Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-risk mesothelioma relation to meteorological and geological condition and distance from naturally occurring asbestos

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 January 2016

Abstract

Objectives

Very few studies have investigated the incidence and risk of malignant mesothelioma (MM) associated with distinct sources of asbestos exposure, especially exposure to naturally occurring asbestos (NOA).

Methods

Subjects were MM, lung, and breast cancer patients who were diagnosed and followed in Diyarbakir Province between 2008 and 2013. The birthplaces of patients were displayed on a geologic map. Geological and meteorological effects on MM were analyzed by logistic regression.

Results

A total of 180 MM, 368 breast, and 406 lung cancer patients were included. The median distance from birthplace to ophiolites was 6.26 km for MM, 31.06 km for lung, and 34.31 km for breast cancer (p < 0.001). The majority of MM cases were seen within 20 km from NOA areas. The MM incidence inside of NOA was 1059/100.000, and out of NOA was 397/100.000; this difference was significant (p = 0.014). The largest concentration of MM residential areas was within ±30° (34 residential areas 36.6 %) of the dominant wind direction. Most MM patients were found in or near the dominant wind direction, especially in the acute angle defined by the dominant wind direction. MM incidence was directly proportional to {[area of NOA (km2)] * [cosine α of wind direction angle]} and was inversely proportional to the square of the distance (R = 0.291, p = 0.023).

Conclusions

MM was higher near NOA and in the downwind direction. MM incidence and risk were affected by geological and meteorological factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Indust Med. 1960;17:266–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanrikulu AC, Senyigit A, Dagli CE, Babayigit C, Abakay A. Environmental malignant pleural mesothelioma in Southeast Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2006;27:1605–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayram M, Bakan ND. Environmental exposure to asbestos: from geology to mesothelioma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20(3):301–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen J, de Klerk NH, Musk AW, Hobbs MS. Environmental exposure to crocidolite and mesothelioma: exposure-response relationships. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abratt RP, Vorobiof DA, White N. Asbestos and mesothelioma in South Africa. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnani C, Dalmasso P, Biggeri A, Ivaldi C, Mirabelli D, Terracini B. Increased risk of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura after residential or domestic exposure to asbestos: a case-control study in Casale Monferrato, Italy. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:915–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Manda-Stachouli C, Dalavanga Y, Daskalopoulos G, Leontaridi C, Vassiliou M, Constantopoulos SH. Decreasing prevalence of pleural calcifications among Metsovites with nonoccupational asbestos exposure. Chest. 2004;126:617–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luce D, Bugel I, Goldberg P, et al. Environmental exposure to tremolite and respiratory cancer in New Caledonia: a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:259–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo S, Liu X, Mu S. Asbestos related diseases from environmental exposure to crocidolite in Da-yao, China: I: review of exposure and epidemiological data. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernardini P, Schettino B, Sperduto B, Giannandrea F, Burragato F, Castellino N. Three cases of pleural mesothelioma and environmental pollution with tremolite outcrops in Lucania. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2003;25:408–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Orenstein MR, Schenker MB. Environmental asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2000;6:371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salih E, Ahmet UD. Malignant pleural mesothelioma in Turkey, 2000–2002 [review]. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:S17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanrikulu AC, Abakay A, Kaplan MA, et al. A clinical, radiographic and laboratory evaluation of prognostic factors in 363 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Respiration. 2010;80(6):480–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarrés J, Albertí C, Martínez-Artés X, et al. Pleural mesothelioma in relation to meteorological conditions and residential distance from an industrial source of asbestos. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(8):588–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan XL, Day HW, Wang W, Beckett LA, Schenker MB. Residential proximity to naturally occurring asbestos and mesothelioma risk in California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(8):1019–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurumatani N, Kumagai S. Mapping the risk of mesothelioma due to neighborhood asbestos exposure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(6):624–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagci U. The geochemistry and petrology of the ophiolitic rocks from the Kahramanmaraş region, southern Turkey. Turkish J Earth Sci. 2013;22:536–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. http://www.mta.gov.tr/v2.0/eng/maps/images/1-500/ERZURUM.jpg. Accessed date 25 Feb 2015.

  19. Cureoglu S, Meriç F, Topçu I, Osma U, Akkus Z, Celik Y. The relationship between meteorological parameters and the frequency of secretory otitis media. Otoskop Dergisi. 2000;1:25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T C Ministry of environment and forests. General Directorate of State Meteorological Affairs. Provincial Status Report. Prepared by. State Meteorology Affairs General Directorate of Strategy Development Department 2008, p 42 www2.cevreorman.gov.tr/durum_rapor/dmi/dmi.doc.

  21. Selçuk ZT, Cöplü L, Emri S, Kalyoncu AF, Sahin AA, Bariş YI. Malignant pleural mesothelioma due to environmental mineral fiber exposure in Turkey: analysis of 135 cases. Chest. 1992;102:790–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Senyigit A, Dalgic A, Kavak O, Tanrikulu AC. Determination of environmental exposure to asbestos (tremolite) and mesothelioma risks in the southeastern region of Turkey. Arch Environ Health. 2004;59(12):658–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayram M, Dongel I, Bakan ND, et al. High risk of malignant mesothelioma and pleural plaques in subjects born close to ophiolites. Chest. 2013;143(1):164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yılmaz Y. New evidence and model on the evolution of the Southeast Anatolian orogen. Bull Geol Soc Am. 1993;105:251–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Döngel I, Bayram M, Bakan ND, Yalçın H, Gültürk S. Is living close to ophiolites related to asbestos related diseases? Cross-sectional study. Respir Med. 2013;107(6):870–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hubaux R, Becker-Santos DD, Enfield KS, Lam S, Lam WL, Martinez VD. Arsenic, asbestos and radon: emerging players in lung tumorigenesis. Environ Health. 2012;11:89–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Laamane A, Noro L, Raunio V. Observations on atmospheric air pollution caused by asbestos. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965;132:240–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parlak O, Rizaoglu T, Bagci U, Karaoglan F, Höck V. Tectonic significance of the geochemistry and petrology of ophiolites in southeast Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics. 2009;473:173–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilic AD. Petrogenesis of subduction zone and dunite bodies. J Earth Sci Eng. 2012;2:377–86.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Akinci OT. Ophiolite-hosted copper and gold deposits of Southeastern Turkey: formation and relationship with seafloor hydrothermal processes. Turkish J Earth Sci. 2009;18:475–509.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was not financially supported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdurrahman Abakay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Dicle University Ethics Committee obtained ethical approval.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abakay, A., Tanrikulu, A.C., Ayhan, M. et al. High-risk mesothelioma relation to meteorological and geological condition and distance from naturally occurring asbestos. Environ Health Prev Med 21, 82–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-015-0501-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-015-0501-3

Keywords

Navigation