Skip to main content
Log in

Meropenem Dosing Based on a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Model in Elderly Patients with Infection of the Lower Respiratory Tract

  • short communication
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Meropenem is used for the treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Objective

We evaluated the clinical benefits of a strategy of meropenem dosing based on a population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) model in elderly patients with an LRTI.

Methods

In this prospective single-center open-label randomized controlled trial, 79 elderly patients with an LRTI caused by Gram-negative bacilli were randomized to a study group (SG) or a control group (CG). The latter received meropenem according to a regimen decided by the attending physician. The SG received individualized meropenem therapy with a dosing strategy based on software developed from a meropenem population PK/PD model. The primary endpoint was clinical response to meropenem therapy. Secondary endpoints were the amount of antibiotics used and bacteriologic response.

Results

Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common pathogen (32.9%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.4%) and Escherichia coli (17.7%). A total of 63 (79.7%) patients achieved clinical success. Prevalence of clinical success was significantly higher in the SG than in the CG (89.7 vs. 70.0%; p = 0.029). The daily dose of meropenem was significantly lower in the SG than in the CG (1.5 vs. 2.0 g; p = 0.017). A total of 52 (65.8%) patients experienced bacteriologic success, the median duration of meropenem therapy was 9 days, and the median total dose of meropenem was 18.0 g. There were no significant differences between the groups in these parameters.

Conclusions

A strategy for meropenem dosing based on a population PK/PD model can improve clinical response and avoid overtreatment in elderly patients with an LRTI.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01944319.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Craig WA. The pharmacology of meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(Suppl 2):S266–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou QT, He B, Zhang C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in elderly chinese with lower respiratory tract infections: population pharmacokinetics analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling and clinical pharmacodynamics study. Drugs Aging. 2011;28(11):903–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kees MG, Minichmayr IK, Moritz S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous infusion in surgical ICU patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(3):307–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramon-Lopez A, Allen JM, Thomson AH, et al. Dosing regimen of meropenem for adults with severe burns: a population pharmacokinetic study with Monte Carlo simulations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(3):882–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goncalves-Pereira J, Silva NE, Mateus A, et al. Assessment of pharmacokinetic changes of meropenem during therapy in septic critically ill patients. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;15:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Muro T, Sasaki T, Hosaka N, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of meropenem in Japanese adult patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36(2):230–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macvane SH, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Characterizing in vivo pharmacodynamics of carbapenems against Acinetobacter baumannii in a murine thigh infection model to support breakpoint determinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):599–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Frippiat F, Musuamba FT, Seidel L, et al. Modelled target attainment after meropenem infusion in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia: the PROMESSE study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(1):207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fehér C, Rovira M, Soriano A, et al. Effect of meropenem administration in extended infusion on the clinical outcome of febrile neutropenia: a retrospective observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(9):2556–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Byl B, Jacobs F, Roucloux I, et al. Penetration of meropenem in lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(3):681–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections: full version. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(Suppl 6):E1–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(4):388–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-third informational supplement. M100-S23. Wayne: CLSI; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts JA, Paul SK, Akova M, et al. DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(8):1072–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dulhunty JM, Roberts JA, Davis JS, et al. Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in severe sepsis: a multicenter double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(2):236–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Davis JS, et al. Continuous versus intermittent β-Lactam infusion in severe sepsis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(6):681–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdul-Aziz MH, Sulaiman H, Mat-Nor MB, et al. Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1535–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsala M, Vourli S, Kotsakis S, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of meropenem against VIM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: clinical implications. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65(3):211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cojutti P, Maximova N, Pea F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion meropenem in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(9):5535–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pai MP, Cojutti P, Pea F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion meropenem in overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients with stable and unstable kidney function: a step toward dose optimization for the treatment of severe gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(9):933–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaruratanasirikul S, Kositpantawong N, Jullangkoon M, et al. Pharmacodynamics of meropenem in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013;96(10):1283–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim A, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment with standard and prolonged-infusion antibiotic regimens for empiric therapy in adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther. 2009;31(11):2765–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li C, Du X, Kuti JL, et al. Clinical pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(5):1725–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bei He.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by the Capital Medical Development Research Foundation (project number 2009-2025).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 343 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, QT., He, B., Shen, N. et al. Meropenem Dosing Based on a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Model in Elderly Patients with Infection of the Lower Respiratory Tract. Drugs Aging 34, 115–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-016-0431-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-016-0431-9

Keywords

Navigation