Abstract
Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) are large perennial grass bioenergy crops in the USA and Europe. Despite much research into their agronomic potential, few studies have examined in situ root growth dynamics under irrigation and soil water deficits, particularly as they relate to shoot performance. We grew miscanthus and switchgrass in outdoor mesocosms under irrigated and rainfed conditions and assessed the spatial distribution and abundance of roots using minirhizotron images and whole root system sampling. Despite surviving an extended period of drought, shoot and root biomass, root length density, numbers of culms, and culm height were reduced in both species under rainfed (dry) conditions. However, rainfed switchgrass far outperformed rainfed miscanthus in all shoot and root growth metrics. The rainfed (drought) treatment reduced switchgrass and miscanthus whole plant biomass by 83 and 98 %, culm production by 67 and 90 %, and root length density by 67 and 94 % compared to irrigated plants, respectively. Root nitrogen concentration was higher for miscanthus (3-fold) and switchgrass (4-fold) in the rainfed treatment compared to irrigated plants and did not significantly differ between species. Unlike miscanthus, switchgrass grew roots continuously into regions of available soil moisture as surface soil layers grew increasingly dry, indicating a drought avoidance strategy. Our study suggests that switchgrass is more likely to tolerate drought by mining deep wet soils, while miscanthus relies on shallow rhizome production to tolerate dry soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conner D, Hernandez C (2009) Crops for biofuels: current status and prospects for the future. In: Bringezu RWHS (ed) Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p p 65
Simmons BA, Loque D, Blanch HW (2008) Next-generation biomass feedstocks for biofuel production. Genome Biol 9:242. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-242
Georgescu M, Lobell DB, Field CB (2011) Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 108:4307–4312
Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:351–377
Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Almeida J, Boleo S, Mendes B (2010) Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in Europe. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 4:594–604
Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L et al (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271
Schneider R, Kowalczyk K, Welch R, Wells K, Smith H, Coye-Huhn S, Garret G, Pyter R (2011) In: USDA (ed) Proposed BCAP for miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) establishment and production in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. USDA, Washington, DC
Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 101:1570–1580
Jessup RW (2009) Development and status of dedicated energy crops in the United States. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:282–290
Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP (2008) Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of miscanthus. Glob Chang Biol 14:2000–2014
Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 25:335–361
Energy Independence and Security Act (2007) in H.R. 2007: USA
McDonald RI, Fargione J, Kiesecker J, Miller WM, Powell J (2009) Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy impacts on natural habitat for the United States of America. PLoS One 4(8):e6802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006802
Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM et al (2008) Agriculture—sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49–50
Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB (2008) Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol Evol 23:65–72
US Department of Energy (2011) US billion ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Perlack RD, Stokes BJ (Leads) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
Chapotin SM, Wolt JD (2007) Genetically modified crops for the bioeconomy: meeting public and regulatory expectations. Transgenic Res 16:675–688
Barney JN, DiTomaso JM (2010) Bioclimatic predictions of habitat suitability for the biofuel switchgrass in North America under current and future climate scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 34:124–133
Zub HW, Brancourt-Hulmel M (2010) Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:201–214
Barney JN, Mann JJ, Kyser GB, Blumwald E, Van Deynze A, DiTomaso JM (2009) Tolerance of switchgrass to extreme soil moisture stress: ecological implications. Plant Sci 177:724–732
Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP (2009) Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 1:297–307
Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Bangerth F, Jones MB (2002) Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus. New Phytol 154:335–345
Richardson DM, Blanchard R (2010) Learning from our mistakes: minimizing problems with invasive biofuel plants. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:36–42
The Royal Society (2008) Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges. The Royal Society, London, p 90
Barney JN, DiTomaso JM (2008) Nonnative species and bioenergy: are we cultivating the next invader? Bioscience 58:64–70
Khanna M, Dhungana B, Clifton-Brown J (2008) Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass Bioenergy 32:482–493
Glowacka K (2011) A review of the genetic study of the energy crop Miscanthus. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2445–2454
Stewart RJ, Toma Y, Fernandez FG, Nishiwaki A, Yamada T, Bollero GA (2009) The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review. GCB Bioenergy 1:126–153
Monti A, Zatta A (2009) Root distribution and soil moisture retrieval in perennial and annual energy crops in Northern Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 132:252–259
Neukirchen D, Himken M, Lammel J, Czyionka-Krause U, Olfs HW (1999) Spatial and temporal distribution of the root system and root nutrient content of an established Miscanthus crop. Eur J Agron 11:301–309
Ma Z, Wood CW, Bransby DI (2000) Impacts of soil management on root characteristics of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 18:105–112
Strzepek K, Boehlert B (2010) Competition for water for the food system. Phil Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 365:2927–2940
Schnoor JL (2008) ENVR 187—water implications of biofuels production in the United States. Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc 235:187
Schroter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araujo MB, Arnell NW et al (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310:1333–1337
Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP (2004) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenergy 27:21–30
Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Kjeldsen JB et al (2001) Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe. Agron J 93:1013–1019
Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I (2000) Water use efficiency and biomass partitioning of three different Miscanthus genotypes with limited and unlimited water supply. Ann Bot 86:191–200
Barney JN, DiTomaso JM (2010) Invasive species biology, ecology, management and risk assessment: evaluating and mitigating the invasion risk of biofuel crops. In: Mascia PN et al (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Springer, New York, pp 263–284
Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289
Samson BK, Sinclair TR (1994) Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density. Plant Soil 161:225–232
AOAC Official Method 972.43 (2006) Microchemical determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen, automated method, in Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed, Rev 1, Chapter 12. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, pp 5–6
Lambers H, Chapin III FS, Pons TL (eds) (2008) Plant physiological ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Neumann PM (2008) Coping mechanisms for crop plants in drought-prone environments. Ann Bot 101:901–907
Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J Ecol 90:480–494
Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ 25:251–263
Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264
Eggemeyer KD, Awada T, Harvey FE, Wedin DA, Zhou X, Zanner CW (2009) Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland. Tree Physiol 29:157–169
Knapp AK (1985) Effect of fire and drought on the ecophysiology of Andropogon gerardii and Panicum virgatum in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 66:1309–1320
Heckathorn SA, DeLucia EH (1994) Drought induced nitrogen retranslocation in perennial C4 grasses of tallgrass prairie. Ecology 75:1877–1886
Barker DJ, Sullivan CY, Moser LE (1993) Water deficit effects on osmotic potential, cell-wall elasticity, and proline in five grasses. Agron J 85:270–275
Weng JH (1993) Photosynthesis of different ecotypes of Miscanthus spp. as affected by water stress. Photosynthetica 29:43–48
Dept. of Environment FaRAS (2007) Planting and growing miscanthus: best practice guidelines. http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/miscanthus-guide_tcm6-4263.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2012
Davis SC, Parton WJ, Dohleman FG, Smith CM, Del Grosso S, Kent AD et al (2010) Comparative biogeochemical cycles of bioenergy crops reveal nitrogen-fixation and low greenhouse gas emissions in a Miscanthus × giganteus agro-ecosystem. Ecosystems 13:144–156
Collins HP, Smith JL, Fransen S, Alva AK, Kruger CE, Granatstein DM (2010) Carbon sequestration under irrigated switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) production. Soil Sci Soc Am J Abs 74:2049–2058
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Jimin Zhang for help with data collection and Dr. Chris van Kessel for reviewing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mann, J.J., Barney, J.N., Kyser, G.B. et al. Root System Dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum in Response to Rainfed and Irrigated Conditions in California. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 678–687 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9287-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9287-y