Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CO2 Emissions and Development Indicators: a Causality Analysis for Bangladesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to check the dynamic linkages between CO2 emissions and development indicators (per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP), population density, and urbanisation) of Bangladesh. Using annual data in IPAT model for the period of 1972–2015, we have applied Johansen co-integration and Granger causality tests to examine the long-run co-integration and short-run dynamics of the concerned variables. The obtained results reveal that there is bidirectional causality between CO2 emissions and urbanisation, and CO2 emissions and GDP per capita for the study period in Bangladesh. This implies that GDP growth and urbanisation process are the major sources of CO2 emissions in the country. Therefore, policy makers should take extreme care in designing and implementing the environmental protection policies to curb CO2 emissions with a desired level of economic growth and urbanization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected south Asian countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1142–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Mia MAH, Uddin GS (2014) Ozturk I (2014) Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MJ, Begum IA, Buysse J, Huylenbroeck GV (2012) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and the economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: CO-integration and dynamic causality analysis. Energy Policy 45:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, Henni HM, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in middle Esat and north African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee PK, Rahman M (2012) Some determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Bangladesh. Int J of Green Econ 6(2):205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: the Turkish case. Int J of Energy Econ and Policy 4(3):484–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JH, Huang YF (2013) The study of the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth. J of Int and Glob Econ Studies 6(2):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner B (1972) The environmental cost of economic growth. In: Population. Resources and the Environment. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 339–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J of the Amer Stat Association 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emissions: a panel data based co-integration analysis. Ecological Econ 57(2):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science, New Series 171:1212–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1972) Impact of Population Growth in Population. Resources and the Environment. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp 365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle F, Robert F, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Rejeb JB (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel data for MENA region. Int J of Ener Econ and Policy 2(2):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller WA (1976) Introduction to statistical time series. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebremariam ND (2016) Examining the impact of driving factors of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions using the STIRPAT model: the case of Ethiopia. Lund University Research Paper Series, School of Economics and Management

  • Gunter BG (2010) The Impact of Development on CO2 Emissions: A Case Study for Bangladesh until 2050. Bangladesh development research working paper series, No. 10 (November 2010); available at: http://www.bangladeshstudies.org/files/WPS_no10.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2018

  • Hamilton C, Turton H (2002) Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Energy Policy 30:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren JP, Ehrlich PR (1974) Human population and the global environment. Am Sci 62(3):282–292

  • Hossain S (2012) An econometric analysis of energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carb Econ 3:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BN, Hwang MJ, Yang CW (2008) Causal relationship among energy consumption, GDP growth and CO2 emissions level revisited: a dynamic panel data approach. Ecological Econ 67:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HwangJ HS, Yoo H (2014) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: evidence from Indonesia. Qual Quant 48:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9749-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Source: www.ipcc-data.org. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  • Islam F, Shahbaz M (2012) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Bangladesh? Utah Valley University, Comsats Institute of Information Technology. (working paper)

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of co-integration vectors. J of Econ Dyn and Control, North Holland 12:231–254

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bull of Econ and Stat 52:169–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean HH, Smyth R (2009) Carbon consumption, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. In: Discussion paper DEVDP 09–13. Business and Economics, Monash University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Zhao D, Merinova D (2009) Analysis of environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Env Imp Assess Rev 29: 341-347. Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eiar. Accessed 20 Jan 2018

  • Mbarek M B, Saidi K, Rahman M M (2017) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth in Tunisia. Qual Quant 52(3):1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0506-7

  • Mercan M, Karakaya E (2015) Energy consumption economic growth carbon emissions: dynamic panel co-integration for selected OECD countries. Procedia Econ and Fin 23:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra G, Giri AK (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from India. The Emp Econ and Quan Letters 4(1):17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh W, Lee K (2004) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission in Korea: testing the causality relation. J of Policy Model 26:973–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastpipatkula P, Panthamita N (2011) The impact of population on CO2 emissions: provincial panel evidence from Thailand. Thailand Econ Society 3(3):258–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbi F, Akbar D, Kabir SMZ (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions: a co-integration analysis for Bangladesh. Int J of Energy Econ and Policy 5(1):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM (2017) Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Kashem MA (2017) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL co-integration and Granger causality analysis. Energy Policy 110:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Mamun SAK (2016) Energy use, international trade and economic growth Nexus in Australia: new evidence from an extended growth model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:806–816

  • Rahman MM, Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2017) The effects of population growth, environmental quality and trade openness on economic growth: a panel data application. J of Econ Studies 44(3):456–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razak MIM, Ahmad I, Bujang I, Talib AH, Ibrahim Z (2013) IPAT- fuzzy model in measuring air pollution: evidence from Malaysia. Amer Int J of Cont Research 3(6):62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of economic growth and energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep 1:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Rahman MM, Amamri M (2017) The causal nexus between economic growth and energy consumption: new evidence from global panel of 53 countries. Sust Cities and Soc 33:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargan JD (1964) Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: a study in econometric methodology. In: Hart PE, Mills G, Whittaker JK (eds) Econometric analysis for National Economic Planning. Butterworth, London

  • Shahbaz M, Jalil, A, Dube, S (2010) Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): Time Series Evidence from Portugal. MPRA Paper No. 50601

  • Shahbaz M, Kumar M, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth Nexus: statistical experience in NEXT 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar C, Mukhopadhay K (2016) Impact of population on carbon emission: lessons from India. Asia-Pacific Dev J 23(1):105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK (2011) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from India. J of Int Bus and Economy 12(1):85–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin G A, Alam K, Gow J (2016) Estimating the major contributors to environmental impacts in Australia. J of Ecological Econ and Stat 37(1):1–14. ISSN 0973–1385 (print); 0973–7537 (online)

  • WDI (2016) World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Weina D, Gilli M, Mazzanti M, Nicolli F (2014). Green inventions and greenhouse gas emission dynamics: a close examination of provincial Italian data. SEEDS working paper 30/2014

  • Wolde-Rufael Y, Menyah K (2010) Nuclear energy consumption and economic development in nine development countries. Energy Econ 32(3):550–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mafizur Rahman.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

APPENDIX 1

Table 7 Summary of literature on the nexus between CO2 emissions, income, urbanisation and population density

APPENDIX 2

1.1 Unit Root or Stationarity Tests

Based on a regression equation with a constant and trend, the augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is formed as follows:

$$ \varDelta {\mathrm{X}}_{\mathrm{t}}={\mathrm{a}}_1+{\mathrm{a}}_2\mathrm{t}+{\mathrm{bX}}_{\mathrm{t}-1}+\sum \limits_{i=1}^k{\uprho}_{\mathrm{i}}\varDelta {\mathrm{X}}_{\mathrm{t}-1}+{\upvarepsilon}_{\mathrm{t}\kern0.75em } $$
(9)

where, ∆Xt = Xt - Xt-1 and X is the variable under study, k denotes the lag number of the dependent variable, chosen by Schwarz criterion, and εt represents the error term. The null hypothesis of a unit root is that b in the above equation is zero. Fuller (1976) provided cumulative distribution of the ADF statistics, indicating that if the calculated value of the coefficient is less than the critical value of the Fuller Table, then X is stationary. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the series is stationary, and hence to confirm stationarity, no differencing in the series is necessary. The Phillips and Perron (1988) test also justified this result. Their unit root tests differ from ADF test mostly in how they deal with autocorrelation and heteroscadasticity in errors. Generally, the ADF test uses a parametric autoregression to estimate the ARMA structure of the errors. The PP test based on the regression function is as follows:

(10)

where t is I(0) and may be heteroscadastic. The PP test has power to correct the autocorrelation and heteroscadasticity in the errors t of the test regression modifying the test statistics directly. Thus, PP unit root and the ADF tests are for the null hypothesis that a time series Xt is I(1). In contrast, stationarity test is for the null hypothesis that Yt is I(0).

APPENDIX 3

Table 8 Correlogram Q-Statistics test
Table 9 Correlogram square residuals test
Table 10 Heteroskedasticity test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey
Table 11 Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM test
Fig. 2
figure 2

CUSUM test

Fig. 3
figure 3

CUSUM of square test

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashem, M.A., Rahman, M.M. CO2 Emissions and Development Indicators: a Causality Analysis for Bangladesh. Environ. Process. 6, 433–455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00365-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00365-y

Keywords

Navigation