Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Trust

  • Target Article (with peer commentary)
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research intends to understand the influence of employee’s perception of psychological contract breach on their organizational citizenship behaviour and trust on employers. The study was carried out in private banks of North Delhi. Data were gathered from 90 junior level executives using convenience sampling method. Result revealed that psychological contract breach significantly predicts organizational citizenship behaviour and trust. The findings imply that the organization needs to understand and manage employee’s psychological contract properly otherwise perception of its breach can jeopardize employee’s citizenship behaviour and also their trust in employer which in turn may affect their job performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accenture’s High-Performance Business Research. (2011). Trust: Managing the Scarcest Commodity of All for High Performance. pp. 3

  • Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 19, 637–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atabay, G. (2007). Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring Cognitive Similarity and Leader-Member Exchange as Antecedents. Izmir: Izmir University Of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, M., & Guest, D. E. (2004). Fulfillment of the psychological contract and associated work attitudes: The role of fairness and trust. Paper presented at the BPS Division of Occupational Psychology Conference, Stratford, UK

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23, 927–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey’. The Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deery, S. J., Iverson, R. D., & Walsh, J. T. (2006). Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 166–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., Shippers, M. C., & Koopman, P. L. (2002). The Impact of leader behaviour on trust in management and co-workers. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, K. E., & Pappas, J. M. (2000). The role of trust in salesperson—sales manager relationships. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20, 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? In Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M., & Oddy, M. (2007). Violation of the Psychological Contract: The Mediating Effect of Relational Versus Transactional Beliefs. Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishak, N. A. (2005). Promoting Employees Innovativeness and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour through Superior-Subordinate Relationship in the Workplace. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13(2), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B., Jimmieson, N. L., & Lewis, M. J. (2000). Psychological contracts in Australia: A ‘fair go’ or ‘not-so-happy transition’? In D. M. Rousseau & R. Schalk (Eds.), Psychological Contracts: Cross-national Perspectives (pp. 29–45). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, J. A., & Kennedy, B. J. (2005). Psychological Contract Violation: Impacts on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment among Australian Senior Public Servants. Applied HRM Research, 10(2), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Brodt, S. E., & Whitner, M. E. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behaviour and organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 312–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J., Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: A comparison of traditional and expanded views. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 895–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III. (2005). Creating high performance organizations’. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: The new relationship and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, J. R., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, H., Lee, X., & Ge, H. (2008). Evading Tactics of Psychological Contract Violations. Asian Social Science, 4(11), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect and cognition based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MetLife Employee Benefits Trend Study. (2006). New York, Business Wire.

  • Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In M. R. Kramer & R. T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organisational citizenship behaviour: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: a review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leadership behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. Cited on: 28, 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Hui, C. (1993). Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 11, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Hornsey, M. J., Bordia, P., & Esposo, S. R. (2008). Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Insights from the Group Value Model. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1377–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van De Van, A. H. (1992). Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15, 245–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11(5), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suazo, M. M. (2009). The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work-related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(2), 136–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. F. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in management. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe-Morrison, E., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Hassan Jafri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jafri, M.H. Influence of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Trust. Psychol Stud 57, 29–36 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0112-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0112-z

Keywords

Navigation