Rates of reaction of pyrite and marcasite with ferric iron at pH 2

https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90351-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The relative reactivities of pulverized samples (100–200 mesh) of 3 marcasite and 7 pyrite specimens from various sources were determined at 25°C and pH 2.0 in ferric chloride solutions with initial ferric iron concentrations of 10−3 molal. The rate of the reaction: FeS2 + 14Fe3+ + 8H2O = 15Fe2+ + 2SO2−4 + 16H+ was determined by calculating the rate of reduction of aqueous ferric ion from measured oxidation-reduction potentials. The reaction follows the rate law: −dmFe3+dt = k(AM)mFe3+ where mFe3+ is the molal concentration of uncomplexed ferric iron, k is the rate constant and AM is the surface area of reacting solid to mass of solution ratio. The measured rate constants, k, range from 1.0 × 10−4 to 2.7 × 10−4 sec−1 ± 5%, with lower-temperature/early diagenetic pyrite having the smallest rate constants, marcasite intermediate, and pyrite of higher-temperature hydrothermal and metamorphic origin having the greatest rate constants. Geologically, these small relative differences between the rate constants are not significant, so the fundamental reactivities of marcasite and pyrite are not appreciably different.

The activation energy of the reaction for a hydrothermal pyrite in the temperature interval of 25 to 50°C is 92 kJ mol−1. This relatively high activation energy indicates that a surface reaction controls the rate over this temperature range. The BET-measured specific surface area for lower-temperature/early diagenetic pyrite is an order of magnitude greater than that for pyrite of higher-temperature origin. Consequently, since the lower-temperature types have a much greater AM ratio, they appear to be more reactive per unit mass than the higher temperature types.

References (30)

  • B.J Evans et al.

    The 57Fe Mossbauer parameters of pyrite and marcasite with different provenances

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1982)
  • D.K Nordstrom

    Thermochemical redox equilibria of ZoBell's Solution

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1977)
  • J.D Rimstidt et al.

    The kinetics of silica-water reactions

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1980)
  • F Basalo et al.

    Mechanisms of Inorganic Reactions: A study of metal complexes in solution

  • F.T Caruccio

    An evaluation of factors affecting acid mine drainage production and the ground water interactions in selected areas of Western Pennsylvania

  • F.T Caruccio

    The quantification of reactive pyrite by grain size

  • C.S Clark

    Oxidation of coal mine pyrite

  • D.W Dana

    The System of Mineralogy, Vol. I. Elements, Sulfides, Sulfosalts. Oxides

    (1944)
  • M Fleisher

    Minor elements in some sulfide minerals

    Econ. Geol. Fiftieth Anniv. Vol.

    (1955)
  • R.M Garrels et al.

    Oxidation of pyrite by iron sulfate solutions

    Amer. Jour. Sci

    (1960)
  • G.S Gibbons

    Optical amsotropy in pyrite

    Amer Mineral.

    (1967)
  • A.E Harvey et al.

    Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of iron (II) and total iron with 1,10-Phenanthroline

    Anal. Chem.

    (1955)
  • D.R Kester et al.

    Redox reactions and solution complexes of iron in marine systems

  • R.L.P Kleinmann et al.

    Biogeochemistry of acid mine drainage and a method to control acid formation

    Mining Engineering

    (1981)
  • D Langmuir

    Eh-pH determination

  • Cited by (147)

    • Water-oxygen interaction on marcasite (1 0 1) surface: DFT calculation

      2022, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both marcasite and pyrite are iron sulfides, but they have distinct mineralogical properties, chemical reactivity, and oxidation kinetics. Because of its orthogonal lattice, marcasite was considered less stable than cubic pyrite [35]. Elsetinow et al. [36] synthesized marcasite films under vacuum conditions and investigated the reactivity of marcasite in an oxidizing environment.

    • Oxidative dissolution of hydrothermal mixed-sulphide ore: An assessment of current knowledge in relation to seafloor massive sulphide mining

      2017, Ore Geology Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sphalerite is shown to consistently oxidise throughout the early stages of dissolution in the presence of pyrite at pH 6, evidenced by increasing Zn concentrations throughout with concentrations remaining consistent or falling slightly after day 50. Other important factors include Fe3+ (Antonijević et al., 1997; Dimitrijevic et al., 1996; McKibben and Barnes, 1986), Fe2+ (Garrels and Thompson, 1960; Moses and Herman, 1991; Rimstidt and Vaughan, 2003), impact of stirred/unstirred conditions (Chandra and Gerson, 2010; Holmes and Crundwell, 2000; Wiersma and Rimstidt, 1984), and Eh (which is correlated with dissolved oxygen (DO) and Fe3+) (Chandra and Gerson, 2010; Williamson and Rimstidt, 1994). As discussed earlier, mixed sulphide minerals and the potential for galvanic coupling highlight the significance of electrochemical processes (Chandra and Gerson, 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 935 Gravier St., New Orleans, LA 70112.

    View full text