Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 410, Issue 2, 5 May 1987, Pages 299-308
Brain Research

Assessment of spinal cord injury by counting corticospinal and rubrospinal neurons

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90328-3Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper describes an objective, quantifiable technique for assaying the degree of severity of spinal cord injury. Twenty-one rats underwent a C7-T1 laminectomy: 12 received a C8 spinal cord clip compression injury with forces of either 2.3, 16.9 or 53.0 g; 4 had cord transection at C8, and 5 had no cord lesion. Postoperative clinical neurological assessment was performed by the inclined plane method. At 4 weeks, the spinal cord-injured rats underwent a T10 transection and insertion of a Gelfoam pledget impregnated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). HRP was similarly administered to 9 normal rats. Longitudinal sections of the spinal cord encompassing the injury site were stained with Luxol fast blue, and coronal sections from the cerebrum and midbrain were processed for HRP reactivity with tetramethylbenzidine. Labelled corticospinal and rubrospinal neurons were counted in every 6th section to derive a cortical score (CS) and a red nucleus score (RNS) for each animal. The CS reflected the extent of the pathological changes at the site of cord injury and the In CS decreased linearly with increasing injury severity (P < 0.0001). In contrast, the RNS was only reduced in animals with severe (53.0 g) cord injuries (P < 0.0006). The degree of preservation of the dorsal columns including the corticospinal tracts at the injury site correlated with the CS, whereas the RNS was related to the degree of preservation of the lateral columns. Counts of rubrospinal neurons, but not corticospinal neurons, correlated closely (r = 0.96, P < 0.001) with the inclined plane results, suggesting the importance of non-pyramidal tracts in controlling gross motor function. Thus, counting corticospinal and rubrospinal neurons is an objective, reliable test of the severity of experimental spinal cord injury.

Reference (52)

  • AbercrombieM.

    Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections

    Anat. Rec.

    (1946)
  • AfeltA.

    Functional significance of ventral descending tracts of the spinal cord in the cat

    Acta Neurobiol. Exp.

    (1974)
  • AllenA.R.

    Remarks on the histopathological changes in the spinal cord due to impact. An experimental study

    J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.

    (1914)
  • ArmitageP.

    Statistical Methods in Medical Research

    (1976)
  • BalentineJ.D.

    Pathology of experimental spinal cord trauma. The necrotic lesion as a function of vascular injury

    Lab. Invest.

    (1978)
  • BennettM.H. et al.

    Experimental decompression of spinal cord

    Surg. Neurol.

    (1977)
  • BrownL.T.

    Projections and terminations of the corticospinal tract in rodents

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1971)
  • BrownL.T.

    Rubrospinal projections in the rat

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1974)
  • DeekeL. et al.

    Neurophysiological assessment of afferent and efferent conduction in the injured spinal cord of monkeys

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1973)
  • DohrmannG.J. et al.

    The microvasculature in transitory traumatic paraplegia. An electron microscopic study in the monkey

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1971)
  • DolanE.J. et al.

    A new method for testing the force of clips for aneurysms or experimental spinal cord compression

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1979)
  • DonoghueJ.P. et al.

    The motor cortex of the rat: cytoarchitecture and microstimulation mapping

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1982)
  • DraperN.R. et al.

    Families of transformation

  • DuckerT.B. et al.

    Pathological findings in acute experimental spinal cord trauma

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1971)
  • EidelbergE. et al.

    A model of spinal cord injury

    Surg. Neurol.

    (1976)
  • EidelbergE. et al.

    Anatomical correlates of return of locomotor function after partial spinal cord lesions in cats

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text