Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Estimation of Soil Erosion Using Open-Access Earth Observation Data Sets and Erosion Potential Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Water Conservation Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soil erosion is a physical process and considered as worldwide environmental problem. The present study aims to investigate spatial-temporal distribution of soil loss using Erosion Potential Model (EPM) in Mitrovica region (Kosova) in last 18 years (2000–2018). The precipitation, temperature, topography, geology, and land use/land cover layers were considered as input into the model. The model was implemented on annual basis for years 2000 and 2018. The hypsometric analysis was performed using Calhypso pulgin available in QGIS in order to understand the different stages of the watershed. In addition, the water retention curve of the region was also developed to understand the potential of soil to store the water. The validation was made through the regular field checks and surveys. In year 2000, the minimum and maximum soil loss was observed as 100 and 2000 m3/km2/year, respectively. In year 2018, the minimum and maximum detachment of soil volume was reported as 150 and 2200 m3/km2/year, respectively. Furthermore, the present study demonstrates the potential application of EPM in data scare regions like Mitrovica region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adhikary PP, Chakraborty D, Kalra N, Sachdev C, Patra A, Kumar S, Tomar R, Chandna P, Raghav D, Agrawal K (2008) Pedotransfer functions for predicting the hydraulic properties of Indian soils. Soil Research 46:476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anache AAJ, Flanagan CD, Srivastava A, Wendland EC (2018) Land use and climate change impacts on runoff and soil erosion at the hillslope scale in the Brazilian Cerrado. Sci Total Environ 622–623:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anees MT, Abdullah K, Nawawi MNM, Norulaini NAN, Syakir MI, Omar AKM (2018) Soil erosion analysis by RUSLE and sediment yield models using remote sensing and GIS in Kelantan state, Peninsular Malaysia. Soil Res 56(4):356–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Avdan U and Jovanovska E (2016) Algorithm for automated mapping of land surface temperature using Landsat 8 satellite data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Journal of Sensors

  5. Blinkov I (2012) An approach for conversion of erosion data produced by EPM method inweight measure. In International Conference On Land Conservation–Landcon

  6. Choudhari PP, Nigam GK, Singh SK, Thakur S (2018) Morphometric based prioritization of watershed for groundwater potential of Mula river basin, Maharashtra, India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 2(4):256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2018.1452482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Cesare G, Beyer Portner N, Boillat J and Scleiss A (1998) Modelling of erosion andsedimentation based on field investigation in Alpine reservoirs of hydropower schemes. German Coastal Engineering Research Council, parallel session 34

  8. De Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issue and semiquantitative models. Earth Sci Rev 71:95–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vente J, Poesen J, Bazzzoffi B, Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G (2006) Predicting catchment sediment yield in Mediterranean environments: the importance of sediment sources and connectivity in Italian drainage basins. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:1017–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dragicevic N (2016) Model for erosion intensity and sediment production assesment based on erosion potential method modification. University of Rijeka. Faculty of Civil Engineering

  11. Efthimiou N, Lykoudi E, Panagoulia D and Karavitis C (2016) Assessment of soilsusceptibility to erosion using EPM and RUSLE models: the case of Venetikos river catchment. Global NEST Journal. Vol 18

  12. Elhag M, Kojchevska T, Boteva S (2019) EPM for soil loss estimation in different geomorphologic conditions and data conversion by using GIS. World Multidisciplinary Earth Science Symposium. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emmanouloudis D and Filippidis E (2002) A quantitative estimation model of mountainous watershed degradation. Kick-off workshop on IAHS, Decade of prediction in ungaugedbasins (PUB) - Hydrological Science on Mission. Brazil

  14. Emmanouloudis D, Christou O and Filippidis E (2003) Quantitative estimation of degradation in the Aliakmon river basin using GIS. Erosion Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Integrating Methods and Techniques. IAHS Publication, 279, 234

  15. Eskelmann W, Baritz R, Bialousz S, Bielek P, Carre F, Houskova B, Jones RJA, Kibblewhite MG, Kozak J, Le Bas C, Toth G, Toth T, Varallyay G, Yli Halla M, Zupan M (2006) Coomon criteria for risk area identification according to soil threats. EUR 22185 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fannetti D, Vezzoli L (2007) Sediment input and evolution of lacustrine deltas: The Breggia and Greggio rivers case study (Lake Como, Italy). Quat Int 173-174(SUPPL):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gavrilovic S (1962) A method for estimating the average annual quantity of sedimentsaccording to the potency of erosion. Fac For 26:151–168 (In Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gavrilovic, S. 1970. Modern ways of calculating the torrential sediment and erosion mapping. In: Erosion, Torrents and Alluvial Deposits. Yugoslav Committee for International Hydrological decade, Belgrade. p. 85–100. (In Serbian).

  19. Gavrilovic S (1972) Engineering of torrens and erosion. Journal of Construction (Special Issue), Belgrade, Yugoslavia (In Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gavrilovic Z (1988) The use of empirical method (Erosion Potential Method) for calculating sediment production and transportation in unstudied or torrential streams. In: White WR (ed) International Conference on River Regime. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 411–422

    Google Scholar 

  21. Globevnik L, Holjevic D, Petkovesk G, Rubinic J (2003) Applicability of the Gavrilovic method in erosion calculation using spatial data manipulation. Erosion Prediction in Ungaunged Basins; Integrating Methods and Techniques. IAHS Publication 279. pp 334–233

  22. Kalinderis I, Sapountzis M, Stathis D, Tziaftani F, Kourakli P and Stefanidis P (2009) The risk of sedimentation of artificial lakes, following the soil loss and degradation process in the wider drainage basin. Artificial lake of Smokovo case study (Central Greece). International Conference LANDCON 0905 “Global Change-Challenges for soil management-from degradation-through soil and water conservation-to sustainable soil management”, Tara Mountain, Serbia

  23. Kirkby MJ, Irvine BJ, Jones RJA, Govers G, the PESERA Team (2008) The PESERA coarse scale erosion model for Europe. I.-Model rationale and implementation. Eur J Soil Sci 59:1293–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kostadinov K, Braunovci S, Gragicevic S, Zlatic M, Dragovic N, Rakonjac N (2018) Effects of erosion control work: case study – Grdelica Gorge, the South of Morava River (Serbia). Water

  25. Kumar N, Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Narsimlu B (2017) SWAT model calibration and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction of the Tons river basin, India, using sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2) algorithm. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0306-z.s

  26. Kumar N, Singh SK, Pandey HK (2018a) Drainage morphometric analysis using open access earth observation datasets in a drought-affected part of Bundelkhand, India. Appl Geomatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0218-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar N, Singh SK, Singh VG, Dzwairo B (2018b) Investigation of impacts of land use/land cover change on water availability of tons River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 4:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar M, Denis DM, Singh SK, Szabo S, Suryavanshi S (2018c) Landscape metrics for assessment of land cover change and fragmentation of a heterogeneous watershed. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 10(2018):224–233

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lazarevic R (1968) Erosion in the Gvozdacka river basin – supplement to the instructions for erosion map elaboration. Bull Serbian Geogr Soc 49(2):75–98 (In Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lazarevic R (1985) The new method for erosion coefficient determination – Z. Erosion Prof Factsheet 13:54–61 (In Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luo W, Harlin JH (2003) Theoretical travel time based on watershed hypsometry. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maliqi E, Penev P (2018) Monitoring of vegetation change by using RS and GIS techniquesin Mitrovica, Kosovo. J Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 1:1–13 Clausius Scientific Press, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  33. Markose VJ, Jayappa KS (2011) Hypsometric analysis of Kali River Basin, Karnataka, India, using geographic information system. Geocarto Int 26:553–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2011.608438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Milevski I (2015) An approach of GIS based assessment of soil erosion rate on country level in the case of Macedonia. Physical Geography; Cartography; Geogrphic Information Systems & Spatial planing. pp 97–104

  35. Milevski I, Ivanova E (2013) Erosion potential modeling of the territory of municipalities Pehchevo and Simitli using remote sensing data. 9th Scientific Conference with International Participation. 20 - 22 November. Sofia, Bulgaria

  36. Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S, Meena PK, Mishra PK, Shukla R (2015) Impact of climate change on future soil erosion in different slope, land use, and soil-type conditions in a part of the Narmada River Basin, India. J Hydrol Eng 20(6):C5014003–1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murmu P, Kumar M, Lal D, Sonker I, Singh SK (2019) Delineation of groundwater potential zones using geospatial techniques and analytical hierarchy process in Dumka district, Jharkhand, India. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O'Neal MR (2004) Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: A review. J Soil Water Conserv 59(1):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  39. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburgerb K, Alewellb K, Lugatoa E, Montanarellaa L (2015a) Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy 48(2015):38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Ballabio C, Lugato E, Meusburger K, Montanarella L, Alewell C (2015b) The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in. Eur Environ Sci Policy 54(2015):438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J (2019) Soil loss due to crop harvesting in the European Union: a first estimation of an underrated geomorphic process. Sci Total Environ 664(2019):487–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Petras J, Kuspilic N, Kunstek D (2005) Some experience on the prediction of suspended sediment concentrations and fluxes in Croatia. Proceedings of Symposium SI held during the Seventh IAHS Scientific Assembly at Foz do Igacu, Brazil. IAHS 292:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pike RJ, Wilson SE (1971) Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geol Soc Am Bull 82:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rafaelli S, Peviani M and Perez Ayala F (1998) Study of sediment yield on the mountain Cuence del Rio Iruya (Argentina). IARH AMH, Hydraulic XVIII Latin American Conference, Oaxaca, Mexico. (In Spanish)

  45. Rawat KS, Singh SK (2018) Appraisal of soil conservation capacity using NDVI Model-based C Factor of RUSLE Model for a semi arid ungauged watershed: a case study. Water Conserv Sci Eng 3(1):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-018-0042-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rawat KS, Singh SK, Pal RK (2019) Synergetic methodology for estimation of soil moisture over agricultural area using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-1 satellite data. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Renard K, Foster G, Weesies G, McCool D, Yoder D (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Agricultural Handbook No. 703, 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203739358-5

  48. Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller IR (2002) Process geomorphology. McGraw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sharma SK et al (2013) Use of geographical information system in hypsometric analysis of Kanhiya Nala watershed. Int J Remote Sens Geosci 2:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  50. Simunek J, Sejna M, Van Genuchten MT (1998) The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Version2.0. IGWMC-TPS-70. Int. Ground Water Modeling Ctr., Colorado School of Mines, Golden

  51. Simunek J, Van Genuchten MT, Sejna M (2005) The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Version3.0. HYDRUS Softw.Ser.1. Dep. Of Environ. Sci., Univ. of California, Riverside

  52. Staut M (2004) Recent erosional processes in the catchment of the Dragonja river. Published thesis. Faculty of Arts. University of Ljubljana. (In Serbian)

  53. Stefanidis P, Myronidis D, Sapountzis M, Stathis D (1998) The torrent “Sklitrho” in Florina. Torrential Environment and torrent control system. Scientific Annals. Department of forestry and natural environment. Aristot Univ Thessaloniki 41(2):1275

    Google Scholar 

  54. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 39–76

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sivakumar V et al (2011) Hypsometric analysis of Varattaru river basin of Harur taluk, Dharmapuri districts, Tamilnadu, India using geomatics technology. Int J Geomatics Geosci 2:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  57. Szabó G, Singh SK, Szabó S (2015) Slope angle and aspect as influencing factors on the accuracy of the SRTM and the ASTER GDEM databases. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 83–84:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Thakur JK, Singh SK, Ekanthalu VS (2016) Integrating remote sensing, geographic information systems and global positioning system techniques with hydrological modeling. Appl Water Sci:1–14

  59. Thieken H, Lucke A, Diekkruger B, Richter O (1999) Scaling input data by GIS forhydrological modelling. Hydrol Process 13(4):611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Thiemann D (2006) Detection and assessment of erosion and soil erosion risk in the watershed of the Bilate river-southern Ethiopian rifft valley. Ph.D. Thesis. Freie University Berlin. Institute for Geographic Sciences. Berlin, Germany

  61. Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Vogt V, Colombo R, Bertolo F (2003) Deriving drainage networks and catchmentboundaries; a new methodology combining digital elevation data and environmental characteristics. Geomorfology 53(3-4):281–298

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agric Handb 537(537):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR039i002p00285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wosten J, Pachepsky YA, Rawls W (2001) Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J Hydrol 251:123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yadav SK, Singh SK, Gupta M, Srivastava PK (2014) Geocarto International. Morphometric analysis of Upper Tons basin from Northern Foreland of Peninsular India using CARTOSAT satellite and GIS, Geocarto International. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2013.868043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yadav SK, Dubey A, Szilard S, Singh SK (2016) Prioritisation of sub-watersheds based on earth observation data of agricultural dominated northern river basin of India. Geocarto Int 33(4):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zemljic M (1971) Calculation of sediment load. Evaluation of vegetation as anti-erosive factor. Proceedings of the international symposium Interpraevent. Villach, Australia. (In French)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author Edon Maliqi’s grateful to the Prof. Dr. Petar Penev for supervising his Ph.D at the University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy; Department of Photogrametry and Cartography; Sofia, Bulgaria. As well as, Mr. Maliqi would like to thank to Prof.Dr. Ivica Milevski from Ss. Cyrill and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhir Kumar Singh.

Ethics declarations

There is no compliance with ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maliqi, E., Singh, S.K. Quantitative Estimation of Soil Erosion Using Open-Access Earth Observation Data Sets and Erosion Potential Model. Water Conserv Sci Eng 4, 187–200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00078-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00078-1

Keywords

Navigation