Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 16, Issue 8, 1995, Pages 657-661
Biomaterials

In situ polymerization of pyrrole in animal tissue in the formation of hybrid biomaterials

https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)93864-AGet rights and content

Abstract

Porcine pericardium was impregnated with pyrrole or its derivative, sodium 4-(3-pyrrolyl)butanesulphonate (SPBS), by soaking the animal tissue in the monomer. Subsequent in situ chemical polymerization of the monomer-rich tissue using FeCl3 as initiator produced black polypyrrole-tissue hybrid biomaterials. The rate and extent of polymerization was found to be greater in 0.5 m acetic acid than in Hepes-buffered saline (HBS) and also greater for SPBS than for pyrrole. However, better tissue integrity was obtained for polymerization in HBS. Histological examination showed that the monomers do not permeate through the entire tissue, restricting polymerization to the surface layers of the tissue. The samples so formed do not exhibit detectable electrical conductivity.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Conductive polymers: Towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering

    2014, Acta Biomaterialia
    Citation Excerpt :

    PPy–PMAS is a hydrophobic composite with low electrical impedance, and was shown to support the adhesion and proliferation of PC-12 nerve cells [20]. PPy was even combined with animal tissue but, as the monomer was not able to permeate the tissue, it was only deposited on the surface [103,104]. Composites of PANI and polypropylene (PP) were created for neurobiological applications [46].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text