Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics of Farmland Birds in Traditional Agroecosystems: The Value of Countryside Elements in Avian Conservation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the Zoological Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In India, urbanization and growth of cities have fragmented farmlands and the area under cultivation is dwindling. This study examined the ecological characteristics of rice fields, the inherent value of countryside elements and the relative occurrence of four species of farmland birds Dicrurus macrocercus, Turdoides affinis, Pavo cristatus, and Psittacula krameri along the Cauvery delta region, widely known as the granary of Tamil Nadu. The abundance and distribution of birds were analyzed at 30 sampling points for a year using the unlimited-radius point-counts. Among the four species recorded, D. macrocercus utilized more heterogeneous farmlands, while P. krameri was recorded in more intensively cultivated regions of the farmland. Pre-harvested rice fields predominantly supported species abundance and richness and exhibited a greater value for farmland birds than plowed, flooded or post-harvested fields. The abundance and richness of birds in agroecosystems increased with native vegetation cover and woody shelterbelts. D. macrocercus displayed greater tolerance towards monoculture plantations and elements within the mosaics like cable poles and power lines. Bird abundance in farmlands also correlated positively with decreasing distance from the mainland for D. macrocercus and T. affinis and showed a negative correlation for P. cristatus and P. krameri. D. macrocercus also displayed specialized resource utilization foraging techniques coinciding with cultivation activities resulting in bird-farmer mutualism. Cross-validation of the AIC models also showed that rice fields margined by greater amounts of vegetation cover and retention of species-specific modified elements supported the greatest abundance of farmland birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, G.W., R.A. Maller, and R. Litchfield. 1987. Comparison of bird populations in remnants of Wandoo woodland and in adjacent farmland. Australian Wildlife Research 14: 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, T.G., J.A. Vickery, and J.D. Wilson. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. 1991. Ecology of Curlews (Numenius arquata) and Lapwings (Vanellus vanellus) on farmland. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala.

  • Berg, A. 2002. Composition and diversity of bird communities in Swedish farmland-forest mosaic landscapes. Bird Study 49: 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International. 2015, 2018. The IUCN red list of threatened species.

  • Brambilla, M., et al. 2009. GIS-models work well but are not enough: habitat preferences of Lanius collurio at multiple levels and conservation implications. Biological Conservation 142: 2033–2042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information theoretic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CABI. 2019. Invasive species compendium. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/85888.

  • Chisholm, R.A., and S.W. Pacala. 2010. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 15821–15825.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Collard, S., and A. Le Brocque. 2009. Bird assemblages in fragmented agricultural landscapes: The role of small brigalow remnants and adjoining land uses. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 1649–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G.C., P.R. Ehrlich, and G.A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2001. Countryside biogeography: Use of human dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecological Applications 11: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekotter, T., R. Billeter, and T.O. Crist. 2008. Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Basic and Applied Ecology 9: 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, P.F., R.E. Green, and M.F. Heath. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Science 268: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dondina, O., V. Orioli, L. Colli, M. Luppi, and L. Bani. 2018. Ecological network design from occurrence data by simulating species perception of the landscape. Landscape Ecology 33: 75–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J.F., E. Bohnenblust, S. Goslee, D. Mortensen, and J. Tooker. 2014. Herbicide drift can affect plant and arthropod communities. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 185: 77–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estel, S., T. Kuemmerle, C. Alcantara, C. Levers, A. Prishchepov, and P. Hostert. 2015. Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sensing of Environment 163: 312–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., J. Girard, D. Duro, J. Pasher, A. Smith, S. Javorek, and L. Tischendorf. 2015. Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 200: 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C., A. Flohre, L.W. Clement, P. Batary, W.W. Weisser, T. Tscharntke, and C. Thies. 2011. Mixed effects of landscape structure and farming practice on bird diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 141: 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., T. Hartel, and T. Kuemmerle. 2012. Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters 5: 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., D.B. Lindenmayer, and A. Cowling. 2004. The challenge of managing multiple species at multiple scales: Reptiles in an Australian grazing landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H.A., G.W. Barrett, D.A. Saunders, and H.F. Recher. 2001. Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biological Conservation 97: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. 2009. Mapping species distributions: Spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.J., R.D. Gregory, D.W. Gibbons, J.H. Marchant, J.D. Wilson, S.R. Baillie, and N. Carter. 1995. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology 9: 1425–1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. 2016. India's alarming loss of agricultural lands has global impact. https://www.digitaljournal.com/news/environment/india.

  • Gregory, R.D., A. van Strien, P. Vorisek, A.W.G. Meyling, D.G. Noble, R.P.B. Foppen, and D.W. Gibbons. 2005. Developing indicators for European birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, E.H., J.R. Sauer, and A.J. Royle. 2010. Traffic effects on bird counts on North American breeding bird survey routes. The Auk 127: 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, R., and T. Inskipp. 2005. Birds of Southern India. New Delhi: Helm Field Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C.A., A. Medina, D.M. Sanchez, S. Vilchez, B. Hernandez, J.C. Saenz, J.M. Maes, F. Casanoves, and F.L. Sinclair. 2006. Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Applications 16: 1986–1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslem, A., and A.F. Bennett. 2008. Countryside elements and the conservation of birds in agricultural environments. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 125: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzon, I., and R.B. O’Hara. 2007. Effects of landscape complexity on farmland birds in the Baltic States. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 118: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, L. 1983. Unbiased estimation in line-futercept sampling. Biometrics 39: 965–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D.A., K.E. Lindsay, and R.W. Brook. 2011. Risk of agricultural practices and habitat change to farmland birds. Avian Conservation and Ecology 6 (1): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S.S. 2011. Land Accounting in India: Issues and concerns. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeales/egm/LandAcctIndia.pdf.

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., J.T. Wood, R.B. Cunningham, M. Crane, C. MacGregor, D. Michael, and R. Montague-Drake. 2009. Experimental evidence of the effects of a changed matrix on conserving biodiversity within patches of native forest in an industrial plantation landscape. Landscape Ecology 24: 1091–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyn, R.H., E.G. McNabb, P. Macak, and P. Noble. 2007. Eucalypt plantations as habitat for birds on previously cleared farmland in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 137: 533–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally, R., A.F. Bennett, and G. Horrocks. 2000. Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box-ironbark forests of central Victoria Australia. Biological Conservation 95: 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D., J.R. Crabtree, G. Weisinger, Y. Dax, N. Stamou, P. Fleury, J. Guttierez Lazpita, and A. Gibon. 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59: 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailafiya, D.M. 2015. Agrobiodiversity for biological pest control in Sub-Saharan. In Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol. 18, ed. E. Lichtfouse, 107–143. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A.D., J. Fischer, and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2006. Scattered trees are keystone structures: Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 132: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A.D., D.B. Lindenmayer, and S.C. Barry. 2004. The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural ‘‘matrix’’: A case study of the vulnerable superb parrot of south-eastern Australia. Biological onservation 120: 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T.G., S. McIntyre, C.P. Catterall, et al. 2006. Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biological Conservation 127: 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menchetti, M., M. Mori, and M.F. Angelici. 2016. Effects of the recent world invasion by ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri. In Problematic wildlife a cross-disciplinary approach, ed. F.M. Angelici, 253–266. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli, F., M. Beim, L. Jerzak, D. Jones, and P. Tryjanowski. 2014. Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? A review. Transportation Research Part D 30: 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mythili G., and J. Goedecke 2016. Economics of land degradation in India. In Economics of land degradation and improvement – A global assessment for sustainable development, ed. E. Nkonya et al. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nur, N., S.L. Jones, G.R. Geupel, and G. Geupel. 1999. Statistical guide to data analysis of avian monitoring programs. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA: US Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H.L., H.E. Pringle, H.H. Marshall, I.P.F. Owens, and A.M. Lord. 2014. Experimental evidence of impacts of an invasive parakeet on foraging behavior of native birds. Behavorial Ecology 25 (3): 582–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger, T., C. Hui, M. Gaertner, and L. Huntsinger. 2014. The impact of land abandonment on species richness and abundance in the Mediterranean basin: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9 (5): e98355.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prather, P.R., and T.A. Messmer. 2010. Raptor and corvid response to power distribution line perch deterrents in Utah. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 796–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.L., E.F. Cole, J. Bates, R.W. Payne, and W. Cresswell. 2012. Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 1919–1926.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C.J., G.R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. Martin, D.F. Desante, and B. Mila. 1996. Manual de Métodos de Campo para el Monitoreo de Aves Terrestres, 46. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USA: Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, P.J. 2011. Preserving frugivorous birds in agroecosystems: Lessons from Spanish olive orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 228–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheindt, F.E. 2003. The impacts of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? Journal of Ornithology 144: 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riojas Lopez, M.E., and E. Mellink. 2005. Potential for biological conservation on man modified semiarid habitats in northeastern Jalisco Mexico. Biodiversity Conservation 14 (9): 2251–2263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, N., and N. Maruyama. 1996. Foraging site preference of intermediate egrets Egretta intermedia during the breeding season in the eastern part of the Kanto Plain Japan. Journal of the Yamashina Institute Ornithology 28: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, O., J.P. Maelfait, W. van Wingerden, F. Hendrickx, R. Billeter, M. Speelmans, et al. 2005. Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 1129–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn, H., and E. Ripmeester. 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17: 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J.D., R.M. Kaminski, and K.J. Reinecke. 2010. Avian foods, foraging, and habitat conservation in world rice fields. Waterbirds 33: 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Seoane, S., P.E. Osborne, and J. Baudry. 2002. Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirements to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain. Biological Conservation 105: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, G., and S.A. Kittur. 2012. Methodological, temporal and spatial factors affecting modeled occupancy of resident birds in the perennially cultivated landscape of Uttar Pradesh, India. Landscape Ecology 27: 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J. 2004. A blue print for the countryside. Ibis 146: 230–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, J., D. Kleijn, W. Loonen, F. Berendse, and C. Smit. 2011. Seasonal distribution of meadow birds in relation to in-field heterogeneity and management. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 142: 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Data. 2016. https://data.worldbank.org/.

  • Wretenberg, J., T. Part, and A. Berg. 2010. Changes in local species richness of farmland birds in relation to land-use changes and landscape structure. Biological Conservation 143: 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuczynski, A. 2016. Farmland bird diversity in contrasting agricultural landscapes of southwestern Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning 148: 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the University Grants Commission, Government of India, for the financial assistance and support for the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Management, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, 620024, India

    Manjula Menon & Mohanraj Rangaswamy

Authors
  1. Manjula Menon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohanraj Rangaswamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjula Menon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menon, M., Rangaswamy, M. Dynamics of Farmland Birds in Traditional Agroecosystems: The Value of Countryside Elements in Avian Conservation. Proc Zool Soc 73, 352–361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-020-00333-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-020-00333-7

Keyword

Search

Navigation