Elsevier

Archives of Oral Biology

Volume 39, Issue 11, November 1994, Pages 955-965
Archives of Oral Biology

An electromyographic analysis of orofacial motor activities during trained tongue-protrusion and biting tasks in monkeys

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90079-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This study sought to characterise the electromyographic (EMG) activity patterns of orofacialmuscles during trained tongue-protrusion and biting tasks in two awake monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Chronic or acute EMG electrodes were placed in the anterior digastric (DIG), genioglossus (GG), masseter (MASS), platysma (PLAT), zygomaticus major (ZYGO), orbicularis oris superior (OOS), and orbicularis oris inferior (OOI) muscles and their EMG activity as well as the force signals of the tongue-protrusion and biting tasks were recorded. A total of 327 tongue-protrusion task trials and a total of 210 biting-task trials were successfully completed in several recording sessions and the EMG patterns were generally consistent between the different sessions. For the tongue task, the mean onset time of increase in GG activity significantly (p < 0.0001) led the mean onset time of increase in the force. The DIG, GG, and OOI (and also the OOS in one of the monkeys) showed a significant (p < 0.0001) increase in mean EMG amplitude during the holding phase, but the GG in both monkeys had the highest mean EMG amplitude ratio (MAR), i.e. the mean EMG amplitude during the holding or dynamic phase divided by the mean EMG amplitude during the pre-trial period. A similar EMG pattern was documented for different directions of the tongue-protrusion task (right, symmetrical, and left) and changes in the levels of EMG activities occurred in GG and OOI as the direction of the tongue-protrusion task changed from left to right. The task at different forces was associated with no apparent change in MAR for the holding phase for each muscle recorded. However, during the dynamic phase, only the GG showed a significant increase in EMG activity as the forces were increased. For the biting task, the mean onset times of the MASS activity and force were not significantly different. The MASS and ZYGO muscles (and the PLAT in one of the monkeys) showed a significant increase in mean EMG amplitude during the holding phase compared with the pre-trial period, and the MASS showed the highest MAR. It was also the only muscle showing a significant increase in the EMG activity when the bite-force level was increased. These findings reveal that certain orofacial muscles are selectively recruited during the two different orofacial tasks. Based on the EMG activity pattern during different directions or force levels of the task, the data suggest that, of the muscles recorded, the principal agonist for the tongue task is the GG and that for the biting task is the MASS; the other muscles that may be active appear to serve as accessories to the task.

References (65)

  • B.J. Sessle et al.

    Jaw movement-related activity and reflexly induced changes in the lateral pterygoid muscle of monkey (Macaca fascicularis)

    Archs oral Biol.

    (1982)
  • A.J. Thexton et al.

    Tongue movement of the cat during lapping

    Archs oral Biol.

    (1988)
  • A.J. Thexton et al.

    Tongue movement in the cat during the intake of solid food

    Archs oral Biol.

    (1989)
  • T.M.G.J. Van Eijden et al.

    Coactivation of jaw muscles: Recruitment order and level as a function of bite force direction and magnitude

    J. Biomech.

    (1990)
  • W.W. Wood

    Medial pterygoid muscle activity during chewing and clenching in man

    J. prosthet. Dent.

    (1986)
  • S. Abd-El-Malek

    The part played by the tongue in mastication and deglutition

    J. Anat.

    (1955)
  • J. Ahlgren

    Mechanisms of mastication

    Acta odont. scand.

    (1966)
  • G.A. Bennett et al.

    Experimental studies on the movements of the mammalian tongue, II the protrusion mechanism of the tongue

    Ant. Rec.

    (1946)
  • T.S. Buchanan et al.

    Characteristics of synergic relation during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • K.E. Byrd et al.

    Contour analysis of masticatory jaw movements and muscle activity in Macaca mulatta

    Am. J. phys. Anthrop.

    (1981)
  • K.E. Byrd et al.

    Human and macaque mastication: a quantitative study

    J. dent. Res.

    (1978)
  • R.W. Clark et al.

    Recruitment order, contractile, characteristics, and firing patterns of motor units in the temporalis muscle of monkeys

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1978)
  • O. De Sousa

    Estudo electromiogrfico do m. platysma

    Folia clin. Biol.

    (1964)
  • H. Devlin et al.

    Bite force and masseter muscle electromyographic activity during onset of an isometric clench in man

    Archs oral Biol.

    (1980)
  • R.W. Doty et al.

    An electromyographic analysis of reflex deglutition

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1956)
  • R. Dubner et al.
  • E.L. DuBrul
  • T. Gay et al.

    An electromyographic analysis of jaw movements in man

    Electromyogr. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • A.P. Georgopoulos et al.

    Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1981)
  • L.J. Goldberg et al.

    Relationship among recruitment order, spike amplitude, and twitch tension of single motor units in human masseter muscle

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1977)
  • G.C. Gorniak et al.

    Quantitative assay of electromyograms during mastication in domestic cat (Felis catus)

    J. Morph.

    (1980)
  • P. Grant

    Biomechanical analysis of the masticatory apparatus of rhesus macaque (Primate; Macaca mulatta)

  • Cited by (6)

    • The neurobiology of swallowing and dysphagia

      2008, Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
    View full text