Elsevier

Carbon

Volume 23, Issue 6, 1985, Pages 723-729
Carbon

A comparison of O2 and CO2 oxidation of glassy carbon surfaces

https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(85)90234-9Get rights and content

Abstract

We have separated and studied with surface spectroscopies the dissociative adsorption step from the CO formation step in the O2 and CO2 gasification of glassy carbon. The reactive adsorption probabilities decreased with increased coverage. Differences between O2 and CO2 were apparent at high oxygen coverages where the dissociative adsorption probability at 300°C for CO2 drops below 10−14, which is orders of magnitude less than that of O2. Estimates for the activation energy for dissociative adsorption at high coverage are 32 kcal/mol for O2 and 50–60 kcal/mol for CO2. We have examined the thermal stabilities of the resultant oxidized surfaces that yield desorption energies and provide quantitative information about the product formation step in gasification reactions. A substantial fraction of the oxygen on the carbon surface is very stable with CO formation energies of >80 kcal/mol. The energies decrease as a function of increasing oxygen coverage and at high coverages decrease below 70 kcal/mol. The energetics of CO formation from lattice carbon limit the rate of gasification by CO2. The increased gasification activity for O2 is associated with a more facile gaseous dissociation step causing higher oxygen coverages, which in turn generates lower energy CO formation sites.

References (24)

  • P.L. Walker et al.

    Adv. Catalysis

    (1959)
  • N.M. Laurendeau

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (1978)
  • J.B. Donnet

    Carbon

    (1982)
  • L.R. Radovic et al.

    Fuel

    (1983)
  • S.B. Tong et al.

    Carbon

    (1982)
  • P.J. Hart et al.

    Carbon

    (1967)
  • R.C. Bansal et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1970)
  • M. Barber et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1973)
  • S.R. Kelemen et al.

    Surface Sci.

    (1984)
  • R.O. Lussow et al.

    Carbon

    (1967)
  • P.L. Walker et al.

    Fundamentals of Gas Surface Interactions

  • R. Schlogl et al.

    Carbon

    (1983)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Coupling CH<inf>4</inf> pyrolysis with CO<inf>2</inf> activation via reverse Boudouard reaction in the presence of O<inf>2</inf> through a multifunctional catalyst Ni-V-Li/Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>

      2016, Journal of CO2 Utilization
      Citation Excerpt :

      The sequence observed of CO and CO2 formation could be rather related to a modification in the coke rather than in the catalyst during the cycles. The amount of oxygenated species on the coke increases during TOS, thus contributing to the full coke combustion into CO2 [42]. TPR measurements were carried out in fresh and spent catalyst, as presented in Fig. 3.

    • Vanadium and alumina modified with groups I and II elements for CO<inf>2</inf> and coke reaction under fluid catalytic cracking process

      2015, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
      Citation Excerpt :

      12CO would be favored when reaction temperature increases, as observed. Kelemen et al. [14] in a comprehensive work on glassy carbon surfaces showed that the energy barrier for CO release decreases when oxygen coverage on carbon increases, yet differences between CO2 and O2 were apparent at high oxygen coverage. During RB reaction on pure CO2 the 12CO/12CO2 ratio in the most active catalyst (V-K/Al2O3) was lower than in K/Al2O3.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text