The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90054-5Get rights and content

Abstract

A review of the literature revealed that the effects of personal control on intrinsic motivation had not been directly investigated, that the interaction of competence and personal control had not been investigated, and that studies comparing the effects of contingent versus noncontingent reward systems on intrinsic motivation had produced conflicting results and conclusions. A study was designed and conducted using a direct manipulation of personal control over performance as well as the usual reward manipulation. It was found that personal control over performance was a very important determinant of intrinsic motivation but that the type of reward system did not affect intrinsic motivation. An interaction between personal control over performance and competence was found such that both performance and personal control over performance had to be high in order for intrinsic motivation to be high.

References (27)

  • E.L. Deci

    Intrinsic motivation

    (1975)
  • J. Dermer

    The interrelationship of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1975)
  • D. Greene et al.

    Effects of extrinsic reward on children's subsequent intrinsic interest

    Child Development

    (1974)
  • Cited by (163)

    • Avoiding the crowding-out of prosocial motivation in microfinance

      2020, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      If they perceive such information as discouraging, it may reduce their self-confidence and result in lower engagement. If, to the contrary, rewards are perceived as the outcome of a self-determined effort or as supportive, the opposite effect may occur, known as the crowding-in effect (Fang & Gerhart, 2012; Fisher, 1978; Gagné & Deci, 2005). Some studies conclude that rewards have a negative impact on intrinsic motivation (Chervier, Le Velly, & Ezzine-de-Blas, 2019; Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999) while others indicate that this effect is restricted (Cameron & Pierce, 1994), struggle to find any negative overall effect (Cameron, Banko, & Pierce, 2001; García-Amado, Pérez, Escutia, García, & Mejía, 2011; Sen et al., 2017) or highlight a crowding-in effect (Bruni, Pelligra, Reggiani, & Rizzolli, 2019; Sommerville, Milner‐Gulland, Rahajaharison, & Jones, 2010).

    • Continuing professional development in the sports rehabilitation industry: A Chinese case study

      2024, The Lifelong Learning Journey of Health Professionals: Continuing Education and Professional Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by AFOSR Grant No. 76-2873, Robert D. Pritchard, Principal Investigator. A brief version of this paper was presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco, August 1977.

    View full text