Skip to main content
Log in

Improved biocompatibility of polyethylenimine (PEI) as a gene carrier by conjugating urocanic acid: In vitro and in vivo

  • Articles
  • Published:
Macromolecular Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyethylenimine (PEI) is a promising gene carrier among polymeric vectors because of its high transfection efficiency, buffering capacity, which is responsible for its escape from endosomes, facility of modification, reasonable price and wide range of molecular weight. However, toxicity of PEI is an important obstacle to overcome for using it as a gene carrier in gene therapy protocols. In our study, PEI (10 kDa) was modified with urocanic acid, which has an imidazole ring (PEIU). This modification of PEI played an important role by improving transfection efficiency and reducing toxicity. The PEIU was condensed with DNA in different nitrogen of polycation/phosphate of DNA (N/P) ratios starting from 1.25. The PEIU/DNA complexes formed smaller (60–80 versus 100–400 nm) and less dispersible particles than PEI/DNA complexes. Cell viability test showed that in all the transfection experiments PEIU was always found less toxic than the PEI on three different cell-lines, Cos-7, HeLa, and 293T. The PEIU demonstrated improved biocompatibility as compared to the PEI. The in vitro transfection experiments showed that the PEIU displayed similar or lower transfection efficiencies than the PEI in the absence of serum. In medium complemented with serum, the PEIU had higher transfection efficiencies than the PEI. In vivo transfection experiments were carried out with intravenous and subcutaneous injections into mice. Five different organs were taken and lysed for quantification of expressed GFP. The quantification of the fluorescence of these organs exhibited that the PEIU has better transfection efficiency in in vivo experiments compared to the PEI. This study generated a strong evidence indicating that PEIU can be considered as a promising versatile gene carrier because of its biocompatibility and good transfection efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Giacca and S. Zacchigna, J. Control. Release, 161, 377 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. K. Chen, C. H. Jones, P. Mistriotis, Y. Yu, X. Ma, A. Ravikrishnan, M. Jiang, S. T. Andreadis, B. A. Pfeifer, and C. Cheng, Biomaterials, 34, 9688 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Vannucci, M. Lai, F. Chiuppesi, L. Ceccherini-Nelli, and M. Pistello, New. Microbiol., 36, 1 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Kay, J. C. Glorioso, and L. Naldini, Nat. Med., 7, 33 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. C. Hunter, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 58, 1523 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. T. Godbey, K. K. Wu, and A. G. Mikos, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 45, 268 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. W. Pack, A. S. Hoffman, S. Pun, and P. S. Stayton, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 4, 581 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Demeneix, J. Behr, O. Boussif, M. A. Zanta, B. Abdallah, and J. Remy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 30, 85 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. T. Godbey, K. K. Wu, and A. G. Mikos, J. Control. Release, 60, 149 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Neu, D. Fischer, and T. Kissel, J. Gene Med., 7, 992 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. J. Sung, S. H. Min, K. Y. Cho, S. Lee, Y. J. Min, Y. I. Yeom, and J. K. Park, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 26, 492 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Wightman, R. Kircheis, V. Rossler, S. Carotta, R. Ruzicka, M. Kursa, and E. Wagner, J. Gene Med., 3, 362 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kircheis, L. Wightman, A. Schreiber, B. Robitza, V. Rossler, M. Kursa, and E. Wagner, Gene Ther., 8, 28 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Kircheis, L. Wightman, and E. Wagner, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 53, 341 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Choksakulnimitr, S. Masuda, H. Tokuda, Y. Takakura, and M. Hashida, J. Control. Release, 34, 233 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Overberger, T. Stpierre, N. Vorchhei, J. Lee, and S. Yaroslav, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 296 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. W. Pack, D. Putnam, and R. Langer, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 67, 217 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. E. Ihm, K. O. Han, I. K. Han, K. D. Ahn, D. K. Han, and C. S. Cho, Bioconjug. Chem., 14, 707 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. E. Ihm, K. O. Han, C. S. Hwang, J. H. Kang, K. D. Ahn, I. K. Han, D. K. Han, J. A. Hubbell, and C. S. Cho, Acta. Biomater., 1, 165 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Putnam, C. A. Gentry, D. W. Pack, and R. Langer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 1200 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Mishra, J. Heidel, P. Webster and M. Davis, J. Control. Release, 116, 179 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. I. K. Park, J. E. Ihm, Y. H. Park, Y. J. Choi, S. I. Kim, W. J. Kim, T. Akaike, and C. S. Cho, J. Control. Release, 86, 349 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Morcol, A. Subramanian, and W. H. Velander, J. Immunol. Methods, 203, 45 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Toth, L. Bogar, I. Juricskay, M. Keltai, S. Yusuf, L. J. Haywood, and H. J. Meiselman, Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc., 17, 117 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Asayama, T. Sekine, A. Hamaya, H. Kawakami, and S. Nagaoka, Polym. Adv. Technol., 16, 567 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Goegan, G. Johnson, and R. Vincent, Toxicol. In Vitro, 9, 257 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Lampela, J. Raisanen, P. T. Mannisto, S. Yla-Herttuala, and A. Raasmaja, J. Gene Med., 4, 205 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Ogris, P. Steinlein, M. Kursa, K. Mechtler, R. Kircheis, and E. Wagner, Gene Ther., 5, 1425 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Kunath, A. von Harpe,_D. Fischer, H. Peterson, U. Bickel, K. Voigt, and T. Kissel, J. Control. Release, 89, 113 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Zhang, P. Yadava, and J. Hughes, Methods, 33, 144 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. O. Boussif, F. Lezoualch, M. A. Zanta, M. D. Mergny, D. Scherman, B. Demeneix, and J. P. Behr, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 7297 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. G. J. Jeong, H. M. Byun, J. M. Kim, H. Yoon, H. G. Choi, W. K. Kim, S. J. Kim, and Y. K. Oh, J. Control. Release, 118, 118 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Kircheis, S. Schuller, S. Brunner, M. Ogris, K. H. Heider, W. Zauner, and E. Wagner, J. Gene Med., 1, 111 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Eun Ihm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ihm, J.E., Krier, I., Lim, J.M. et al. Improved biocompatibility of polyethylenimine (PEI) as a gene carrier by conjugating urocanic acid: In vitro and in vivo . Macromol. Res. 23, 387–395 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-015-3047-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-015-3047-8

Keywords

Navigation