Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated extraction of watershed boundary and drainage network from SRTM and comparison with Survey of India toposheet

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent development of digital representation has stimulated the development of automatic extraction of topographic and hydrologic information from digital elevation model input, using geographic information system (GIS) and hydrologic models that integrate multiple databases within a minimal time. The objective of this investigation is to compare the drainage extracted from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data with the drainage digitized from topographic data (1:50,000) and also to draw attention to the functions of an add-on tool in ArcGIS 9.2 (Arc Hydro v.2) of Kuttiyadi River basin. The analysis reveals that the watershed extracted from the SRTM digital elevation model (DEM) (90 m resolution) is having an area of 668 km2 and that from toposheet is 676 km2. The river mouth in the drainage network from the SRTM DEM is found to be shifted to the northern side from where it actually exists. The drainage network from SRTM DEM at stream threshold 15 (0.0002 % of maximum flow accumulation) is delivering best results than the other threshold value in comparison with the drainage pattern derived from toposheets. The study reveals the importance, reliability, and quaintness of drainage network and watershed derived from the SRTM using the Arc Hydro Tool, an extension for Environmental Systems Research Institute ArcGIS. The advantage of the Arc Hydro Tool is that it would help a novice with little GIS knowledge to run the model to obtain watershed and drainage network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram F, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Amir MSII (2012) Automatic delineation of drainage networks and catchments using DEM data and GIS capabilities: a case study. 18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference Launceston, Australia, 4 p

  • ArcHydro Tools (2011) http://downloads.esri.com/blogs/hydro/AH2/ArcHydroTools_2_0.zip. Accessed 16 July 2012

  • Babu P, Gigo P, Ashitha MK, Girish G (2012) Evaluation of ASTER and SRTM digital elevation models for drainage network delineation. National Seminar on Watershed Planning and Natural Resources management, Thiruvananthapuram. Organized by Kerala State Land Use Board (KSLUB), pp 159–163

  • Chorley RJ, Stanley A, Schumm S, David E (1984) Geomorphology. Methuen, London, pp 316–319

    Google Scholar 

  • David RM (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources, ESRI Press, Redlands, California

  • David WC, Eric JF, Tsan-Huei (Frank) Cheng, JM Pohl (2003) A computational-grid based extraction using SRTM digital elevation models, system for continental drainage network, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, 10 p

  • Fairfield J, Leymarie P (1991) Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 25(5):709–717. doi:10.1029/90WR02658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorokhovich Y, Voustianiouk A (2006) Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics. Remote Sens Environ 104:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James EJ (1995) Water Atlas of Kerala. Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode

  • Jenson SK (1991) Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrol Processes 5(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson SK, Domingue JO (1988) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54(11):1593–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Julia KP, Osorio J, Wolfe ML, Heatwole C, Benham B, Cardenas A (2007) Comparison of watershed boundaries derived from SRTM and ASTER digital elevation datasets and from a digitized topographic map. ASABE Annual International Meeting Sponsored by ASABE, Paper No. 072093, 10 p

  • Kale VS, Gupta A (2001) Introduction to geomorphology. Orient Longman Limited, Delhi, pp 82–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer C, Sudhanshu SP (2009) Automating Arc Hydro for watershed delineation. Proceedings of the 2009 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held at the University of Georgia, 6 p

  • Lee LH, Huang MJ, Yue SWSH, Lin CY (2008) An adaptive filtering and terrain recovery approach for airborne lidar data. Int J of Innovative Computing Information and Control 4(6):1783–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Su B, Yuan J, Li H, Zhang Q (2011) GIS techniques for watershed delineation of SWAT model in plain polders. Procedia Environ Sci Part C 10:2050–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh WM (1991) Landscape planning: environmental applications. Wiley, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz M, Mitasova H, Harmon RS (2011) Efficient extraction of drainage networks from massive, radar-based elevation models with least cost path search. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:667–678. doi:10.5194/hess-15-667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan JF, Mark DM (1984) The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 28:328–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyank PP, Ashis S (2010) Terrain characterization using SRTM data. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing 38(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Rizvi MS (2009) Tectonic process analysis in Zagros Mountain with the aid of drainage networks and topography maps dated 1950–2001 in GIS. Arab J Geosci 4(1):171–180. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0100-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (2000) http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed 10 June 2011

  • Strahler AN (1957) Dynamic basics of geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 6:923–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Subyami AM (2009) Hydrologic behavior and flood probability for selected arid basins in Makkah area, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0098-1, 8p

    Google Scholar 

  • Subyani A, Qar M, Matsah M (2010) Digital elevation model and multivariate statistical analysis of morphometric parameters of some wadis, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 5(1):147–157. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0149-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 33(2):309–319. doi:10.1029/96WR03137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Tieli S, Kun H, Fanhua Y, Zhiming L (2011) An adaptive approach for extraction of drainage network from shuttle radar topography mission and satellite imagery data. Int J of Innovative Computing Information and Control 7(12):6965–6978, ICIC International @ ISSN 1349–4198

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto K (2009) How to use ArcHydro. http://www.kristinayamamoto.com/archydro.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere thanks to the Executive Director of the Centre for Water Resources Development and Management (CWRDM) and also gratefully acknowledge fundings received from CWRDM under plan project (N-43). We are thankful to the developers of the Arc Hydro Tool, as their functions in the tool were supportive in developing attributes for hydrological studies and also grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girish Gopinath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gopinath, G., Swetha, T.V. & Ashitha, M.K. Automated extraction of watershed boundary and drainage network from SRTM and comparison with Survey of India toposheet. Arab J Geosci 7, 2625–2632 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0919-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0919-0

Keywords

Navigation