Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agricultural Management of Switchgrass for Fuel Quality and Thermal Energy Yield on Highly Erodible Land in the Driftless Area of Southwest Wisconsin

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Converting row crop production to a perennial grass crop on highly erodible land has numerous benefits. Switchgrass, grown as a biofuel crop, can provide soil conservation benefits as a perennial crop and also provide economic value to the grower. However, little information exists regarding switchgrass management and production on these lands. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of two management practices, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate (0, 56, 112, 168, and 224 kg ha−1) and harvest timing (mid-fall, late-fall, and spring), on: (1) dry matter (DM) yield, (2) switchgrass quality components (moisture, ash, and chloride (Cl) concentrations), and (3) combustion energy content and yield. The study was conducted in 2009 and 2010 on highly erodible lands in the Driftless Area of southwest Wisconsin. Results showed a positive response of switchgrass DM to N fertilizer, with no yield gain above 112 kg ha−1 of N, although application of N increased Cl concentrations. Harvest timing also affected switchgrass yield, with decreases in yield observed with progressively later harvest timings; this yield decrease was slightly greater compared with previous studies. Progressively later harvest timings led to a decrease in moisture, ash concentration, and Cl concentration in both years. Energy content of switchgrass was not significantly affected by management. Energy yields, similar to DM yields, were maximized with 112 kg ha−1 of N with a mid-fall harvest. The similarities between this study and other research indicate there is a universal response of switchgrass to N in the northern USA and yields determined in this study indicate that highly erodible lands in the Driftless Area can be used to produce switchgrass at regionally expected yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tolbert VR, Todd DE, Mann LK, Jawdy CM, Mays DA, Malik R, Bandaranayake W, Houston A, Tyler D, Pettry DE (2002) Changes in soil quality and below-ground carbon storage with conversion of traditional agricultural crop lands to bioenergy crop production. Environ Pollut 116:S97–S106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass for a feedstock for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion ton annual supply. DOE/GO-102995-2135 ORNL/TM-2005/66, Oakridge, TN, USA

  3. Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW, Lafreniere L (2009) Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43:6094–6100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aravindhakshan SC, Epplin FM, Taliaferro CM (2010) Economics of switchgrass and miscanthus relative to coal as feedstock for generating electricity. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1375–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohenstein WG, Wright LL (1994) Biomass energy production in the United States: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 6:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME (1998) Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 14:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh ME, Ugarte DGD, Shapouri H, Slinsky SP (2003) Bioenergy crop production in the United States—potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector. Environ Resour Econ 24:313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Nashaar HM, Banowetz GM, Griffith SM, Casler MD, Vogel KP (2009) Genotypic variability in mineral composition of switchgrass. Bioresource Technol 100:1809–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Plochl M, Amon T, Hobbs PJ (2009) Bioenergy from permanent grassland—a review: 2. Combustion. Bioresource Technol 100:4945–4954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Turhollow A, Kumar A, Bransby D, Lynd L, Laser M (2009) Large-scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)—current technology and envisioning a mature technology. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 3:124–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doerin OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM, Parton WJ, Adler PR, Barney JN, Cruse RM (2008) Agriculture—sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Driftless Area Initiative (2005) Defining the “Driftless Area.” http://www.driftlessareainitiative.org/aboutus/defining_driftless.cfm. Accessed 28 March 2013

  13. Albert DA (1995) Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-178. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station

  14. Natural Resource Conservation Service (2012) National soil survey handbook, Title 430 VI, Part. 622.02—Land Capability Classification. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/contents/part622.html. Accessed 28 March 2013

  15. Ventura S, Hull S, Jackson R, Radloff G, Sample D, Walling S, Wiliams C (2012) Guidelines for sustainable planting and harvest of nonforest biomass in Wisconsin. J Soil Water Conserv 67:17A–21A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP (2004) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C-4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenergy 27:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28:515–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2005) The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:423–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinners KJ, Boettcher GC, Muck RE, Weimer PJ, Casler MD (2010) Harvest and storage of two perennial grasses as biomass feedstocks. Trans ASABE 53:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hadders G, Olsson R (1997) Harvest of grass for combustion in late summer and in spring. Biomass Bioenergy 12:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Boateng AA, Weimer PI, Jung HJG (2006) Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agron J 98:1518–1525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanderson MA, Reed ML, McLaughlin SB, Wullschleger SD, Conger BV, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Taliaferro C, Hopkins AA, Ocumpaugh WR, Hussey MA, Read JC, Tischler CR (1996) Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop. Bioresour Technol 56:83–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Rodríguez LF, Ting KC (2012) Switchgrass—practical issues in developing a fuel crop. CAB Reviews 7:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewandowski I, Kicherer A (1997) Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus x giganteus. European J Agron J 6:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brechbill SC, Tyner WE, Ileleji KE (2011) The economics of biomass collection and transportation and its supply to Indiana cellulosic and electric utility facilities. BioEnergy Res 4:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR Jr, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54:17–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baxter LL, Miles TR, Jenkins BM, Milne T, Dayton D, Bryers RW, Oden LL (1998) The behavior of inorganic material in biomass-fired power boilers: field and laboratory experiences. Fuel Process Technol 54:47–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Obernberger I, Brunner T, Barnthaler G (2006) Chemical properties of solid biofuels—significance and impact. Biomass Bioenergy 30:973–982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miesel JR, Renz MJ, Doll JE, Jackson RD (2012) Effectiveness of weed management methods in establishement of switchgrass and a native species mixture for biofuels in Wisconsin. Biomass Bioenergy 36:121–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. International Organization of Standardization (2009) Solid mineral fuels—determination of gross calorific value by the bomb calorimetric method and calculation of net calorific value. ISO 1928:2009, Geneva, Switzerland

  33. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Burras CL, Moore KJ, Barker MF, Molstad NE (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in larger fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1187–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee DK, Owens VN, Doolittle JJ (2007) Switchgrass and soil carbon sequestration response to ammonium nitrate, manure, and harvest frequency on conservation reserve program land. Agron J 99:462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nikièma P, Rothstein DE, Min D, Kapp CJ (2011) Nitrogen fertilization of switchgrass increases biomass yields and improves net greenhouse balance in northern Michigan, U.S.A. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4356–4367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sawyer JE, Hanna M, Petersen D (2010) Energy conservation in corn nitrogen fertilization. PM 2089i. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM2089I.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2012

  37. Wullschleger SD, Davis EB, Borsuk ME, Gunderson CA, Lynd LR (2010) Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield. Agron J 102:1158–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Casler MD, Boe AR (2003) Cultivar × environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sanderson MA, Adler PR (2008) Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. International J Molecular Sci 9:768–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Monti A, Fazio S, Venturi G (2009) The discrepancy between plot and field yields: harvest and storage losses of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 33:841–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Moore KJ, Molstad NE, Burras CL, Barker MF (2002) Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 23:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494), a grant by the State of Wisconsin’s Office of Energy Independence, and a grant from USDA Hatch and University of Wisconsin-Madison (project No. WIS01541). The authors would also like to recognize the contributions of Mack Naber, Peter Wakeman, Anna Tapsieva, Julie Doll, Madeline Raudenbush, and Jessica Miesel for their assistance on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. Ruark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoagland, K.C., Ruark, M.D., Renz, M.J. et al. Agricultural Management of Switchgrass for Fuel Quality and Thermal Energy Yield on Highly Erodible Land in the Driftless Area of Southwest Wisconsin. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 1012–1021 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9335-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9335-2

Keywords

Navigation