Regular paper
Recognition of liposomes by cells: In vitro binding and endocytosis mediated by specific lipid headgroups and surface charge density

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(92)90086-2Get rights and content

Abstract

We investigated the interaction of liposomes of different surface properties with two mammalian cell lines, CV1, as African green monkey kidney cell line, and J774, a murine macrophage-like cell line. Cell surface binding and endocytosis of liposomes were quantified by fluorometry, using the liposome-encapsulated pH-sensitive fluorescent dye, pyranine, and the lipid marker rhodamine-PE. The liposome uptake was dependent both on the surface properties of the liposomes and on the cell line. Negatively charged phospholipids incorporated into egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) / cholesterol (C) (2:1) liposomes were recognized by the two cell lines to different extents depending on the lipid headgroup and its charge density in the liposome bilayer. Inclusion of 9% phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), or phosphatidic acid (PA) promoted the uptake by CV1 cells more than 20-fold, Increasing the content of these negatively charged lipids beyond 9% did not further enhance the uptake. In contrast, 9% monosialoganglioside GM1, phosphatidylinositol (PI), or phosphatidylethanolamine conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-PE) did not promote the uptake. Inclusion of 9% PS, PG, PA or PI in PC/C liposomes did not enhance the uptake by J774 cells, but a drastic enhancement was observed when increasing concentrations of these anionic lipids were incorporated in the liposome bilayer. At least 50% PS, PG, or PI was needed to reach the level of uptake seen with CV1 cells. The uptake of liposomes containing 50% PS by J774 cells was inhibited by poly-anioms which are the competing ligands for scavenger receptors, but the uptake by CV1 was not inhibited. Different mechanisms of liposome uptake by these two cell lines are suggested from the different patterns of uptake and the competition with various poly-anions. The differences observed in the uptake rate of liposomes with different lipid compositions seemed to be primarily due to the differences in the binding between liposomes and cell membrane components. The in vitro interaction of various liposomes with these cell lines, especially CV1 cells, shows significant similarities to the in vivo clearance rates of the liposomes.

References (81)

  • R.T. Fraley et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1980)
  • A. Huang et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1987)
  • A.L. Klibanov et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1990)
  • G. Blume et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1990)
  • R.M. Straubinger et al.

    Cell

    (1983)
  • K. Hong et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1983)
  • D.L. Daleke et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1990)
  • P.M. Brown et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1990)
  • T.D. Heath et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • K. Nishikawa et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1990)
  • F. Olson et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1979)
  • F. Szoka et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1980)
  • G.R. Bartlett

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1959)
  • J. Dijkstra et al.

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1984)
  • F. Bonte et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lipids

    (1986)
  • J. Dijkstra et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1991)
  • A.J. Schroit et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lipids

    (1986)
  • R.L. Juliano et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1975)
  • J. Senior et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • N.M. Wassef et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1991)
  • A.J. Schroit et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1985)
  • R.V. McDaniel et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1986)
  • M. Langner et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1990)
  • A. Gabizon et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Acta

    (1992)
  • M.J. Hsu et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1982)
  • I. Pastan et al.

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1983)
  • A. Helenius et al.

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1983)
  • F. Roerdink et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1983)
  • N.M. Wassef et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1987)
  • D. Papahadjopoulos et al.

    Nature (Lond.)

    (1974)
  • G. Gregoriadis et al.

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (1972)
  • E. Mayhew et al.
  • E. Mayhew et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1976)
  • A. Rahman et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1980)
  • G. Lopez-Berestein et al.

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (1983)
  • F. Szoka et al.

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (1987)
  • G. Lopez-Berestein et al.

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (1985)
  • G. Lopez-Berestein et al.
  • Cited by (206)

    • Comparison of the uptake mechanisms of zwitterionic and negatively charged liposomes by HeLa cells

      2020, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, for efficient drug delivery, the details of the receptors and mechanisms involved in nanocarriers uptake need to be determined, since they can strongly affect delivery efficiency. At a broader level, it is interesting to notice that a relatively small difference in the head group of one of the lipids used for the formulation of these liposomes, which otherwise are highly similar (same size, same cholesterol amount, same dioleoyl chains), can have such profound effects not only on the amount and identity of proteins adsorbed once in contact with serum, as well as on uptake efficiency,27–30,38,50 but also on the subsequent mechanisms of uptake by cells. Liposome charge itself affects uptake efficiency, as observed when adding the liposomes to cells in artificial serum-free conditions (Supplementary Figure S2), where the different compositions is reflected on the very different zeta potential (as shown in Figure 1, B for liposomes in DPBS).

    • Tuning liposome composition to modulate corona formation in human serum and cellular uptake

      2020, Acta Biomaterialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the contrary, the kinetics of uptake of the anionic DOPC/G and DOPG liposomes differed strongly, with much higher uptake levels in the first few hours (with the fully anionic DOPG liposomes showing the highest uptake), followed by a progressive decrease in the average cell fluorescence, converging to similar levels for the two formulations over 24 h. Zwitterionic objects are known to bind less to cells in comparisons to charged particles, thus it is generally observed that increasing particle charge can improve their uptake efficiency. For instance, Lee et al. [39] found that the endocytosis of anionic liposomes including phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylserine (PS) or phosphatidic acid (PA) was faster and more efficient than for zwitterionic liposomes. Allen et al. also observed that for several liposomes (e.g. liposomes containing PS or various gangliosides) the uptake efficiency in bone marrow macrophages in vitro was positively correlated with the clearance by the reticuloendothelial system observed in vivo [40].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text