Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Sweet Sorghum for Biomass Production

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] has been suggested as a biofuel feedstock due to its high productivity, low N requirements, and drought tolerance but little data exist on its management in the Midwestern US Corn Belt. In 2005 and 2006 in central Iowa, USA, plots were seeded with ‘Top 76-6’ sweet sorghum on three dates; late May, early June, and late June, at rates of 4.5, 11.2, and 17.9 kg ha−1 with row widths of 20, 38, and 76 cm, and fertilized at either 84 or 168 kg N ha−1 to determine how sweet sorghum yield and plant composition respond to changes in management. Yields were highest when sweet sorghum was planted in 20 cm row widths in late May (26.3 Mg ha−1) or early June (29.0 Mg ha−1). Several plant carbohydrates were affected by seeding date in 2005, but not 2006. Theoretical ethanol yields averaged 10,616 and 11,408 L ha−1 in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and were highest when sweet sorghum was planted earlier in the season and in narrow rows. In contrast, N fertilization and seeding rate had few impacts on sweet sorghum growth, biomass yield or ethanol potential. Based on these results, sweet sorghum in Iowa should be planted in May or June in 20 cm rows at a low to moderate seeding rate and a low N fertilization rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almodares, A., and S.M. Darany. 2006. Effects of planting date and time of nitrogen application on yield and sugar content of sweet sorghum. Journal of Environmental Biology 27: 601–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, D.M. 1972. Effect of planting date and maturity on juice quality of Rio sweet sorghum. Agronomy Journal 64: 389–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, D.M., and K.C. Freeman. 1980. Stalk and sugar yield of sweet sorghum as affected by spacing. Agronomy Journal 72: 523–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., and C. Somerville. 2009. Cellulosic biofuels. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 165–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. 1984. Long-term fertility experiments on cotton, corn, soybeans, sorghum, and peanuts, 1929–1982. Bulletin 561. Auburn: Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Day, J.L., R.R. Duncan, P.L. Raymer, D.S. Thompson, and N. Zummo. 1995. Registration of ‘Top 76-6’ sweet sorghum. Crop Science 35: 1211–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraris, R., and D. Charles-Edwards. 1986. A comparative analysis of the growth of sweet and forage sorghum crops II: Accumulation of soluble carbohydrates and nitrogen. Crop and Pasture Science 37: 513–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, S. 1989. Potential yields and on-farm ethanol production cost of corn, sweet sorghum, fodder beet, and sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 162: 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnansounou, E., A. Dauriat, and C. Wyman. 2005. Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: Economic trade-offs in the context of North China. Bioresource Technology 96: 985–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godsey, C.B., J. Linneman, D. Bellmer, and R. Huhnke. 2012. Developing row spacing and planting density recommendations for rainfed sweet sorghum production in the Southern Plains. Agronomy Journal 104: 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B.M., K.J. Moore, S.L. Fales, and E.A. Heaton. 2010. Double-cropping sorghum for biomass. Agronomy Journal 102: 1586–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiragossian, V.Y., S.W. Van Socyoc, and J.D. Axtell. 1977. Chemical and biological methods for grain and forage sorghum. West Lafayette: Dept. of Agronomy, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, A., I.C. Anderson, and D.R. Buxton. 2001. Comparative economic analysis of perennial, annual, and intercrops for biomass production. Biomass and Bioenergy 21: 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, K., W. Pitman, M. Alison, D. Harrell, H. Viator, M. McCormick, K. Gravois, M. Kim, and D. Day. 2012. Agronomic considerations for sweet sorghum biofuel production in the south-central USA. Bioenergy Research 5: 748–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, E., F. Dohleman, and S. Long. 2008. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: The potential of Miscanthus. Global Change Biology 14: 2000–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holou, R.A.Y., and G. Stevens. 2012. Juice, sugar, and bagasse response of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv. M81E) to N fertilization and soil type. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 4: 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskinson, R.L., D.L. Karlen, S.J. Birrell, C.W. Radtke, and W. Wilhelm. 2007. Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 126–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, H.R., and J.M. Scholl. 1968. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on forage production and chemical composition of two sorghum cultivars harvested at two cutting frequencies. Agronomy Journal 60: 456–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresovich, S., and W.T. Lawhon. 1981. Agronomic research and development needs in sugar crops. In Proceedings of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, USA, June, eds. F.A. Martin and J.A. Polack, 69–71.

  • Martin, P., and F. Kelleher. 1984. Effects of row spacing and plant population on sweet sorghum yield. Animal Production Science 24: 386–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P.T., K.J. Moore, T.L. Richard, and C. Bern. 2007. Enzyme enhanced solid-state fermentation of kenaf core fiber for storage and pretreatment. Bioresource Technology 98: 3106–3111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlack, R.D., and B.J. Stokes. 2011. US billion-ton update: Biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D., W. Lueschen, B. Kanne, and T. Hoverstad. 1991. A comparison of sweet sorghum cultivars and maize for ethanol production. Journal of Production Agriculture 4: 337–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, W.L., J. Blumenthal, B. Bean, and J.E. Mullet. 2007. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 147–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 2011. SAS/STAT ® 9.3 user’s guide. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.A., and D.R. Buxton. 1993. Temperate zone sweet sorghum ethanol production potential. Bioresource Technology 43: 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J.L., R.L. Raper, and E.B. Schwab. 2012. The effect of row spacing and seeding rate on biomass production and plant stand characteristics of non-irrigated photoperiod-sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Industrial Crops and Products 37: 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamang, P.L., K.F. Bronson, A. Malapati, R. Schwartz, and J. Johnson. 2011. Nitrogen requirements for ethanol production from sweet and photoperiod sensitive sorghums in the Southern High Plains. Agronomy Journal 103: 431–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turgut, I. 2005. Production of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) increases with increased plant densities and nitrogen fertilizer levels. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B: Soil and Plant Science 55: 236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turhollow, A. 1994. The economics of energy crop production. Biomass and Bioenergy 6: 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act. Title II, energy security through increased production of biofuels, subtitle A, renewable fuel standard. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NASS. 2013. National statistics for corn. USDA. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/B27F93A5-9648-3ECF-A23E-A870AFA3AF60?pivot=short_desc. Accessed 8 May 2014.

  • US-EPA. 2013. 2012 RFS2 data. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/rfsdata/2012emts.htm. Accessed 6 May 2014.

  • Vogel, K.P., J.F. Pedersen, S.D. Masterson, and J.J. Toy. 1999. Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Science 39: 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenfeld, R. 1984. Nutrient requirements and use efficiency by sweet sorghum. Energy and Agriculture 3: 49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winberry, J.J. 1980. The sorghum syrup industry: 1854–1975. Agricultural History 54: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worker, G.F. 1973. Sudangrass and sudangrass hybrids responses to row spacing and plant maturity on yields and chemical composition. Agronomy Journal 65: 975–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann, C.S., A. Liska, R.B. Ferguson, D.J. Lyon, R. Klein, and I. Dweikat. 2010. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 102: 319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zegada-Lizarazu, W., and A. Monti. 2012. Are we ready to cultivate sweet sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock? A review on field management practices. Biomass and Bioenergy 40: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant No. 2011-68005-30411 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and by the Iowa State University Department of Agronomy.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Todd J. Cogdill

    Present address: BASF Corporation, Ankeny, IA, 50023, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 1234 Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Catherine L. Bonin

  2. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 1403 Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Emily A. Heaton

  3. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Todd J. Cogdill

  4. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 1571 Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Kenneth J. Moore

Authors
  1. Catherine L. Bonin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily A. Heaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Todd J. Cogdill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kenneth J. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine L. Bonin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonin, C.L., Heaton, E.A., Cogdill, T.J. et al. Management of Sweet Sorghum for Biomass Production. Sugar Tech 18, 150–159 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0377-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0377-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation