Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vocal Fold Paresis 2020

  • Neurolaryngology (AJ McWhorter and L Adkins, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Although the clinical significance of vocal fold paresis is generally acknowledged among specialists, details of evaluation and diagnosis remain highly debated.

Recent Findings

Many studies evaluating vocal fold paresis have been performed in the last two decades; most are retrospective and fraught with methodological concerns. Diagnosis and management of paresis remain founded primarily on experience and opinion with little high-quality evidence to support clinical practice.

Summary

Universally agreed-upon standards for diagnosis remain elusive. Most laryngologists diagnose paresis by laryngoscopic or stroboscopic signs, despite acknowledged interrater inconsistencies. Laryngeal electromyography has the potential to be a valuable diagnostic adjunct, although not immune to similar concerns regarding interpretation. Diagnostic treatment trials offer a practical means to verify clinical impression. Treatment options are similar to those in vocal fold paralysis. Otolaryngologists should remain vigilant to identify paresis at the same time that they remain wary of casual overdiagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sulica L. Vocal fold paresis: an evolving clinical concept. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2013;1(3):158–62.

  2. Koufman JA, Postma GN, Cummins MM, Blalock PD. Vocal fold paresis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122(4):537–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heman-Ackah YD, Barr A. Mild vocal fold paresis: understanding clinical presentation and electromyographic findings. J Voice. 2006;20(2):269–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson CB, May LS, Green JK, Eller RL, Jackson CE. Vibratory asymmetry in mobile vocal folds: is it predictive of vocal fold paresis? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120(4):239–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Badia PI, Hillel AT, Shah MD, Johns MM 3rd, Klein AM. Computed tomography has low yield in the evaluation of idiopathic unilateral true vocal fold paresis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):204–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stager SV. Vocal fold paresis: etiology, clinical diagnosis and clinical management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;22(6):444–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woo P, Isseroff TF, Parasher A, Richards A, Sivak M. Laryngeal Electromyographic findings in patients with vocal fold motion asymmetry. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):E273–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson CB, Cheung EJ, Jackson CJ. Vocal fold paresis: clinical and electrophysiologic features in a tertiary laryngology practice. J Voice. 2009;23(3):396–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daggumati S, Panossian MDH, Sataloff MDDMAFACSR. Vocal fold paresis: incidence, and the relationship between voice handicap index and laryngeal EMG findings. J Voice. 2019;33(6):940–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu AP, Sulica L. Diagnosis of vocal fold paresis: current opinion and practice. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(4):904–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory ND, Chandran S, Lurie D, Sataloff RT. Voice disorders in the elderly. J Voice. 2012;26(2):254–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rafii B, Taliercio S, Achlatis S, Ruiz R, Amin MR, Branski RC. Incidence of underlying laryngeal pathology in patients initially diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(6):1420–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sulica L. Hoarseness misattributed to reflux: sources and patterns of error. Ann Otol Rhinol laryngol. 2014;123(6):442–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keesecker SE, Murry T, Sulica L. Patterns in the evaluation of hoarseness: time to presentation, laryngeal visualization, and diagnostic accuracy. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(3):667–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee B, Woo P. Chronic cough as a sign of laryngeal sensory neuropathy: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(4):253–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woo P, Mangaro M. Aberrant recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation as a cause of stridor and laryngospasm. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113(10):805–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin AD, Praneetvatakul V, Heman-Ackah Y, Moyer CA, Mandel S, Sataloff RT. Repetitive phonatory tasks for identifying vocal fold paresis. J Voice. 2005;19(4):679–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akbulut S, Inan RA, Altintas H, Gul I, Berk D, Paksoy M. Vocal fold paresis accompanying vocal fold polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(1):149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris G, O'Meara C, Pemberton C, Rough J, Darveniza P, Tisch S, et al. Vocal fold paresis - a debilitating and underdiagnosed condition. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(S2):S48–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Estes C, Sadoughi B, Mauer E, Christos P, Sulica L. Laryngoscopic and stroboscopic signs in the diagnosis of vocal fold paresis. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2100–5 This provides insight into how paresis is diagnosed by specialists and demonstrates the subjectivity of stroboscopic visualization.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Isseroff TF, Parasher AK, Richards A, Sivak M, Woo P. Interrater reliability in analysis of Laryngoscopic features for unilateral vocal fold paresis. J Voice. 2016;30(6):736–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carroll TL, Gartner-Schmidt J, Statham MM, Rosen CA. Vocal process granuloma and glottal insufficiency: an overlooked etiology? Laryngoscope. 2010;120(1):114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Halum SL, Miller P, Early K. Laryngeal granulomas associated with superior laryngeal nerve paresis. J Voice. 2010;24(4):490–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koufman JA, Belafsky PC. Unilateral or localized Reinke’s edema (pseudocyst) as a manifestation of vocal fold paresis: the paresis podule. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(4 Pt 1):576–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. • Ho GY, Leonhard M, Volk GF, Foerster G, Pototschnig C, Klinge K, et al. Inter-rater reliability of seven neurolaryngologists in laryngeal EMG signal interpretation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(10):2849–56 This highlights the subjectivity of LEMG signal interpretation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell WW. Essentials of Electrodiagnostic medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Volk GF, Themel S, Gugatschka M, Pototschnig C, Sittel C, Muller AH, et al. Vocal fold paresis: medical specialists' opinions on standard diagnostics and laryngeal findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(10):2535–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carroll TL, Rosen CA. Trial vocal fold injection. J Voice. 2010;24(4):494–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dumberger LD, Overton L, Buckmire RA, Shah RN. Trial vocal fold injection predicts thyroplasty outcomes in nonparalytic glottic incompetence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017;126(4):279–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Crawley BK, Murry T, Sulica L. Injection augmentation for chronic cough. J Voice. 2015;29(6):763–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Litts JK, Fink DS, Clary MS. The effect of vocal fold augmentation on cough symptoms in the presence of glottic insufficiency. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(6):1316–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murry T, Sapienza C. The role of voice therapy in the management of paradoxical vocal fold motion, chronic cough, and laryngospasm. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;43(1):73–83 viii-ix.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vertigan AE, Theodoros DG, Gibson PG, Winkworth AL. Review series: chronic cough: behaviour modification therapies for chronic cough. Chron Respir Dis. 2007;4(2):89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Halum SL, Sycamore DL, McRae BR. A new treatment option for laryngeal sensory neuropathy. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(9):1844–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Giliberto JP, Cohen SM, Misono S. Are neuromodulating medications effective for the treatment of chronic neurogenic cough? Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1007–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei W, Liu R, ZhangTong Y, Qiu Z. The efficacy of specific neuromodulators on human refractory chronic cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(10):2942–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Simpson CB, Tibbetts KM, Loochtan MJ, Dominguez LM. Treatment of chronic neurogenic cough with in-office superior laryngeal nerve block. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(8):1898–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dhillon VK. Superior laryngeal nerve block for neurogenic cough: a case series. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019;4(4):410–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kupfer RA, Merati AL, Sulica L. Medialization laryngoplasty for odynophonia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(6):556–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, 240 East 59th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA

    Keith Chadwick & Lucian Sulica

Authors
  1. Keith Chadwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucian Sulica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Chadwick.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on Neurolaryngology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chadwick, K., Sulica, L. Vocal Fold Paresis 2020. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 8, 236–242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-020-00289-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-020-00289-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation