Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple, two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures: a comparison of post-operative outcomes, complications, reoperations and economics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Simple displaced transverse olecranon fractures are traditionally managed operatively with a tension band wire device (TBW). We compared clinical outcomes, morbidity and the cost of treatment of TBW versus pre-countered low-profile locking plates for the treatment of Mayo 2A fractures.

Patient and methods

All olecranon fractures admitted to our unit between 2008 and 2014 were identified (n = 129). Patient notes and radiographs were studied from presentation to final follow-up. Patient outcomes were recorded using the QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. Patient demographics and nature of complications were recorded as were the rate and nature of any repeat operation.

Results

Eighty-nine patients had Mayo 2A fractures (69%). Sixty-four underwent TBW (n = 48) or locking plate fixation (n = 16). The mean ages of both groups were similar at 57 (15–93) and 60 (22–80), respectively. In the TBW group, the mean post-injury QuickDASH was 12.9, compared with 15.0 for the locking plate group. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes for either group. Nineteen of the 48 TBW patients had complications (39.6%). Sixteen of the 48 TBW patients had reoperations (33.3%). In particular, we would highlight that 13 (27.1%) of patients treated with TBW underwent subsequent removal of metalwork for hardware irritation. There were no complications and or reoperations in the 16 patients who received locking plate fixation. Both complication and reoperation rates were statistically significantly different. Despite being initially more expensive, when the cost of reoperation for TBW group was included, locking plates were found to be on average £236.33 less per patient than for TBW.

Conclusions

We suggest that locking plates are superior to TBW concerning post-operative morbidity, reoperation rate and cost for Mayo 2A fractures in contrast to previous articles.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rommens PM, Kuchle R, Schneider RU, Reuter M (2004) Olecranon fractures in adults: factors influencing outcome. Injury 35:1149–1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrey BF (1995) Current concepts in the treatment of fractures of the radial head, the olecranon and the coronoid. J Bone Jt Surg 77A:316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber BG, Vasey H (1963) Osteosynthesis in olecranon fractures. Z Unfallmed Berufskr 56:90–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schliemann B, Raschke MJ, Groene P, Weimann A, Wähnert D, Lenschow S, Kösters C (2014) Comparison of tension band wiring and precontoured locking compression plate fixation in Mayo type IIA olecranon fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 80(1):106–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Adani R et al (2014) Simple and comminuted displaced olecranon fractures: a clinical comparison between tension band wiring and plate fixation techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1107–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DelSole EM, Pean CA, Tejwani NC, Egol KA (2016) Outcome after olecranon fracture repair: Does construct type matter? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalidis BE, Sachinis NC, Samoladas EP et al (2008) Is tension band wiring technique the ‘‘gold standard’’ for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study. J Orthop Surg Res 3:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Claessen FM, Braun Y, Peters RM, Dyer G, Doornberg JN, Ring D (2016) Factors associated with reoperation after fixation of displaced olecranon fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Candal-Couto JJ, Williams JR, Sanderson PL (2005) Impaired forearm rotation after tension-band-wiring fixation of olecranon fractures: evaluation of the transcortical K-wire technique. J Orthop Trauma 19(7):480–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalano LW 3rd, Crivello K, Lafer MP, Chia B, Barron OA, Glickel SZ (2011) Potential dangers of tension band wiring of olecranon fractures: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am 36(10):1659–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baecher N, Edwards S (2013) Olecranon fractures. J Hand Surg Am 38(3):593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricci WM (2015) Use of locking plates in orthopaedic trauma surgery. JBJS Rev 3(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C (2011) Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH). The DASH and QuickDASH outcome measure user’s manual, 3rd edn. Institute for Work & Health, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson J, Bajwa A, Kamath V et al (2011) Biomechanical comparison of interfragmentary compression in transverse fractures of the olecranon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):245–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchinson DT, Horwitz DS, Ha G et al (2003) Cyclic loading of olecranon fracture fixation constructs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(5):831–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Corsebar Rd, Paisley, PA2 9PN, UK

    A. J. Powell & I. W. W. McGraw

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

    O. M. Farhan-Alanie

Authors
  1. A. J. Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. M. Farhan-Alanie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. W. W. McGraw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Powell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powell, A.J., Farhan-Alanie, O.M. & McGraw, I.W.W. Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple, two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures: a comparison of post-operative outcomes, complications, reoperations and economics. Musculoskelet Surg 103, 155–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0556-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0556-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation