Skip to main content
Log in

Social Capital, Frequency of Media Exposure, and Subject Well-Being: Based on 2015 CGSS Data in China

  • Published:
East Asia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between social capital, frequency of media exposure, and subject well-being while adequately controlling for other variables in China. This study was based on 2015 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) and the multilevel regression analyses analysis, empirically estimating the impact of social capital and frequency of media exposure on subject well-being (SWB) in China. The results are as follows: (1) Social capital has a significant positive impact on improving subject well-being of the residents, as the more social capital they have, the happier they become; (2) frequency of reading the newspapers and magazines is positively related to social capital; (3) both watching television and listening to the radio are positively associated with subject well-being although there are no positive relations between watching television and listening to the radio with social capital; and (4) the relationship between frequency of using the Internet, using mobile devices to receive information, and social capital with subject well-being shows no significant effect. Limitation and directions for future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diener, E. (Ed.) (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener. Springer Science.

  3. Fordyce, M.W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measure: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20(4). 355-381.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veenhoven, R. (2015). Informed pursuit of happiness: What we should know, do know and can get to know. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 1035-1071.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchflower, D.G., & Oswald, A.J. (2004).Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359-1386.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.J., & Osward, A.J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4). 809-826.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leung, A., Kier, A., Fung, T., & Fung, L. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 443-462.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orviska, M., Caplanova, A., & Hudson, J. (2012). The impact of democracy on well-being. Social Indicators Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-9997-8.

  10. Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 421-430.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cramm, J.M., Moller, V., & Nieboer, A.P. (2012). Individual and neighborhood level indicators of subjective well-being in a small and poor Eastern Cape township: The effect of health, social capital, marital status, and income. Social Indicator Research, 105(3), 581-593

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deneulin, S., & Townsend, N. (2007). Public goods. Global public goods and the common good. International Journal of Social Economics, 34, 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human a lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M.W. Reder (Eds). Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Mose Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.

  14. Fischer, C. S. (2008). What wealth-happiness paradox? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9,219-226.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xing, Z.J. (2011). A study on the relationship between Chinese residents’ income and their subjective well-being (in Chinese).Sociological studies, 1, 197-219.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Easterlin, R.A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35-47.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Easterlin, R.A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China life satisfaction, 1990-2010. PNAS, 109, 9975-9780

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2011) “Communiqué of the National Bureau of Statistics of People’s Republic of China on Major Figures of the 2010 Population Census”. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/NewsEvents/201104/t20110429_26450.html.

  19. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wakefield, S.E., Poland, B. (2005). Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development. Social Science & Medicine, 60(12), 2819-2832.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ateca-Amestoy, V., Aguilar, A.C., & Moro-Egido, A.I. (2014). Social interactions and life satisfaction: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 527-554.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helliwell, J.F., & Barrington-Leigh, C.P. (2010). How much is social capital worth? In J. Jetten, C. Haslam & S.A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure (pp.55-71). London: Psychology Press

  23. Portela, M., Neira, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jimenez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493-511.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meng, T., & Chen, H. (2014). A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-rated health: Evidence from China. Health & Place, 27, 38-44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cuñado, J., & Pérez de Gracia, F (2012). Does media consumption make us happy? Evidence for Spain. Journal of Media Economics, 25, 8-34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stanca, L. (2016). Happiness and new media. In: Bruni L, Porta PL (Eds) Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 467–482

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilczek, B. (2018). Media use and life satisfaction: The moderating role of social events. International Review of Economics, 65,157-184.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Knack, S (2001). Trust, associational life and economic performance. In J. Helliwell & A. Bonikowska (Ed.). The contribution of human and social capital to sustained economic growth and well-being (pp.172-202). Ottawa and Paris: Human Resources Development and OECD.

  29. Sztompka, P. (1998). Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 1(1), 19-32

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bjornskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 22-40.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88-127

    Google Scholar 

  32. Uslaner, E.M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics.108.242-256.

  34. Yamaoka, K. (2008). Social capital and health and well-being in East Asia: A population-based study. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 885-899.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bartonlini, S., Bilancini, E., Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Soc Indic Res, 110, 1033-1059.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 664–683.

  37. Bugeja, M. (2004). Interpersonal divide: The search for community in a technological age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 420–435.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, S.J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14,509-531.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, W., & Chia, S. C. (2006). The effects of mass media use and social capital on civic and political participation. Communication Studies, 57, 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bensesch, C., Frey, B.S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). TV channels, self-control and happiness. B.E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2009). “Blogs, journalism and political participation” In Papacharissi, Z. (Eds.) Journalism and citizenship: New agendas in communication, (pp. 108–123). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40,575-586.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics, 9, 474-480.

  46. Uslaner, E.M. (1998). Social Capital, Television, and the “Mean World”: Trust, Optimism, and Civic Participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 441-467.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shah, D.V., McLeod, J.M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influence. Communication Research 28, 464-506.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jeffres, L.W., Lee, J.W., Neuendorf, K., & Atkin, D. (2003). Community and civic values, communication, and social capital: “Bowling Alone” as a product of value and communication. Paper presented at the Communication Theory & Methodology Division of the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass communication, Kansas City, MO.

  49. Dalton, R.J. & Kittilson, M. C. (2012). Virtual civil society in the United States and in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 11-29.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168

    Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson, J. &Martin, S. (2010). IT Use and declining social capital: More cold water from the General Social Survey (GSS) and the American Time-Use Survey (ATUS). Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 45-63.

  52. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pornsakulvanich, V., Haridakis, P., & Rubin, A.M. (2008). The influence of dispositions and Internet motivation on online communication satisfaction and relationship closeness. Computers in human behavior, 24(5), 2292-2310.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 506-528.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Frey, B.S., & Benesch, C. (2008). TV, time and happiness. Homo Oeconomicus, 25,413-424.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bratman, G.N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B.J., & Gross, J.J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303-322.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Etchell, P.J., Gage, S.H., Rutherford, A.D. & Munafo, M.R (2017). Prospective investigation of video game use in children and subsequent conduct disorder and depression using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. PloS One 11, e0147732.

  59. Twenge, J.M., Joiner, T.E., Roger, M.L., & Martin, G.N (2017). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media scree-time Clin. Psychol. Sci 6.3-17

    Google Scholar 

  60. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A.K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behavior, 3, 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Liu, J.Q., Xiong, M.L., Su, Y. (2013). National happiness at a Time of Economic Growth: A Tracking Study Based on CGSS Data. Social Sciences in China, 34(4), 20-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2013.849086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H.S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 60,137-155.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ferlander, S. (2007). The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Social. 50,115-128.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kim, S.H. (2007).Media use, social capital, and civic participation in South Korea. JQMC Quarterly, 84(3), 477-494.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  67. Kwak, N., Shah, D.V., & Hobert, R.L. (2004). Connecting, trusting and participating: The direct and interactive effects of social association. Political Research Quarterly, 57(4), 643-652.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3219825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Goldman, N., Cornman, J., & Chang, M. (2006).Measuring subjective social status: A case study of older Taiwanese. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 21(1-2), 71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kawachi, I., Kim, D., Coutts, A. Subramanian, S., 2004. Commentary: reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int, J. Epidemiol, 33(4), 682-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, and Computers, 36,717-731.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and American different? Journal of Public Economic, 88(9), 2009-2042.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chaffee, S.H., & Frank, S. (1996). How American get political information: Print versus broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 546, 48-58.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., & Kim, S. H. (2002). Who cares about local politics? Media influences on local political involvement, issue awareness, and attitude strength. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79,427-444.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Moy, P., McCluskey, M.R., McCoy, K., & Sprant, M.A. (2004). Political correlates of local news media use. Journal of Communication, 54,532-546.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2005). Income aspirations, television and happiness: Evidence from the World Values Survey. Kyklos, 59(2),209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00325.x.

  76. Ragheb, M., & Tate, R. (1993). A behavioral model of leisure participation, based on leisure attitude, motivation, and satisfaction. Leisure Studies, 1, 61-70.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Spiers, A., & Walker, G.J. (2009). The effects of ethnicity and leisure satisfaction on happiness peacefulness, and quality of life. Leisure Sciences, 31(1), 84-89.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wei, X., Huang, S., Stodolska, M., & Yu. Y. (2017). Leisure time, leisure activities, and happiness in China: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(5), 556–576. https://doi-org.wiulibraries.idm.oclc.org/10.18666/jlr-2015-v47-i5-6120

  79. Armpatzi, E., Burger, M.J., Novik, N. (2018). Social network sites, individual social capital and happiness. Journal Happiness Study, 19, 99-122.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Yip, W., Subramanian, S.V., Michell, A.D., Lee, D.T.S., Wang, J., & Kawachi, I. (2007). Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data analyzed in this study were gathered by the research project “China General Social Survey (CGSS)” sponsored by the China Social Science Foundation. This research project was carried out by the Department of Sociology, RENMIN University of China, and Social Science Division, Hong Kong Science and Technology University, and directed by Dr. Li Lulu and Dr. Bian Yanjie. The author appreciates the assistance in providing data by the institutes and individuals aforementioned.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanbin Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are the author’s own.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, F. Social Capital, Frequency of Media Exposure, and Subject Well-Being: Based on 2015 CGSS Data in China. East Asia 37, 281–299 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09344-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09344-9

Keywords

Navigation