Skip to main content
Log in

Can CRM Flexibility Raise Bank Efficiency?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes practices of customer-driven services applied in the leading Russian bank to avoid the impact of financial sanctions (2014–2019). We show how economic sanctions and strict national policies triggered this bank to increase flexibility in customer care to attract more capital from their existing clients. The project comprised three stages: (1) to analyse requirements and to develop “as-is” state of processes; (2) to analyse best practices and to improve processes under the scope of flexibility and customer orientation; (3) to implement the new vision in “to-be” state and final verification. At the third research stage to assess the results of processes improvement in the bank within a year we have applied a set of methods based on data envelopment analysis which provides a multidimensional understanding of processes and new scopes of customer’s value profiles. We have found that process reengineering result could give the contribution already at the first month of implementation and argue the findings could be used to introduce flexible data-driven customer care and improve customer-related processes in organisations worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Central Bank of Russia statistics

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Source: CBR (http://www.cbr.ru/Eng/statistics/ [Accessed: 22.09.2016]), Banki.ru (http://www.banki.ru/banks/ratings/ [Accessed: 22.09.2016])

Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CAR = Tier One Capital + Tier Two CapitalRisk Weighted Assets: CAR weights bank’s credit exposures according to their risk.

  2. Meaning the bankruptcy of several banks: INTERCOMMERZ, SVYAZNOY and ROSINTERBANK early that year.

  3. http://www.banki.ru/banks/ratings/http://www.banki.ru/ [Accessed: 18.08.2016].

  4. http://www.cbr.ru/Eng/statistics/ [Accessed: 21.08.2016].

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2005, August). Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the banking industry. EFA 2005 Moscow meetings.

  • Anna, K., & Nikolay, K. (2015). Survey on Big Data analytics in public sector of Russian Federation. Procedia Computer Science,55, 905–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., Aggarwall, V., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis,21(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera, A. K., Nayak, N. C., & Das, H. C. (2015). Performance measurement in banking and software firm: An empirical research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,16(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Bonime, S. D., Goldberg, L. G., & White, L. J. (2001). The dynamics of market entry: The effects of mergers and acquisitions on entry in the banking industry.

  • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research,98(2), 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, T. (2007). Can superior CRM capabilities improve performance in banking? Journal of Financial Services Marketing,12(2), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Hababou, M., & Tuenter, H. J. (2000). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis,14(3), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., & Mehdian, S. (1990). Efficiency in the commercial banking industry, a production frontier approach. Applied Economics,22(4), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquad, M. A. H., Ravi, V., & Raju, S. B. (2012). Analytical CRM in banking and finance using SVM: A modified active learning-based rule extraction approach. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management,6(1), 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, M., & Raju, V. (2019). Want to Stay the Market Leader in the Era of Transformative Marketing? Keep the Customers Satisfied!. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(3), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fungáčová, Z., Solanko, L., & Weill, L. (2011). Market power in the Russian banking industry. Economie internationale,4, 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorian, D., & Manole, V. (2002). Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition: an application of data envelopment analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (2850).

  • Gromoff, A., Bilinkis, Y., & Kazantsev, N. (2017). Business architecture flexibility as a result of knowledge-intensive process management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromoff, A., Kazantsev, N., & Bilinkis, J. (2016). An approach to knowledge management in construction service-oriented architecture. Procedia Computer Science,96, 1179–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromoff, A., Kazantsev, N., Kozhevnikov, D., Ponfilenok, M., & Stavenko, Y. (2012). Newer approach to create flexible business architecture of modern enterprise. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,13(4), 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromoff, A., Kazantsev, N., Schumsky, L., & Konovalov, N. (2014, June). Business transformation based on cloud services. In 2014 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC) (pp. 844–845).

  • Gromoff, A., Kazantsev, N., Shapkin, P., & Shumsky, L. (2014, August). Automatic business process model assembly on the basis of subject-oriented semantic process mark-up. In: 2014 11th international conference on e-business (ICE-B) (pp. 158–164).

  • Grover, P., & Kar, A. K. (2017). Big data analytics: A review on theoretical contributions and tools used in literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(3), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive,12(4), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarov, M., Kazantsev, N., & Grevtsov, M. (2014, July). Increasing the adoption of social collaboration software. In 2014 IEEE 16th conference on business informatics (Vol. 2, pp 54–59).

  • Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A., Margaritis, D., & Staikouras, C. (2012). Profit efficiency in the European Union banking industry: A directional technology distance function approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis,37(3), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S. (2019). Role of continuity, specificity and frequency of firm-supplier exchanges in customer fulfilment: Evidence from Latin America. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(Suppl 1), S25–S37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenow, A., Bauer, C., & Strauss, C. (2014). Social crowd integration in new product development: Crowdsourcing communities nourish the open innovation paradigm. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,15(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review,63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riivari, J. (2005). Mobile banking: A powerful new marketing and CRM tool for financial services companies all over Europe. Journal of Financial Services Marketing,10(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance,9(2), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Service productivity management: Improving service performance using data envelopment analysis (DEA). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soteriou, A. C., & Stavrinides, Y. (2000). An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches. The International Journal of Bank Marketing,18(5), 246–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S. K., Sushil., & Sharma, M. K. (2019). Managerial paradox toward flexibility: Emergent views using thematic analysis of literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(4), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli, A., Schlagwein, D., & Schoder, D. (2017). Open strategy: Literature review, re-analysis of cases and conceptualisation as a practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,26(3), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zineldin, M. (2005). Quality and customer relationship management (CRM) as competitive strategy in the Swedish banking industry. The TQM Magazine,17(4), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zineldin, M., & Bredenlöw, T. (2001). Performance measurement and management control positioning strategies, quality and productivity: A case study of a Swedish bank. Managerial Auditing Journal,16(9), 484–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina V. Vladimirova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6 and 7.

Table 5 Input and output variables defined. Dataset for DEA
Table 6 Result of first stage DEA calculation result
Table 7 Cleaned from bond impact DEA calculation results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konovalov, N., Gromoff, A., Vladimirova, A.V. et al. Can CRM Flexibility Raise Bank Efficiency?. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 21, 101–112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00232-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00232-y

Keywords

Navigation