Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of soil carbon transfer between forest soils in subtropical karst and clasolite areas and the karst carbon sink effect in Guilin, Guangxi, China

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elucidating soil carbon cycle in karst areas has been a major research focus, while the relationship between karst soil carbon transfer and karst carbon sinks is unclear. A comparative study of soil respiration rates, δ 13C values of CO2 from soil respiration, and CO2 concentrations in forest soil layers was conducted from September 2006 to August 2008 between karst and clasolite areas of the Maocun karst underground river catchment. The main results are as follows: (1) the soil respiration rate in limestone soil from the karst area is apparently lower than that in red soil from the clasolite area. The soil respiration rate in the karst area varied from 23.12 to 271.26 mgC/m2 h, with an average of 111.57 mgC/m2 h, while the soil respiration rate in the clasolite area varied from 51.60 to 326.28 mgC/m2 h, with an average of 148.99 mgC/m2 h. Taking the averages into account, the soil respiration rate in limestone soil was 25.12 % less than that in red soil; (2) the δ 13C values of soil respiration in the karst and clasolite areas were −29.35 to −18.26‰ and −29.21 to −22.60‰, respectively, with respective mean values of −22.68 and −26.21‰. The δ 13C value of soil respiration in the karst area was heavier than that in the clasolite area; (3) the CO2 concentration of limestone soil profiles had a bi-directional gradient, which was more obvious in seasons with good moisture and air temperature conditions. In contrast, the CO2 concentration of red soil profile had a uni-directional gradient, that is to say, the deeper the red soil layer, the higher the CO2 concentration. Taking into account the mean values of CO2 concentration, the CO2 concentration of limestone soil ranged between 0.05 and 0.60 %, with an annual average of 0.25 %. The CO2 concentration of red soil ranged between 0.05 and 1.09 %, with an annual average of 0.57 %, which indicated that the lower soil layer CO2 could be consumed and absorbed by carbonate rock dissolution at the soil/rock interface in the karst area. In other words, karst processes in soil represented one of the carbon sinks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benner R, Fogel ML, Sprague EK, Hodson RE (1987) Depletion of 13C in lignin and its implications for stable carbon isotope studies. Nature 329:708–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann N (2000) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1625–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerling TE, Solomon DK, Quade J, Bowman JR (1991) On the isotopic composition of carbon in soil carbon dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:3403–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar G, O’Leary M, Berry J (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration IN leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han G, Zhou G, Xu Z, Yang Y, Liu J, Shi K (2007) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling the spatial and temporal variation of soil respiration in an agricultural ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 39:418–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He SY, Xu SY, Zhang ML (1997) Observation on soil CO2 concentration, hydrochemistry, and their relationship with karst processes. Carsologica Sin 16:319–323 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • He SY, Pan GX, Cao JH, Tao YX, Teng YZ (2000) Research on characteristics of carbon cycle in epikarst ecological system. Quat Sci 20:383–390 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh JC, Yapp CJ (1999) Stable carbon isotope budget of CO2 in a wet, modern soil as inferred from Fe (CO3) OH in pedogenic goethite: possible role of calcite dissolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:767–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 363:815–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wei J, Cheng J, Li W (2014) Profile distribution of soil inorganic carbon along a chronosequence of grassland restoration on a 22-year scale in the Chinese Loess Plateau. CATENA 121:321–329. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu MG, Cao JH, He XY (2006) The comparative study of biogeochemistry between limestone soil and red soil in Maocun, Guilin. Guangxi Sci 13:58–64 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan G, Tao Y, Shun Y (1997) Some features of carbon cycles in karst system and the implication for epikarstification—an example of Yaji Karst experimental site in Guilin. China J Chin Geogr 7:48–57 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan GX, Cao JH, He SY, Teng YZ, Xu SY (2000) Sink effect of karst soil system on atmospheric CO2: evidence from field observation and simulation experiment in Yajie karst experimental site. Earth Sci Front 7:580–587 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan GX, Tao YX, Sun YH, He SY, Cao JH (2001) Variation of δ13C in karstification soil system in Yajicun, Guilin. Chin Sci Bull 46:1919–1923

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao YX, Pan GX, Sun YH, Teng YZ, Han FG (1998) The relationship between karst soil organic carbon geochemistry and karstification: taking Yajie karst experimental field in Guilin as an example. Volcanol Miner Resour 19:40–46 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu L-H, Hu T-X, Zhang J, Li X-W, Hu H-l, Liu L, Xiao Y-l (2013) Nitrogen addition stimulates different components of soil respiration in a subtropical bamboo ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 58:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the Natural Scientific Foundation for Young Scientists of China Grant No. 41402326; Natural Scientific Foundation for Young Scientists of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China under Grant No. 2013GXNSFBA019217; the China Geological Survey under Grant Nos. 1212010911062, S-2010-KP03- 07-02 and 12120113005300; the Ministry of Land and Resources under Grant No. 201211086-05 and Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS under Grant No. 2012005. The authors would like to thank the reviewers who read the first draft of this paper for their constructive comments that helped improve the manuscript. Thanks are also due to Yonghua Yang and YikYu Au for their help in improving the language of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhua Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Zhou, L., Huang, L. et al. A comparative study of soil carbon transfer between forest soils in subtropical karst and clasolite areas and the karst carbon sink effect in Guilin, Guangxi, China. Environ Earth Sci 74, 921–928 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3903-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3903-4

Keywords

Navigation