Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Light intensity and photoperiod influence the growth and development of hydroponically grown leaf lettuce in a closed-type plant factory system

  • Research Report
  • Protected Horticulture
  • Published:
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effect of light provided by various light intensities combined with different photoperiods on the growth and morphogenesis of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) ‘Hongyeom Jeockchukmyeon’ in a closed-type plant factory system were evaluated in this study. Four light intensity treatments, i.e., 200, 230, 260, and 290 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD, provided from light-emitting diodes (LEDs), with a combination of three different photoperiods 18/6 (1 cycle), 9/3 (2 cycles) or 6/2 (3 cycles) (light/dark) were used. The combination of 290-9/3 (light intensity-photoperiod) showed the highest plant height and fresh shoot weight, while plants grown at 290-18/6 exhibited the greatest root fresh weight, leaf dry weight, and longest root length. The greatest leaf width, maximum number of leaves, and greatest root dry weight were observed in the treatment combination of 290-6/2. Anthocyanin content was found to be highest in the 290-6/2 and lowest in the 200-6/2 treatment, whereas chlorophyll fluorescence was observed to be highest in the 260-6/2 and the lowest in the 290-9/3 treatment. Our data showed that providing a high light intensity of 290 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD with a shorter photoperiod of 6/2 (light/dark) resulted in good plant growth and development of lettuce, whereas growth at light intensities of 230 or 260 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD with longer photoperiods of 18/6 and 9/3 (light/dark) resulted in good growth as well as higher photosynthetic capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ali, M.B., L. Khandaker, and S. Oba. 2009. Comparative study on functional components, antioxidant activity and color parameters of selected colored leafy vegetables as affected by photoperiods. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7:392–398.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amasino, R.M. 1996. Control of flowering time in plants. Current Opin. Genet. Dev. 6:480–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, F., R. Youssef, C. Mariateresa, R. Elvira, B. Alberto, and C. Giuseppe. 2009. Yield and quality of leafy lettuce in response to nutrient solution composition and growing season. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7:456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, T.A.O. and B. Bugbee. 2001. Differences in the response of wheat, soybean and lettuce to reduced blue radiation. Photochem. Photobiol. 73:199–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W., P. Li, Y. Wu, and J. Tang. 2012a. Effects of different light intensities on anti-oxidative enzyme activity, quality and biomass in lettuce. Sci. Hort. 39:129–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W., P. Li, and Y. Wu. 2012b. Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce. Sci. Hort. 135:45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuleki, T. and F.J. Francis. 1968. Quantitative methods for anthocyanins. J. Food Sci. 33:72–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanyu, H. and K. Shoji. 2000. Effects of blue light and red light on kidney bean plants grown under combined radiation from narrow-band light sources. Environ. Control Biol. 38:25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D.C. and D.J. Burritt. 2004. Light quality influences adventitious shoot production from cotyledon explants of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 40:215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, A., S. Nakayama, Y. Kitaya, and K. Yabuki. 1988a. Effects of photoperiod, CO2 concentration, and light intensity on growth and net photosynthesis rates of lettuce and turnip. Acta Hort. 229:273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, A., S. Nakayama, Y. Kitaya, and K. Yabuki. 1988b. Basic study on material production in plant factory — Effects of photoperiod, light intensity, and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of lettuce. Environ. Control Biol. 26:107–112. (in Japanese with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K. and Y. Yabumoto. 1989. Effects of light quality, daylength and periodic temperature variation on the growth of lettuce and radish plants. Japan. J. Crop Sci. 58:689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johkan, M., K. Shoji, F. Goto, S.N. Hashida, and T. Yoshihara. 2010. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience 45:1809–1814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. and G. Hrazdina. 1998. Interaction of nitrogen availability during bloom and light intensity during veraison. II. Effects on anthocyanin and phenolic development during grape ripening. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 49:341–349.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.H., G.D. Goins, R.M. Wheeler, and J.C. Sager. 2004. Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and blue-light-emitting diodes. HortScience 39:1617–1622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitaya, Y., G. Niu, T. Kozai, and M. Ohashi. 1998. Photosynthetic photon flux, photoperiod, and CO2 concentration affect growth and morphology of lettuce plug transplants. HortScience 33:988–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.M. 1992. Effects of green light on biological systems. Biol. Rev. 67:199–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S.L. and C.A. Mitchell. 1983a. Enhancement of lettuce yield by manipulation of light and nitrogen nutrition. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:750–754.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S.L. and C.A. Mitchell. 1983b. Stimulation of lettuce productivity by manipulation of diurnal temperature and light. HortScience 18:462–463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S.L. and C.A. Mitchell. 1988. Effects of CO2 and photosynthetic photon flux on yield, gas exchange and growth rate of Lactuca sativa ‘Waldmanns Green’. J. Expt. Bot. 39:317–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H.V. and R.P. Prince. 1986. Effect of 16 and 24 hours daily radiation (light) on lettuce growth. HortScience 21:123–124.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopsell, D.A. and D.E. Kopsell. 2008. Genetic and environmental factors affecting plant lutein/zeaxanthin. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech. 19:44–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozai, T., K. Ohyama, F. Afreen, S. Zoyabed, C. Kubota, T. Hoshi, and C. Chun. 1999. Transplant production in closed systems with artificial lighting for solving global issues on environment conservation, food, resource and energy. Proc. ACESYS III Conf. p. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefsrud, M.G., D.A. Kopsell, R.M. Auge, and A.J. Both. 2006. Biomass production and pigment accumulation in kale grown under increasing photoperiods. HortScience 41:603–606.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. and C. Kubota. 2009. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ. Exp. Bot. 67:59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z.Z. and S.F. Gong. 2002. Vertical column and system of columnar soilless culture (SCSC) and its application to cultivation of lettuce. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 8:142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, M.L., H.N. Murthy, and K.Y. Paek. 2002. Effects of light emitting diodes (LEDs) on the in vitro induction and growth of bulblets of Lillium oriental hybrid ‘Pesaro’. Sci. Hort. 94:365–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCree, K.J. 1972. The action spectra, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agr. Meterol. 9:191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M.S. 2003. Photobiology of higher plants. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C.A., T. Leakakos, and T.L. Ford. 1991. Modification of yield and chlorophyll content in leaf lettuce by HPS radiation and nitrogen treatments. HortScience 26:1371–1374.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mor, Y., A.H. Halevy, and D. Porath. 1980. Characterization of the light reaction promoting the mobilizing ability of rose shoot tips. Plant Physiol. 66:996–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nhut, D.T., T. Takamura, H. Watanabe, K. Okamoto, and M. Tanaka. 2003. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under super bright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 73:43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, G.C., C.D. Ehaliotis, and V.A. Kavvadias. 2007. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers applied during successive crop seasons on growth and nitrate accumulation in lettuce. Sci. Hort. 111:319–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Balibrea, S., D.A. Moreno, and C. Garcia-Viguera. 2008. Influence of light on health promoting phytochemicals of broccoli sprouts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 88:904–910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, K. 1975. Stomatal action. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 26: 309–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savvas, D. and H.C. Passam. 2002. Hydroponic production of vegetable and ornamentals. Embryo Publications, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarth, G.W. 1932. Mechanism of the action of light and other factors on stomatal movement. Plant Physiol. 7:481–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K.S., H.N. Murthy, J.W. Heo, E.J. Hahn, and K.Y. Paek. 2008. The effect of light quality on the growth and development of in vitro cultured Doritaenopsis plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 30:339–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. 1993. Sensing the light environment: The functions of the phytochrome family, p. 377–416. In: R.E. Kendrick and G.H.M. Kronenberh (eds.). Photomorphogenesis in plants. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld, C. and N. Straver. 1994. Nutrient solutions for vegetables and flower grow in water or substrates. 8th ed. Proefstation voor tuinbouw onder glas te Naaldiwjk. no. 8, Holland, p. 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbits, T.W., D.C. Morgan, and I.J. Warrington. 1983. Growth of lettuce, spinach, mustard, and wheat plants under four combinations of high-pressure sodium, metal halide, and tungsten halogen lamps at equal PPFD. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:622–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2007. Vegetables and melons outlook. VGS-321/21 June 2007. USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/vgs/tables/fresh.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Vooren, J., G.W.H. Welles, and G. Hayman. 1986. Glasshouse crop production, p. 581–623. In: J. Atherton and J. Rudich (eds.). The tomato crop. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahos, J.C., E. Heuvelink, and G.F.P. Martakis. 1991. A growth analysis study of three Achimenes cultivars grown under three light regimes. Sci. Hort. 46:275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R.M., C.L. Mackowiak, J.C. Sager, N.C. Yorio, W.L. Berry, and W.M. Knott. 1994. Growth and gas exchange by lettuce stands in a closed controlled environment. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 610–615.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio, N.C., G.D. Goins, H.R. Kagie, R.M. Wheeler, and J.C. Sager. 2001. Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience 36:380–383.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea

    Jeong Hwa Kang, Sarah Louise Sua Atulba, Byoung Ryong Jeong & Seung Jae Hwang

  2. Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea

    Sugumaran KrishnaKumar, Byoung Ryong Jeong & Seung Jae Hwang

  3. Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea

    Sugumaran KrishnaKumar, Byoung Ryong Jeong & Seung Jae Hwang

  4. Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea

    Byoung Ryong Jeong & Seung Jae Hwang

Authors
  1. Jeong Hwa Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sugumaran KrishnaKumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Louise Sua Atulba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Byoung Ryong Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seung Jae Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Jae Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, J.H., KrishnaKumar, S., Atulba, S.L.S. et al. Light intensity and photoperiod influence the growth and development of hydroponically grown leaf lettuce in a closed-type plant factory system. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 54, 501–509 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-013-0109-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-013-0109-8

Additional key words

Search

Navigation