Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mutating Multitudes, Collective Behavior, and Reinventing a Sociological Specialty

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a sociological specialty for investigating group phenomena, collective behavior set the benchmark at mid-twentieth century for the study of crowds and masses in social change. It had the status of a subfield that treated macro-level changes in terms of micro-level group interaction but later became eclipsed by theories of global transformation focused on culture and economy. Beset by the methodological conundrum of the individual in crowds, it was also challenged in postmodern debates on the problem of the self in decentered social environments. However, new research on networks has created space for the reinvention of collective behavior as a partner in inquiries on the meaning of digitized collectivity. It has also spurred new thinking on the significance of multitudes, swarms, and publics in networked collective behavior, as well as their implications for data gathering and control in systems of mass surveillance. Rather than becoming otiose, collective behavior looks set to take on new theoretical explorations in tandem with media researches on digitized masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, J. (2013). Constant touch: A global history of the mobile phone. Cambridge: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1985). The individualist dilemma in phenomenology and interactionism. In S. N. Eisenstadt & H. J. Helle (Eds.), Macro-sociological theory (pp. 25–27). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C., Giesen, B., Munch, R. & Smelser, N.J. (1987). The macro-micro link. Berkeley University of California Press.:

  • Allmer, T. (2012). Towards a critical theory of surveillance in informational capitalism. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Chase-Dunn, C. (2018). Globalization and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amenta, E., & Polletta, F. (2019). The cultural impacts of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive age. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C. (2015). ‘Crowded places are everywhere we go’: Crowds, emergency, politics. Theory Culture & Society, 32, 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, E. (2013). The Hitler swarm. Thesis Eleven, 117, 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S.A. (2011). The mediated crowd: New social media and new forms of rioting. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), article 21.

  • Barrows, S. (1981). Distorting mirrors: Visions of the crowd in late nineteenth century France. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983a). In the shadow of the silent majorities. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983b). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1985). The masses: Implosion of the social in the media. New Literary History, 16, 577–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1990). Fatal strategies. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (2005). The intelligence of evil or the lucidity pact. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 232–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (1974a). Collective behavior. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (1974b). A gaming approach to crowd behavior. American Sociological Review, 39, 355–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M., & Hamilton, M. (2010). Changing urban spaces: Mobile phones on trains. Mobilities, 5, 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., & Walkerdine, V. (2001). Mass hysteria: Critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1946). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), New outlines of the principles of sociology (pp. 167–221). New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators and coalitions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, C. (2013). Crowd theory and the management of crowds: A controversial relationship. Current Sociology, 61, 584–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, C., & Knudsen, B. T. (2013). Postmodern crowds: Re-inventing crowd thinking. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 14, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brissett, D. (1968). Collective behavior: The sense of a rubric. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. H. (1987). Society as text. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. H. (1992). Social science and society as discourse: Toward a sociology for civic competence. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 223–243). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Goldin, A. (1973). Collective behavior: A review and reinterpretation. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunz, M., & Meikle, D. G. (2018). The internet of things. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. (2004). Cellular phones, public fears, and a culture of precaution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canetti, E. (1973). Crowds and power. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2011). Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives. London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cislaru, G. (2015). Emotions in tweets: From instantaneity to preconstruction. Social Science Information, 54, 455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (2006). Deleuze: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 984–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1967). Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. (1968). Collective behavior: An examination of some stereotypes. Social Problems, 15, 310–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2017). Political acclamation, social media and the public mood. European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1977). The society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981). Writing and difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. (1984). Power and subjectivity in Foucault. New Left Review, 144, 72–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döveling, K., Harju, A. A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotions to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotions (pp. 1–11). Jan-Mar: Social Media & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2011). Contextualizing the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N., & Helle, H. J. (1985). Macrosociological theory. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. R. (1975). Readings in collective behavior. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fijnaut, C., & Marx, G. T. (1995). Undercover police surveillance in comparative perspective. The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality Vol.1. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, J. (2015). Smartphones as locative media. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (1989). On the microfoundations of macrosociology: A critique of microsociological reductionism. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuist, T. N., & Williams, R. H. (2019). Let’s call ourselves the super elite: Using the collective behavior tradition to analyze Trump’s America. Sociological Forum, 34(S1), 1035–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, F. L. (1977). Toward a revised of hysterical contagion. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 18, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, A. (2008). Panic! Affect contagion, mimesis and suggestion in the social field. Cultural Studies Review, 14, 130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critique in social theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2006). Cell phones: Mobile technology in everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K.D. & Ericson, R.V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 605–622.

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, A. (2015). The selfie assemblage. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1629–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P. (1979). Self and society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, L., Burgess, J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (2006). The cell phone: An anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtman, D., Aupers, S., & de Koster, W. (2016). Paradoxes of individualization: Social control and social conflict in contemporary modernity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: 20 years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. R. (1974). Collective behavior as a group-induced shift. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Levin, M. L., & Hamilton, H. (1963). Traditions of research on the diffusion of innovation. American Sociological Review, 28, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, A. C. (1970). A theory of hysterical contagion. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior (pp. 81–93). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, A. C., & Back, K. W. (1968). The June bug: A study of hysterical contagion. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killian, L. M. (1980). Theory of collective behavior: The mainstream revisited. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Sociological theory and research: A critical appraisal (pp. 275–289). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, O. E. (1972). Currents of unrest: An introduction to collective behavior. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1961). Collective dynamics. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K. & Lang, G.E. (1970). Collective behavior theory and the escalated riots of the sixties. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior (pp.94–110). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (1960). The crowd. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. E. (1986). Mastering the crowd: Collective behavior and mass society in American social thought 1917–1939. American Studies, 27, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. L. M. (1990). The micro-macro problem in collective behavior: Reconciling agency and structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.L.M. (1997). The reversible imaginary: Baudrillard and the end of the social. In J.D Greenwood (Ed.), The mark of the social: Discovery or invention? (pp.253–271). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield..

  • Lee, R. L. M. (2016a). Smart swarms: Some observations on contagion and cohesion in cell-phone society. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 17, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. L. M. (2016b). Diagnosing the selfie: pathology or parody? Networking the spectacle in late capitalism. Third Text, 30, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. L. M. (2017). Do online crowds really exist? Proximity, connectivity and collectivity. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 18, 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistert, O. (2017). Mobile phone signals and protest crowds: Performing an unstable post- media constellation. In M. Leeker, I. Schipper, & T. Beyes (Eds.), Performing the digital (pp. 137–154). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, C. (1992). General social theory, irony, postmodernism. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 17–46). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell-phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1982). Crowd joys. Urban Life, 10, 355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvlie, L. (1992). Postmodernism and subjectivity. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology andpostmodernism (pp. 119–134). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (2009). Identifying citizens: ID cards as surveillance. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (2010). Liquid surveillance: The contributions of Zygmunt Bauman to surveillance studies. International Political Sociology, 4, 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique (pp. 1–13). July-Dec: Big Data & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T. (2012). Looking at Smelser’s theory of collective behavior after almost 50 years: A review and appreciation. The American Sociologist, 43, 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: Surveillance and society in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T., & McAdam, D. (1994). Collective behavior and social movements: Process and structure. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T., & Wood, J. L. (1975). Strands of theory and research in collective behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 363–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarella, W. (2010). The myth of the multitude, or, who’s afraid of the crowd? Critical Inquiry, 36, 697–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland D.A., Lewis, K. & Goldberg, A. (2016). Sociology in the era of big data: The ascent of forensic social science. The American Sociologist, 47, 12–35.

  • McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C., & Miller, D. (1973). The assembling process: A theoretical and empirical examination. American Sociological Review, 38, 721–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1983). Individual and collective behaviors within gatherings, demonstrations, and riots. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 579–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C. & Wohlstein, R.T. (1986). Collective locomotion as collective behavior. American Sociological Review, 51, 447–463.

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2010). Surveillance in a time of insecurity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1985). The age of the crowd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. C. (2015). Notes to self: The visual culture of selfie in the age of social media. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18, 490–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., Moran, J., & Armstrong, G. (1998). Surveillance, closed circuit televisions and social control. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, R. A. (1975). The origins of crowd psychology: Gustave Le Bon and the crisis of mass democracy in the third republic. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Harrow, R. (2006). No place to hide. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. E. (1993). Formal theories of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S. (1989). Analysis of events in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, J. (2008). Politics of swarms: Translations between entomology and biopolitics. Parallax, 14, 112–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1972). The crowd and the public and other essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (2000). Total surveillance. London: Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, S. (1992). The most radical gesture: The Situationist International in a postmodern age. London: Routledge.

  • Polletta, F., & Jaspers, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protevi, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L., & Weller, J. M. (1974). The structural problem of a sociological specialty: Collective behavior’s lack of a critical mass. The American Sociologist, 9, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambukkana, N. (2015). Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., Stott, C., Cronin, P., & Adang, O. (2004). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing, 27, 558–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettie, R. (2008). Mobile phones as network capital: Facilitating connections. Mobilities, 3, 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettie, R. (2009). Mobile phone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology, 43, 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community. London: Secker & Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. D. (1982). Outbreaks: The sociology of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1967). The social contract. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality: Contagion theory in the age of networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, T. D., Maddison, S., & Ellis, D. (2018). Affect and social media: Emotions, mediation, anxiety and contagion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, M. (2014). The coming swarm: Ddos actions, hacktivism, and civil disobedience on the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnapp, J.T. & Tiews, M. (2006). Introduction: A book of crowds. In J.T. Schnapp & M. Tiews (Eds.), Crowds (pp. i-xvi). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Seidler, J., Meyer, K., & MacGillivray, L. (1976). Collecting data on crowds and rallies: A new method of stationary sampling. Social Forces, 55, 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1994). Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, T. M., & Baym, N. K. (2015). What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1588–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultziner, D., & Goldberg, S. (2019). The stages of mass mobilization: Separate phenomena and distinct causal mechanisms. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49, 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sighele, S. (1901). La foule criminelle. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N.J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press (reissued 2011, New Orleans: QuidPro Books).

  • Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1901). L’opinion et al foule. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, E. (2004a). Networks, swarms, multitudes. CTheory, Article 142a.

  • Thacker, E. (2004b). Networks, swarms, multitudes. CTheory, Article 142b.

  • Turner, R. H. (1964). Collective behavior. In R. Faris (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 382–425). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1972). Collective behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, B. (1998). Breakdown theories of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ginnekan, J. (1992). Crowds, psychology, and politics 1871–1899. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehlken, S. (2013). Zootechnologies: Swarming as a cultural technique. Theory, Culture & Society, 30, 110–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G. (2009). Political sociology and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1999). The crowd in the age of Diana: Ordinary inventiveness and the popular imagination. In A. Kear & D. L. Steinberg (Eds.), Mourning Diana: Nation, culture and the performance of grief (pp. 98–107). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, R., & Lo, V. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8, 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. (1966). Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychological Review, 73, 179,192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, C. (2014). Between swarm, network, and multitude: Anonymous and the infrastructure of the common. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 15, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, N. (1988). The micro-macro problem in social theory. Sociological Theory, 6, 254–261.

  • Wright, S. (1978). Crowds and riots: A study in social organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anthropology & Sociology University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Raymond L.M. Lee

Authors
  1. Raymond L.M. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond L.M. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, R.L. Mutating Multitudes, Collective Behavior, and Reinventing a Sociological Specialty. Am Soc 51, 425–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09450-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09450-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation