Abstract
Converting row crop production to a perennial grass crop on highly erodible land has numerous benefits. Switchgrass, grown as a biofuel crop, can provide soil conservation benefits as a perennial crop and also provide economic value to the grower. However, little information exists regarding switchgrass management and production on these lands. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of two management practices, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate (0, 56, 112, 168, and 224 kg ha−1) and harvest timing (mid-fall, late-fall, and spring), on: (1) dry matter (DM) yield, (2) switchgrass quality components (moisture, ash, and chloride (Cl−) concentrations), and (3) combustion energy content and yield. The study was conducted in 2009 and 2010 on highly erodible lands in the Driftless Area of southwest Wisconsin. Results showed a positive response of switchgrass DM to N fertilizer, with no yield gain above 112 kg ha−1 of N, although application of N increased Cl− concentrations. Harvest timing also affected switchgrass yield, with decreases in yield observed with progressively later harvest timings; this yield decrease was slightly greater compared with previous studies. Progressively later harvest timings led to a decrease in moisture, ash concentration, and Cl− concentration in both years. Energy content of switchgrass was not significantly affected by management. Energy yields, similar to DM yields, were maximized with 112 kg ha−1 of N with a mid-fall harvest. The similarities between this study and other research indicate there is a universal response of switchgrass to N in the northern USA and yields determined in this study indicate that highly erodible lands in the Driftless Area can be used to produce switchgrass at regionally expected yields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tolbert VR, Todd DE, Mann LK, Jawdy CM, Mays DA, Malik R, Bandaranayake W, Houston A, Tyler D, Pettry DE (2002) Changes in soil quality and below-ground carbon storage with conversion of traditional agricultural crop lands to bioenergy crop production. Environ Pollut 116:S97–S106
Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass for a feedstock for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion ton annual supply. DOE/GO-102995-2135 ORNL/TM-2005/66, Oakridge, TN, USA
Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW, Lafreniere L (2009) Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43:6094–6100
Aravindhakshan SC, Epplin FM, Taliaferro CM (2010) Economics of switchgrass and miscanthus relative to coal as feedstock for generating electricity. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1375–1383
Hohenstein WG, Wright LL (1994) Biomass energy production in the United States: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 6:161–173
McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME (1998) Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 14:317–324
Walsh ME, Ugarte DGD, Shapouri H, Slinsky SP (2003) Bioenergy crop production in the United States—potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector. Environ Resour Econ 24:313–333
El-Nashaar HM, Banowetz GM, Griffith SM, Casler MD, Vogel KP (2009) Genotypic variability in mineral composition of switchgrass. Bioresource Technol 100:1809–1814
Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Plochl M, Amon T, Hobbs PJ (2009) Bioenergy from permanent grassland—a review: 2. Combustion. Bioresource Technol 100:4945–4954
Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Turhollow A, Kumar A, Bransby D, Lynd L, Laser M (2009) Large-scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)—current technology and envisioning a mature technology. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 3:124–141
Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doerin OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM, Parton WJ, Adler PR, Barney JN, Cruse RM (2008) Agriculture—sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49
Driftless Area Initiative (2005) Defining the “Driftless Area.” http://www.driftlessareainitiative.org/aboutus/defining_driftless.cfm. Accessed 28 March 2013
Albert DA (1995) Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-178. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Natural Resource Conservation Service (2012) National soil survey handbook, Title 430 VI, Part. 622.02—Land Capability Classification. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/contents/part622.html. Accessed 28 March 2013
Ventura S, Hull S, Jackson R, Radloff G, Sample D, Walling S, Wiliams C (2012) Guidelines for sustainable planting and harvest of nonforest biomass in Wisconsin. J Soil Water Conserv 67:17A–21A
Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP (2004) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C-4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenergy 27:21–30
McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28:515–535
Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420
Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2005) The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:423–459
Shinners KJ, Boettcher GC, Muck RE, Weimer PJ, Casler MD (2010) Harvest and storage of two perennial grasses as biomass feedstocks. Trans ASABE 53:359–370
Hadders G, Olsson R (1997) Harvest of grass for combustion in late summer and in spring. Biomass Bioenergy 12:171–175
Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Boateng AA, Weimer PI, Jung HJG (2006) Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agron J 98:1518–1525
Sanderson MA, Reed ML, McLaughlin SB, Wullschleger SD, Conger BV, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Taliaferro C, Hopkins AA, Ocumpaugh WR, Hussey MA, Read JC, Tischler CR (1996) Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop. Bioresour Technol 56:83–93
Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Rodríguez LF, Ting KC (2012) Switchgrass—practical issues in developing a fuel crop. CAB Reviews 7:1–14
Lewandowski I, Kicherer A (1997) Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus x giganteus. European J Agron J 6:163–177
McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46
Brechbill SC, Tyner WE, Ileleji KE (2011) The economics of biomass collection and transportation and its supply to Indiana cellulosic and electric utility facilities. BioEnergy Res 4:141–152
Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR Jr, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54:17–46
Baxter LL, Miles TR, Jenkins BM, Milne T, Dayton D, Bryers RW, Oden LL (1998) The behavior of inorganic material in biomass-fired power boilers: field and laboratory experiences. Fuel Process Technol 54:47–78
Obernberger I, Brunner T, Barnthaler G (2006) Chemical properties of solid biofuels—significance and impact. Biomass Bioenergy 30:973–982
Miesel JR, Renz MJ, Doll JE, Jackson RD (2012) Effectiveness of weed management methods in establishement of switchgrass and a native species mixture for biofuels in Wisconsin. Biomass Bioenergy 36:121–131
International Organization of Standardization (2009) Solid mineral fuels—determination of gross calorific value by the bomb calorimetric method and calculation of net calorific value. ISO 1928:2009, Geneva, Switzerland
Lemus R, Brummer EC, Burras CL, Moore KJ, Barker MF, Molstad NE (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in larger fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1187–1194
Lee DK, Owens VN, Doolittle JJ (2007) Switchgrass and soil carbon sequestration response to ammonium nitrate, manure, and harvest frequency on conservation reserve program land. Agron J 99:462–468
Nikièma P, Rothstein DE, Min D, Kapp CJ (2011) Nitrogen fertilization of switchgrass increases biomass yields and improves net greenhouse balance in northern Michigan, U.S.A. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4356–4367
Sawyer JE, Hanna M, Petersen D (2010) Energy conservation in corn nitrogen fertilization. PM 2089i. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM2089I.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2012
Wullschleger SD, Davis EB, Borsuk ME, Gunderson CA, Lynd LR (2010) Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield. Agron J 102:1158–1168
Casler MD, Boe AR (2003) Cultivar × environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233
Sanderson MA, Adler PR (2008) Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. International J Molecular Sci 9:768–788
Monti A, Fazio S, Venturi G (2009) The discrepancy between plot and field yields: harvest and storage losses of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 33:841–847
Lemus R, Brummer EC, Moore KJ, Molstad NE, Burras CL, Barker MF (2002) Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 23:433–442
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494), a grant by the State of Wisconsin’s Office of Energy Independence, and a grant from USDA Hatch and University of Wisconsin-Madison (project No. WIS01541). The authors would also like to recognize the contributions of Mack Naber, Peter Wakeman, Anna Tapsieva, Julie Doll, Madeline Raudenbush, and Jessica Miesel for their assistance on this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoagland, K.C., Ruark, M.D., Renz, M.J. et al. Agricultural Management of Switchgrass for Fuel Quality and Thermal Energy Yield on Highly Erodible Land in the Driftless Area of Southwest Wisconsin. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 1012–1021 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9335-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9335-2