Pertinency of an extraneous variable

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(67)90080-XGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (7)

  • I.D.J. Bross

    Spurious effects from an extraneous variable

    J. chron. Dis.

    (1966)
  • A.M. Lilienfeld

    Emotional and other selected characteristics of cigarette smokers and nonsmokers as related to epidemiological studies of lung cancer and other diseases

    J. nat. Cancer Inst.

    (1959)
  • Smoking and Health, Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service, U.S....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (93)

  • An approach to quantifying the potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: A GRADE concept paper

    2021, Environment International
    Citation Excerpt :

    The current GRADE approach to defining such a “large magnitude of effect” takes a precise relative risk (RR) of > 2 as a cut-off value. Based on modelling studies conducted over 50 years ago, this magnitude of effect is considered to be large enough that it is unlikely to be explained by residual confounding (Bross, 1967). When the results of a systematic review based on observational evidence exceeds this threshold, and when the effect is precise and the observational studies do not exhibit other important limitations in study design or execution, the certainty of evidence may be rated up by one level (Guyatt et al., 2011b).

  • The Role of Comparative Effectiveness Research

    2018, Principles and Practice of Clinical Research
  • Case–control matching on confounders revisited

    2023, European Journal of Epidemiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text