Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90118-6Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper develops the concept of task interdependence and integrates it in the Hackman and Oldham (1976) theory of job design. Two dimensions of initiated task interdependence and received task interdependence are developed as multidimensional concepts, each being made up of the elements of scope, resources, and criticality. A distinction is made between the two psychological states of experienced responsibility for one's own work and personal outcomes, and experienced responsibility for others' (dependents') work and personal outcomes for whom one initiates task interdependence. Autonomy is hypothesized to be related only to experienced responsibility for one's own work outcomes while initiated task interdependence is related to experienced responsibility for others' work outcomes. Initiated interdependence is also hypothesized to be positively related to the affective positive work and personal outcomes, while received task interdependence is negatively related to these variables. New subscales for the measurements of these constructs are developed and reliability and validity coefficients are reported. The substantive results give support to the motivating potential of initiated task interdependence. However, the results do not support the hypotheses associated with received task interdependence. While autonomy was found to be much more strongly related to all the critical psychological states than the Hackman—Oldham theory would predict, job feedback yielded negative results. These findings are discussed by identifying potential areas of future research and extending the concept of interdependence to the wider organizational context.

References (53)

  • J.E. Champoux

    A three sample test of some extensions of the job characteristics model of work motivation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1980)
  • H.F. Crombag

    Cooperation and competition in means-interdependent triads: A replication

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • T.G. Cummings et al.

    Satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation: An extension of Lawler and Hall's factor analysis

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1976)
  • J.W. Driscoll et al.

    The first-level supervisor: Still “the man in the middle”

    Sloan Management Review

    (Winter 1978)
  • M.M. Greller

    Evaluation of feedback sources as a function of role and organizational level

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1980)
  • R.W. Griffin

    Relationships among individual, task design, and leader behavior variables

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1980)
  • J.R. Hackman et al.

    Employee reactions to job characteristics

    Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph

    (1971)
  • R.J. Hackman et al.

    Development of the job diagnostic survey

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1975)
  • J.R. Hackman et al.

    Work redesign

    (1980)
  • D.J. Hickson et al.

    A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1971)
  • C.R. Hinings et al.

    Structural conditions of intraorganizational power

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1974)
  • A.B. Horsfall et al.

    Teamwork and productivity in a shoe factory

  • D.G. Jenkins et al.

    Standardized observations: An approach to measuring the nature of the jobs

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1975)
  • R.W. Kahn et al.

    Organization stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity

    (1964)
  • R.A. Karasek

    Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1979)
  • Cited by (0)

    Funding for the preparation of this manuscript was provided by the faculties of Graduate Studies and Research, and Management, McGill University.

    View full text