Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of hemoglobin S variants on the measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c by four analytical methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) identifies the average plasma glucose concentration over 120 days. HbA1c test measurements can lead to false outcomes in patients with inherited hemoglobin variants as hemoglobin S, which is prevalent in the Middle Eastern population. Our aim was to evaluate four different methods for measuring the blood HbA1c levels in diabetic patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT). Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes from 38 diabetic patients with either SCA or SCT. HbA1c levels were measured on all samples at three different local hospitals using three different analyzers: the Cobas Integra700 (Roche, SZ), the Dimension RXL (Siemens, USA), and the DCA2000 (Siemens, USA). All methods were compared to the standard HPLC method Variant (Bio-Rad, USA). There was a good correlation (R 2) between HbA1c levels measured by the HPLC Variant II and immunoassay analyzers and between the immunoassay analyzers themselves in SCT, but not in SCA, patients. However, an excellent correlation was observed in the SCA group between the Dimension RXL and Cobas Integra analyzers (R 2 = 0.9918). Significant differences were observed in all the three immunoassay methods compared to the Variant HPLC (P <0.00001) and between the DCA2000+ and the Dimension RXL (P = 0.0144), as well as between the DCA2000+ and the Cobas Integra (P = 0.0247). We concluded that while HbA1c levels were undetected by some methods, other methods were able to measure HgbA1c with a high degree of accuracy. Therefore, we recommend that any affected HbA1c samples should be measured by two different methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Ma- lone JI, Nathan D, Peterson CM. Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23 Suppl 1:S80–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martina WV, Martijn EG, van der Molen M, Schermer JG, Muskiet FAJ. β-N-terminal glycohemoglobins in subjects with common hemoglobinopathies: relation with fructosamine and mean erythrocyte age. Clin Chem. 1993;39:2259–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frank EL, Moulton L, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, Rohlfing C, Roberts WL. Effects of hemoglobin C and S traits on seven glycohemoglobin methods. Clin Chem. 2000;46:864–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weykamp CW, Penders TJ, Muskiet FA, van der Slik W. Influence of hemoglobin variants and derivatives on glycohemoglobin determinations, as investigated by 102 laboratories using 16 methods. Clin Chem. 1993;39:1717–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smaldone A. Glycemic control and hemoglobinopathy: when A1c may not be reliable. Diabetes Spectr. 2008;21:46–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malekiani CL, Ganesan A, Decker CF. Effect of hemoglobinopathies on hemoglobin A1c measurements. Am J Med. 2008;121(6):e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiwanitkit V. Problem of using hemoglobin A1c measurement in endemic area of hemoglobinopathy. Prim Care Diabetes. 2007;1:173–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sacks DB. Hemoglobin variants and hemoglobin A1c analysis: problems solved? Clin Chem. 2003;49:1245–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A database of human hemoglobin variants and thalassemias. Available from: http://www.globin.cse.psu.edu/cgi-bin/hbvar/counter. Accessed 25/07/2011.

  10. Bry L, Chen PC, Sacks DB. Effects of hemoglobin variants and chemically modified derivatives on assays for glycohemoglobin. Clin Chem. 2001;47:153–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chu CH, Wang MC, Sun TH, Lee JK, Lam HC. Very low HbA1c values in a patient with clinical silent hemoglobin variant (Hemoglobin J): a case report. J Intern Med Taiwan. 2007;18:45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nigam PK, Sharma S, Sareen R, Paul V, Lal A. Lack of precision in HbA1c values on variant II in cases of hemoglobin Q India. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2006;21:72–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Ouweland JM, van Daal H, Klaassen CH, van Aarssen Y, Harteveld CL, Giordano PC. The silent hemoglobin alpha chain variant Hb Riccarton [alpha 51(CE9)Gly ->Ser] may affect HbA1c determination on the HLC-723 G7 analyzer. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:827–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kilpatrick ES, Bloomgarden ZT, Zimmet PZ. Is hemoglobin A1c a step forward for diagnosing diabetes? BMJ. 2009;339(10):1288–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnedl WJ, Liebminger A, Roller RE, Lipp RW, Krejs GJ. Hemoglobin variants and determination of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;17:94–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schnedl WJ, Krause R, Halwachs-Baumann G, Trinker M, Lipp RW, Krejs GJ. Evaluation of HbA1c determination methods in patients with hemoglobinopathies. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. John WG, Braconnier F, Miedema K, Aulesa C, Piras G. Evaluation of the Menarini-Arkay HA 8140 hemoglobin A1c analyzer. Clin Chem. 1997;43:968–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carta M, Dall’Olio G, Soffiati G. Determination of HbA1c in the presence of haemoglobin variants: comparison of three HPLC techniques. Eur J Clin Chem Biochem. 1997;35:923–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weykamp CW, Penders TJ, Siebelder CW, Muskiet FA, van der Slik W. Interference of carbamylated and acetylated hemoglobins in assays of glycohemoglobin by HPLC, electrophoresis, affinity chromatography, and enzyme immunoassay. Clin Chem. 1993;39:138–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang J, Hoke C, Ettinger B, Penerian G. Evaluation and interference study of hemoglobin A1c measured by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109:274–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts WL, Chiasera JM, Ward-Cook K. Glycohemoglobin results in samples with hemoglobin C or S trait: a comparison of four test systems [Technical Brief]. Clin Chem. 1999;45:906–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts WL, De BK, Brown D, Hanbury CM, Hoyer JD, John WG, et al. Effects of Hemoglobin C and S traits on eight glycohemoglobin methods. Clin Chem. 2002;48:383–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miedema K, Lenters-Westra E, Horowitz G, Pistorino A, Patel R, Ng K, et al. Evaluation of the technical feasibility of Tina-quant HbA1c Gen.2. Assay on COBAS INTEGRA 800 [Abstract]. Clin Chem. 2005;51:A234.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Beckwith B, Smith C, Horowitz G. Misleading glycated hemoglobin results in a patient with hemoglobin SC disease. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1394–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Watanabe T, Kato K, Yamada D, Midorikawa Sato W, Shiga M, Otsuka Y, et al. A nondiabetic case of hemoglobin variant (Hb Nigiata) with inappropriately high and low HbA1c titers detected by different methods. Clin Chem. 1998;44:1562–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts WL, Safar-Pour S, De BK, Rohlfing CL, Weykamp CW, Little RR. Effects of hemoglobin C and hemoglobin S traits on glycohemoglobin measurements by eleven methods. Clin Chem. 2005;51:776–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mongia SK, Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Hanson S, Roberts RF, Owen WE, et al. Effects of hemoglobin C and S traits on 14 commercial glycated hemoglobin assays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Higgins T, Stewart D, Boehr E. Challenges in HbA1c analysis and reporting: an interesting case illustrating many pitfalls. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:1104–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee KF, Szeto YT, Benzie IFF. Glycohaemoglobin measurement: methodological differences in relation to interference by urea. Acta Diabetol. 2002;39:35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schnedl WJ et al. Determination of glycated hemoglobin in clinically silent hemoglobin variants. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20:460–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakanishi T, Iguchi K, Shimizu H. A method for hemoglobin A1c measurement based on peptide analysis by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with deuterium-labeled synthetic peptides as internal standards. Clin Chem. 2003;49:829–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bisse E, Schauber C, Zorn N, Epting T, Eigel A, Van Dorsselaer A, et al. Hemoglobin Görwihl [α 2ß25(A2)Pro → Ala], an electrophoretically silent variant with impaired glycation. Clin Chem. 2003;49:137–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Friess U, Beck A, Kohne E, Lehmann R, Koch S, Haring H-U, et al. Novel hemoglobin variant [ß66(E10) Lys → Asn], with decreased oxygen affinity, causes falsely low hemoglobin A1c values by HPLC. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1412–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) and King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) for supporting this project. We would also like to thank the laboratory and nursing staff of King Fahad National Guard Hospital for supporting this project. Special thanks to Mr. Omar Alhazza, Mr. Abdullah Alshargroud, and Mr. Mohammed Alomran from the Information Service Department ISD for their help and support. Portion of this work was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) July 2010, Los Angeles, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    W. Tamimi, S. Aljasser, R. Kanan, N. Aldegaither, M. Alrwali, A. Elfatah & W. Alsaeed

  2. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Riyadh Military Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    R. Dafterdar

  3. Salman bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia

    F. Q. Alenzi

  4. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    R. Hasanato

Authors
  1. W. Tamimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Aljasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Kanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Dafterdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Aldegaither
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Alrwali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Elfatah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. W. Alsaeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. F. Q. Alenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. R. Hasanato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Tamimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamimi, W., Aljasser, S., Kanan, R. et al. Effects of hemoglobin S variants on the measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c by four analytical methods. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 35, 392–399 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-014-0257-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-014-0257-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation