Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between the braided bar and adjacent channel during flood: a case study of a sand-bed braided river, Brahmaputra–Jamuna

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The braided river is characterized by numerous bars which exhibit chaotic nature and add uncertainty to understand and prediction of the river network. The development of these bars may be affected by several factors like boundary conditions, forcing and non-linear physical processes. Here, in this research, some prevailing physical processes which may affect the growth of bar after its emergence have been examined. Then, attempts have been made to identify the relationships between the bars and their adjacent channels. For this purpose, a two-dimensional-depth-averaged morphodynamic model, Delft3D was used to study the interaction between the braided bar and adjacent channel during a flood in a compound bar dominated area at a large sand-bed braided river-Brahmaputra–Jamuna. The results showed that the 2D model can reproduce the major physical processes which are responsible for the growth of the bar. The study showed that the size and shape of the bars were dependent on the characteristics of the adjacent channels. The occurrence of chute channel over the bartop during the flood depends on the depth of flow over the bar during the flood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore P (1982) Laboratory modelling of gravel braided stream morphology. Earth Surf Process Landf 7(3):201–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore P (1991) How do gravel-bed rivers braid? Can J Earth Sci 28(3):326–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth PJ, Best JL, Roden JE et al (2000) Morphological evolution and dynamics of a large, sand braid-bar, Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Sedimentology 47:533–555. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.2000.00305.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth P, Smith GS, Best J, Bridge JS, Sn Lane, Lunt IA, Thomas RE (2011) Evolution and sedimentology of a channel fill in the sandy braided South Saskatchewan Riverand its comparison to the deposits of an adjacent compound bar. Sediment 58(7):1860–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoldi W, Zanoni L, Miori S et al (2009a) Interaction between migrating bars and bifurcations in gravel bed rivers. Water Resour Res https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007086

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoldi W, Zanoni L, Tubino M (2009b) Planform dynamics of braided streams. Process Landf 34(4):547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best J, Ashworth P, Bristow C, Roden J (2003) Three-dimensional sedimentary architecture of a large, mid-channel sand braid bar, Jamuna River. Bangladesh. J Sediment Res 73(4):516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best J, Woodward J, Ashworth P, Smith G (2006) Bar-top hollows: a new element in the architecture of sandy braided rivers. Sediment Geol 190(1–4):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluck BJ (1979) Structure of coarse grained braided stream alluvium. Trans R Soc Edinb 70:181–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge JS (1993) The interaction between channel geometry, water flow, sediment transport and deposition in braided rivers. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 75:13–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church M, Jones D (1982) Channel bars in gravel-bed rivers. In: Hey R, Bathurst J, Thorne C (eds) Gravel-bed rivers. Wiley, New York, pp 291–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Deltares (2009) Delft3D-FLOW user manual: simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments, Technical report

  • Egozi R, Ashmore P (2009) Experimental analysis of braided channel pattern response to increased discharge. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 114:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner FM (1925) On the interaction between water and sediment in rivers. Akad Wiss Wien Math Naturwiss Klasse 134:165–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici B, Paola C (2003) Dynamics of channel bifurcations in noncohesive sediments. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001434

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici B, Seminara G (2003) On the convective nature of bar instability. J Fluid Mech 487:S0022112003004737. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003004737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y (1989) Bar and channel formation. In: Ikeda S, Park G (eds) River meanders. American Geophysical Union Water Resources, Washington DC, pp 417–462

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Muramoto Y (1982) Experimental study on stream channel in Alluvial rivers. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst 32:49–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A (2007) Large rivers: geomorphology and management. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Ikeda S (1984) Prediction of alternate bar wavelength and height. J Hydraul Eng 110:371–386. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:4(371)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda S, Parker G (1989) River meandering. Water Resour Monogr 12. Am Geophys Union 12:379–416

    Google Scholar 

  • ISPAN (1995) The Dynamic Physical and Human Environment of the Riverine Charlands and Charland, Socioeconomic RRA reports for the Brahmaputra–Jamuna, Meghna, Ganges and Padma rivers, and the Charland

  • Kabir MR, Ahmed N (1996) Bed shear stress for sediment transportation in the River Jamuna. J Civ Eng Inst Eng Bangladesh 24:55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans MG, van den Berg JH (2011) River channel and bar patterns explained and predicted by an empirical and a physics-based method. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:721–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1957) River channel patterns: braided, meandering and straight. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 282B:39–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser GR, Roelvink JA, van Kester JATM, Stelling GS (2004) Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model. Coast Eng 51:883–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley MP (1983) Response of braided rivers to changing discharge. J Hydrol (New Zealand) 22:18–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1976) On the cause and characteristic scales of meandering and braiding in rivers. J Fluid Mech 76:457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112076000748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetto R (2000) Unit processes in braided rivers. University of Genova, Genova

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust BR (1978) Depositional models for braided alluvium. In: Miall AD (ed) Fluvial sedimentology. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoirs, pp 605–626

  • Schuurman F, Marra WA, Kleinhans MG (2013) Physics-based modeling of large braided sand-bed rivers: bar pattern formation, dynamics, and sensitivity. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118:2509–2527. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman F, Kleinhans MG, Middelkoop H (2016) Network response to disturbances in large sand-bed braided rivers. Earth Surf Dyn 4:25–45. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-25-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shampa, Ali MM (2014) Development of bars in a large sand bed braided rivers. In: Viollet P-L (eds) Small scale morphological evolution of coastal, estuarine and river systems. Société Hydrotechnique de France, Nantes, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Shampa, Ali MM (2015) Numerical modeling of bar dynamics of a sand-bed braided river. In: 5th International conference on water and flood management, pp 41–52

  • Smith ND (1977) Some comments on terminology for bars in shallow rivers. Fluv Sedimentol (Ed AD Miall) 5:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne C (1982) Processes and mechanisms of river bank erosion. In: Hey RD, Bathurst JC, Thorne CR (eds) Gravel-bed rivers. Wiley, Chichester, pp 227–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn LC (1984) Sediment transport: bed load transport. J Hydraul Eng 110:1431–1456. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:9(1187)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Wegen M, Roelvink JA (2008) Long-term morphodynamic evolution of a tidal embayment using a two-dimensional, process-based model. J Geophys Res Ocean 113:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003983

    Google Scholar 

  • Welber M, Bertoldi W, Tubino M (2012) The response of braided planform configuration to flow variations, bed reworking and vegetation: the case of the Tagliamento River, Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf 37:572–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS (1992) River mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is research is funded by the first author’s M.Sc. research by the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). The authors express their thanks to Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) and Centre for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS) for their immense support in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shampa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shampa, Ali, M.M. Interaction between the braided bar and adjacent channel during flood: a case study of a sand-bed braided river, Brahmaputra–Jamuna. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 5, 947–960 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0269-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0269-x

Keywords

Navigation