Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal Dynamics of Aboveground and Belowground Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation and Remobilization in Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): A Three-Year Study on Marginal Land

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) is a perennial rhizomatous grass that shows promise as a bioenergy crop in the Mediterranean environment. The species has spread throughout the world, catalyzed by human activity, though also as a result of its intrinsic robustness, adaptability, and versatility. Giant reed is able to thrive across a wide range of soil types and is tolerant to drought, salinity, and flooding. This tolerance to environmental stresses is significant and could mean that growing energy crops on marginal land is one possible strategy for reducing competition for land with food production and for improving soil quality. We devised an experiment in which we cultivated giant reed in a sandy loam soil with low nutrient availability. Our goal was to evaluate the dynamics of aboveground and belowground biomass and assess the nutrient dynamics of this grass species, focusing particularly on nutrient accumulation and remobilization. The species demonstrated good productivity potential: In the third year, aboveground dry biomass yield reached around 20 t ha−1, with a corresponding rhizome dry biomass yield of 16 t ha−1. Results for this species were characterized by low nutrient contents in the aboveground biomass at the end of the growing season, and its rhizome proved able to support growth over the spring period and to store nutrients in the autumn. Nevertheless, the adaptability of giant reed to marginal land and the role of its belowground biomass should be investigated over the long-term, and any further research should focus on its potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and maintain soil fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 25:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosentino S, Copani V, Patanè C, Mantineo M, D’Agosta G (2008) Agronomic, energetic and environmental aspects of biomass energy crops suitable for Italian environments. Ital J Agron 2:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, Nassi o Di Nasso N, Bonari E (2009) Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus × giganteus in a long term field experiment in central Italy: analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass Bioenergy 33:635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariani C, Cabrini R, Danin A, Piffanelli P, Fricano A, Gomarasca S, Dicandilo M, Grassi F, Soave C (2010) Origin, diffusion and reproduction of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.): a promising weedy energy crop. Ann Appl Biol 157:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duke AJ (1983) Handbook of energy crops. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Arundo_donax.html. Accessed 08 March 2012

  6. Perdue RE (1958) Arundo donax—source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ Bot 12:368–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Tomaso JM, Healey EA (2003) Aquatic and riparian weeds of the west. University of California–ANR Pub 3421. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 254–262

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bell G (1997) Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. In: Brock JH, Wade M, Pysek P, Green D (eds) Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe. Blackhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 103–113

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan JS, Tiller KH, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart NR, Stewart CN Jr (2008) Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci 13:421–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 101:1570–1580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, Bonari E (2005) Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices. Eur J Agron 22:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, Patanè C, Cosentino SL (2009) Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Res 114:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nassi o Di Nasso N, Roncucci N, Triana F, Tozzini C, Bonari E (2011) Productivity of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter) as energy crops: growth analysis. Ital J Agron 6:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beale CV, Long SP (1997) Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides. Biomass Bioenergy 12:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Himken M, Lammel J, Neukirchen D, Czypionka-Krause U, Olfs H-W (1997) Cultivation of Miscanthus under west European conditions: seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization. Plant Soil 189:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strullu L, Cadoux S, Preudhomme M, Jeuffroy M-H, Beaudoin N (2011) Biomass production and nitrogen accumulation and remobilisation by Miscanthus × giganteus as influenced by nitrogen stocks in belowground organs. Field Crop Res 121:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dohleman FG, Heaton EA, Arundale RA, Long SP (2012) Seasonal dynamics of above- and belowground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing. GCB Bioenergy. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x

  18. Monti A, Zatta A (2009) Root distribution and soil moisture retrieval in perennial and annual energy crops in northern Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 132:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nassi o Di Nasso N, Angelini LG, Bonari E (2009) Improving energy crop cultivation in the Mediterranean region: nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiency in giant reed (Arundo donax L.). 16th Nitrogen Workshop–Connecting different scales of nitrogen use in agriculture, Torino, pp 321–322

  20. Lambers H, Chapin III, Pons FSTL (2008) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York, p 610

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP (2009) Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum. GCB Bioenergy 1:297–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma KP, Kushwaha SPS, Gopal B (1999) Nutrient dynamics in an Arundo donax wetland: nutrient uptake, seasonal changes in tissue concentration, and release during in situ decomposition. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 25:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nassi o Di Nasso N, Roncucci N, Triana F, Tozzini C, Bonari E (2011) Seasonal nutrient dynamics and biomass quality of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter) as energy crops. Ital J Agron 6:152–158

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fahd S, Fiorentino G, Mellino S, Ulgiati S (2012) Cropping bioenergy and biomaterials in marginal land: the added value of the biorefinery concept. Energy 37:79–93

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hunt R (2003) Growth analysis, individual plants. In: Thomas B, Murphy DJ, Murray D (eds) Encyclopaedia of applied plant sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 579–588

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bradstreet RB (1965) The Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen, Academic Press (New York), pp viii+239

  27. Bagnouls F, Gaussen H (1957) Les climats biologiques et leur classification. Ann Geogr 355:193–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kering MK, Butler TJ, Biermacher JT, Guretzky JA (2012) Biomass yield and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses under nitrogen fertilization. Bioenergy Res 5:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Knoll JE, Anderson WF, Strickland TC, Hubbard RK, Malik R (2012) Low-input production of biomass from perennial grasses in the coastal plain of Georgia, USA. Bioenerg Res 5:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cosentino SL, Copani V, D’Agosta GM, Sanzone E, Mantineo M (2006) First results on evaluation of Arundo donax L. clones collected in southern Italy. Ind Crop Prod 23:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kätterer T, Andrén O (1999) Growth dynamics of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its allocation of biomass and nitrogen below ground in a field receiving daily irrigation and fertilisation. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 54:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, van den Bygaart AJ (2007) An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Papazoglou EG (2007) Arundo donax L. stress tolerance under irrigation with heavy metal aqueous solutions. Desalination 211:304–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cadoux S, Riche AB, Yates NE, Machet J-M (2012) Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus × giganteus: conclusions from a review of published studies. Biomass Bioenergy 38:14–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. White PJ (2012) Ion uptake mechanisms of individual cells and roots: short-distance transport. In: Marschner P (ed) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 7–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Hawkesford M, Horst W, Kichey T, Lambers H, Schjoerring J, Møller IS, White PJ (2012) Functions of macronutrients. In: Marschner P (ed) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 135–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith R, Slater FM (2011) Mobilization of minerals and moisture loss during senescence of the energy crops Miscanthus × giganteus, Arundo donax and Phalaris arundinacea, in Wales, UK. GCB Bioenergy 3:148–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MiPAAF) within the BIOSEA project, Optimization of bioenergy chains for an economic and environmental sustainability.

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical staff of the CRIBE and of the Institute of Life Sciences, particularly Fabio Taccini, Sergio Cattani, and Cristiano Tozzini. Special thanks are also due to Federico Triana, Federico Dragoni, Maria Valentina Lasorella, Valentina Giulietti, and Giorgio Ragaglini for their comments and suggestions. Finally, we thank the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Nassi o Di Nasso.

Additional information

Nicoletta Nassi o Di Nasso and Neri Roncucci contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nassi o Di Nasso, N., Roncucci, N. & Bonari, E. Seasonal Dynamics of Aboveground and Belowground Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation and Remobilization in Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): A Three-Year Study on Marginal Land. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 725–736 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9289-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9289-9

Keywords

Navigation