Abstract
This paper aims to check the dynamic linkages between CO2 emissions and development indicators (per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP), population density, and urbanisation) of Bangladesh. Using annual data in IPAT model for the period of 1972–2015, we have applied Johansen co-integration and Granger causality tests to examine the long-run co-integration and short-run dynamics of the concerned variables. The obtained results reveal that there is bidirectional causality between CO2 emissions and urbanisation, and CO2 emissions and GDP per capita for the study period in Bangladesh. This implies that GDP growth and urbanisation process are the major sources of CO2 emissions in the country. Therefore, policy makers should take extreme care in designing and implementing the environmental protection policies to curb CO2 emissions with a desired level of economic growth and urbanization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected south Asian countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1142–1153
Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Mia MAH, Uddin GS (2014) Ozturk I (2014) Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:1–11
Alam MJ, Begum IA, Buysse J, Huylenbroeck GV (2012) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and the economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: CO-integration and dynamic causality analysis. Energy Policy 45:217–225
Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, Henni HM, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in middle Esat and north African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349
Banerjee PK, Rahman M (2012) Some determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Bangladesh. Int J of Green Econ 6(2):205–215
Buzkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: the Turkish case. Int J of Energy Econ and Policy 4(3):484–494
Chen JH, Huang YF (2013) The study of the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth. J of Int and Glob Econ Studies 6(2):45–61
Commoner B (1972) The environmental cost of economic growth. In: Population. Resources and the Environment. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 339–363
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J of the Amer Stat Association 74:427–431
Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emissions: a panel data based co-integration analysis. Ecological Econ 57(2):167–181
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science, New Series 171:1212–1217
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1972) Impact of Population Growth in Population. Resources and the Environment. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp 365–377
Engle F, Robert F, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276
Farhani S, Rejeb JB (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel data for MENA region. Int J of Ener Econ and Policy 2(2):71–81
Fuller WA (1976) Introduction to statistical time series. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Gebremariam ND (2016) Examining the impact of driving factors of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions using the STIRPAT model: the case of Ethiopia. Lund University Research Paper Series, School of Economics and Management
Gunter BG (2010) The Impact of Development on CO2 Emissions: A Case Study for Bangladesh until 2050. Bangladesh development research working paper series, No. 10 (November 2010); available at: http://www.bangladeshstudies.org/files/WPS_no10.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
Hamilton C, Turton H (2002) Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Energy Policy 30:63–71
Holdren JP, Ehrlich PR (1974) Human population and the global environment. Am Sci 62(3):282–292
Hossain S (2012) An econometric analysis of energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carb Econ 3:92–105
Huang BN, Hwang MJ, Yang CW (2008) Causal relationship among energy consumption, GDP growth and CO2 emissions level revisited: a dynamic panel data approach. Ecological Econ 67:41–54
HwangJ HS, Yoo H (2014) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: evidence from Indonesia. Qual Quant 48:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9749-5
IPCC (2018) Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Source: www.ipcc-data.org. Accessed 11 Apr 2018
Islam F, Shahbaz M (2012) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Bangladesh? Utah Valley University, Comsats Institute of Information Technology. (working paper)
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of co-integration vectors. J of Econ Dyn and Control, North Holland 12:231–254
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bull of Econ and Stat 52:169–211
Lean HH, Smyth R (2009) Carbon consumption, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. In: Discussion paper DEVDP 09–13. Business and Economics, Monash University, Australia
Lin S, Zhao D, Merinova D (2009) Analysis of environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Env Imp Assess Rev 29: 341-347. Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eiar. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
Mbarek M B, Saidi K, Rahman M M (2017) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth in Tunisia. Qual Quant 52(3):1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0506-7
Mercan M, Karakaya E (2015) Energy consumption economic growth carbon emissions: dynamic panel co-integration for selected OECD countries. Procedia Econ and Fin 23:587–592
Mohapatra G, Giri AK (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from India. The Emp Econ and Quan Letters 4(1):17–32
Oh W, Lee K (2004) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission in Korea: testing the causality relation. J of Policy Model 26:973–981
Pastpipatkula P, Panthamita N (2011) The impact of population on CO2 emissions: provincial panel evidence from Thailand. Thailand Econ Society 3(3):258–267
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346
Rabbi F, Akbar D, Kabir SMZ (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions: a co-integration analysis for Bangladesh. Int J of Energy Econ and Policy 5(1):45–53
Rahman MM (2017) Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:506–514
Rahman MM, Kashem MA (2017) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL co-integration and Granger causality analysis. Energy Policy 110:600–608
Rahman MM, Mamun SAK (2016) Energy use, international trade and economic growth Nexus in Australia: new evidence from an extended growth model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:806–816
Rahman MM, Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2017) The effects of population growth, environmental quality and trade openness on economic growth: a panel data application. J of Econ Studies 44(3):456–474
Razak MIM, Ahmad I, Bujang I, Talib AH, Ibrahim Z (2013) IPAT- fuzzy model in measuring air pollution: evidence from Malaysia. Amer Int J of Cont Research 3(6):62–69
Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153
Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of economic growth and energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep 1:62–70
Saidi K, Rahman MM, Amamri M (2017) The causal nexus between economic growth and energy consumption: new evidence from global panel of 53 countries. Sust Cities and Soc 33:45–56
Sargan JD (1964) Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: a study in econometric methodology. In: Hart PE, Mills G, Whittaker JK (eds) Econometric analysis for National Economic Planning. Butterworth, London
Shahbaz M, Jalil, A, Dube, S (2010) Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): Time Series Evidence from Portugal. MPRA Paper No. 50601
Shahbaz M, Kumar M, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth Nexus: statistical experience in NEXT 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48
Sikdar C, Mukhopadhay K (2016) Impact of population on carbon emission: lessons from India. Asia-Pacific Dev J 23(1):105–132
Tiwari AK (2011) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from India. J of Int Bus and Economy 12(1):85–122
Uddin G A, Alam K, Gow J (2016) Estimating the major contributors to environmental impacts in Australia. J of Ecological Econ and Stat 37(1):1–14. ISSN 0973–1385 (print); 0973–7537 (online)
WDI (2016) World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington D.C
Weina D, Gilli M, Mazzanti M, Nicolli F (2014). Green inventions and greenhouse gas emission dynamics: a close examination of provincial Italian data. SEEDS working paper 30/2014
Wolde-Rufael Y, Menyah K (2010) Nuclear energy consumption and economic development in nine development countries. Energy Econ 32(3):550–556
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX 2
1.1 Unit Root or Stationarity Tests
Based on a regression equation with a constant and trend, the augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is formed as follows:
where, ∆Xt = Xt - Xt-1 and X is the variable under study, k denotes the lag number of the dependent variable, chosen by Schwarz criterion, and εt represents the error term. The null hypothesis of a unit root is that b in the above equation is zero. Fuller (1976) provided cumulative distribution of the ADF statistics, indicating that if the calculated value of the coefficient is less than the critical value of the Fuller Table, then X is stationary. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the series is stationary, and hence to confirm stationarity, no differencing in the series is necessary. The Phillips and Perron (1988) test also justified this result. Their unit root tests differ from ADF test mostly in how they deal with autocorrelation and heteroscadasticity in errors. Generally, the ADF test uses a parametric autoregression to estimate the ARMA structure of the errors. The PP test based on the regression function is as follows:
where t is I(0) and may be heteroscadastic. The PP test has power to correct the autocorrelation and heteroscadasticity in the errors t of the test regression modifying the test statistics directly. Thus, PP unit root and the ADF tests are for the null hypothesis that a time series Xt is I(1). In contrast, stationarity test is for the null hypothesis that Yt is I(0).
APPENDIX 3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kashem, M.A., Rahman, M.M. CO2 Emissions and Development Indicators: a Causality Analysis for Bangladesh. Environ. Process. 6, 433–455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00365-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00365-y