Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A modified technique of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a preliminary experience

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pancreatoduodenectomy currently represents the treatment of choice for resectable pancreatic and periampullary malignant tumours, symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, duodenal cystic dystrophy, large adenomas, diverticula and benign periampullary tumours. Pancreato-jejunostomy failure remains the main complication following pancreatoduodenectomy, even leading to death. To improve the safety of this anastomosis, a modified technique of pancreato-jejunal anastomosis with posterior double-layer suture and Wirsung duct evagination is proposed. We report our experience in eight consecutive patients (4 females, 4 males; average age 66, range 57–74) undergoing Traverso-Longmire pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy using Wirsung duct evagination and posterior double-layer suture technique. There was no mortality; the post-operative recovery was uneventful with no pancreatic anastomotic leakage. The mean post-operative stay was 15 days (range 12–19). This proposed procedure could be considered an additional opportunity in the performance of a pancreato-enteric anastomosis, yielding good results and preserving from post-operative pancreatic ductal obstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, Howard TJ, Wiebke EA, Wiesenauer CA et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg 139:718–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393(4):459–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim JH, Kim WH (2009) Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 33(2):326–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allema JH, Reinders ME, van Gulik TM, Koelemay MJ, Van Leeuwen DJ, de Wit LT et al (1995) Prognostic factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region. Cancer 75:2069–2076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA, Nagorney DM, McIlrath DC, Ilstrup D (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Balcom JH IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, Mascetta G, Molinari E, Pederzoli P (2001) Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume center: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 18:453–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130:295–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD (1990) Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 211:447–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM (1994) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 168:295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, Goodman SN et al (1995) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 221:721–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeo CJ, Barry MK, Sauter PK, Sostre S, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA et al (1993) Erythromycin accelerates gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 218:229–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T (2001) History of pancreatico-jejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of more reliable anastomosis technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:230–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakorafas GH, Friess H, Balsiger BM, Büchler MW, Sarr MG (2011) Problems of reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 18:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geer RJ, Brennan MF (1993) Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 165(1):68–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bai MD, Rong LQ, Wang LC, Xu H, Fan RF, Wang P et al (2008) Experimental study on operative methods of pancreaticojejunostomy with reference to anastomotico patency and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function. World J Gastroenterol 14:441–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nordback I, Parviainen M, Piironen A, Raty S, Sand J (2007) Obstructed pancreaticojejunostomy partly explains exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic head resection. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(2):263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2007) Clinical and economic validation of the international study group of pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 245(3):443–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Z’Graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai XW, Ma K, Wang FX, Yang FQ, Wang BS, Zhao HY et al (2003) Prevention of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy with separate internal drainage of bile and pancreatic fluid. HBPD Int 2:131–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Mario Testini, Giuseppe Piccinni, Luigi Greco, Germana Lissidini, Angela Gurrado, Riccardo Memeo, Ilaria Fabiola Franco, Vincenzo Memeo have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Testini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Testini, M., Piccinni, G., Greco, L. et al. A modified technique of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a preliminary experience. Updates Surg 63, 287–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0120-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0120-5

Keywords

Navigation