against heat inactivation was improved.

References (63)

  • L. Illum et al.

    The organ uptake of intravenously administered colloidal particles can be altered using a nonionic surfactant (poloxamer 338)

    FEBS Lett.

    (1984)
  • D. Leu et al.

    Distribution and elimination of coated poly(methyl-2-14C-methacrylate) nanoparticles after intravenous injection in rats

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • J. Kreuter et al.

    Distribution and elimination of poly(methyl-2-14C-methacrylate) nanoparticle radioactivity after injection in rats and mice

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1979)
  • J. Kreuter et al.

    Quantitative and microautoradiographic study on mouse intestinal distribution of polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1989)
  • M. Nefzger et al.

    Distribution and elimination of polymethyl methacrylate nanoparticles after peroral administration to rats

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • R.W. Wood et al.

    Ocular disposition of poly-hexyl-2-cyano[3-14C]acrylate nanoparticles in the albino rabbit

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1985)
  • R. Diepold et al.

    Distribution ofpoly-hexyl-2-cyano[3-14C]acrylate nanoparticles in healthy and chronically inflamed rabbit eyes

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1989)
  • E.M. Gipps et al.

    Distribution of polyhexyl cyanoacrylate nanoparticles in nude mice bearing human osteosarcoma

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1986)
  • F. Brasseur et al.

    Actinomycin D adsorbed on polymethylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: Increased efficiency against an experimental tumor

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1980)
  • P. Couvreur et al.

    Toxicity of polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles II: Doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1982)
  • K.J. Widder et al.

    Selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres containing low-dose adriamycin: Total remission in Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats

    Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol.

    (1983)
  • K.J. Widder et al.

    Selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres to the Yoshida sarcoma: Ultrastructural evaluation of microsphere disposition

    Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol.

    (1983)
  • P. Maincent et al.

    Disposition kinetics and oral bioavailability of vincamine-loaded polyalkyl cyanoacrylate nanoparticles

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1986)
  • T. Harmia et al.

    Enhancement of the myotic response of rabbits with pilocarpine-loaded polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1986)
  • J. Kreuter et al.

    Influence of the particle size on the adjuvant effect of paniculate polymeric adjuvants

    Vaccine

    (1986)
  • J. Kreuter et al.

    Influence of hydrophobicity on the adjuvant effect of particulate polymeric adjuvants

    Vaccine

    (1988)
  • J. Kreuter

    Physicochemical characterization of poly-acrylic nanopariicles

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1983)
  • J. Kreuter

    Evaluation of nanoparticles as drug-delivery systems I: Preparation methods

    Pharm. Acta Helv.

    (1983)
  • H. Nothdurft

    Über die Sarkomauslösung durch Fremdkörperimplantation bei Ratten in Abhängigkeit von der Form der Implantate

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1955)
  • H. Nothdurft et al.

    Sarkomerzeugung mit Fensterglas

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1958)
  • N.E. Stinson

    The tissue reaction induced in rats and guinea-pigs by polymethylmethacrylate (acrylic) and stainless steel (18/8/mo)

    Br.J. Exp. Pathol.

    (1964)
  • Cited by (232)

    • Prediction the clinical EPR effect of nanoparticles in patient-derived xenograft models

      2022, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nanoparticles have received substantial attention over the past few decades as tumor-targeting delivery systems because of their promising tumor-targeting ability compared to small-molecule anticancer drugs and imaging agents [1–3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text