Abstract
Various methods have been adopted for monitoring marine megafauna and cetaceans in particular. Most of them rely on direct observation and have strong limitations: they are expensive and time-consuming; they allow monitoring only at small spatial and temporal scales; they require specialised technical staff. Satellite imagery to detect and count marine mammals from the space has become feasible. In the last years, the spectral, spatial and temporal accuracy of very high resolution satellites have improved, allowing to conduct censuses and to produce valid population estimates for some species. With the appearance of Web 2.0, ubiquitous computing and the related technological advancements, the different networks enable the general public to contribute, disseminate and exchange information. The use of data collected by citizen science projects is now ubiquitous, but still presents some challenges that need to be addressed. A major issue is that data collected by the public must be validated. We present a model for real-time monitoring of cetaceans by combining the citizen science and satellite image processing with the main link defined as location–time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen SM, Teilmann J, Dietz R, Schmidt NM, Miller LA (2012) Behavioural responses of harbour seals to human-induced disturbances. Aquat Conserv 22:113–121
Begall S, Cerveny J, Neef J, Vojtech O, Burda H (2008) Magnetic alignment in grazing and resting cattle and deer. Proc Natl Acad Sci 36:13451–13455
Cafaro V, Angeletti D, Bellisario B, Macali A, Carere C, Alessi J (2015) Habitat overlap between bottlenose dolphins and seabirds: a pilot study to identify high-presence coastal areas in the Tyrrhenian sea. J Mar Biol Ass 96:891–901
Campana I, Crosti R, Angeletti D, Carosso L, David L, Di-Meglio N, Moulins A, Rosso M, Tepsich P, Arcangeli A (2015) Cetacean response to summer maritime traffic in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar Env Res 109:1–8
Canestrelli D, Bisconti R, Carere C (2016) Bolder takes all? The behavioral dimension of biogeography. Trends Ecol Evol 31:35–43
Conrad CC, Hilchey KG (2011) A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ Mon Assess 176:273–291
Elder J, Goldberg R (1998) Interactive contour editing. In: Proceedings IEEE conference computer vision pattern recognition, pp 374–381
Fretwell PT, LaRue MA, Morin P, Kooyman GL, Wienecke B, Ratcliffe N, Fox AJ, Fleming AH, Porter C, Trathan PN (2012) An emperor penguin population estimate: the first global, synoptic survey of a species from space. PLoS ONE. 7:e33751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033751
Fretwell PT, Staniland IJ, Forcada J (2014) Whales from space: counting southern right whales by satellite. PLoS ONE 9:e88655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088655
Jønsson KA, Tøttrup AP, Borregaard MK, Keith SA, Rahbek C, Thorup K (2016) Tracking animal dispersal: from individual movement to community assembly and global range dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 31:204–214
LaRue MA, Rotella JJ, Garrott RA, Siniff DB, Ainley DG, Stauffer GE, Porter CC, Morin PJ (2011) Satellite imagery can be used to detect variation in abundance of Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii) in Erebus Bay, Antarctica. Polar Biol 34:1727–1737
Lippmann RP (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. Assp Mag IEEE 4:4–22
Marques TA, Martin Thomas SW, Mellinger DK, Ward JA, Moretti DJ, Harris D, Tyack PL (2013) Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics. Biol Rev 88:287–339
Marr D, Hildreth E (1980) Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc Lond B 207:187–217
Patenaude NJ, Richardson WJ, Smultea MA, Koski WR, Miller GW, Würsig B, Greene CR Jr (2002) Aircraft sound and disturbance to bowhead and beluga whales during spring migration in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Marine Mamm Sci 18:309–335
Pirotta E, Merchant ND, Thompson PM, Barton TR, Lusseau D (2015) Quantifying the effect of boat disturbance on bottlenose dolphin foraging activity. Biol Cons 181:82–89
Rojas R (1996) Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer, Berlin
Schwartz MW (2006) How conservation scientists can help develop social capital for biodiversity. Cons Biol 20:1550–1552
Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471
Theobald EJ et al (2015) Global change and local solutions: tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biol Cons 181:236–244
Turner W, Rondinini C, Pettorelli N, Mora B, Leidner AK, Szantoi Z, Buchanan G, Dech S, Dwyer J, Herold M, Koh LP, Leimgruber P, Taubenboeck H, Wegmann M, Wikelski M, Woodcock C (2015) Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biol Cons 182:173–176
Vianna GMS, Meekan MG, Bornovski TH, Meeuwig JJ (2014) Acoustic telemetry validates a citizen science approach for monitoring sharks on coral reefs. PLoS ONE 9:e95565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095565
Whitelaw G, Vaughan H, Craig B, Atkinson D (2003) Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. Environ Mon Assess 88:409–418
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to E. Alleva for intellectual support on this idea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vukelic, M., Mancini, F., Vukelic, D. et al. A cetacean monitoring system that integrates citizen science and satellite imagery. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 29, 53–59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-017-0657-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-017-0657-4