Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chemotherapy management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II study comparing two popular chemotherapy regimens

  • Brief Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective, phase II clinical study is to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine and cisplatin in comparison to pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Patients and methods

The patients were recruited from May 2008 to May 2011. One group included 21 cases who received cisplatin and gemcitabine. The other group included 19 cases who received pemetrexed and carboplatin.

Results

Response is superior in the pemetrexed group (p = 0.041). The median follow-up was 18 months (range 6–30 months). Cumulative survival at 1.5 years was 57.8 % for the pemetrexed carboplatin group. For the gemcitabine cisplatin group, the cumulative survival proportion at 1.5 years was 41 % (p = 0.0599).

Conclusions

Pemetrexed plus carboplatin are a step forward in the treatment of mesothelioma, the prognosis for these patients remains poor. Cheaper combinations as gemcitabine and cisplatin may be considered sufficient to treat cases with advanced mesothelioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Wojtukiewicz MZ, Zacharski LR, Memoli VA et al (1989) Absence of components of coagulation and fibrinolysis pathways in situ in mesothelioma. Thromb Res 55:279–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R et al (2004) Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 128:138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldini EH (2004) External beam radiation therapy for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma. Thorac Surg Clin 14:543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson BW, Lake RA (2005) Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med 353:1591–1603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Lalami Y et al (2002) Activity of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 38:111–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raghavan D, Gianoutsos P, Bishop J et al (1990) Phase II trial of carboplatin in the management of malignant mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 8:151–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vogelzang NJ, Goutsou M, Corson JM et al (1990) Carboplatin in malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study of the Cancer and Leukaemia Group B. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27:239–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazarika M, White RM, Booth BP et al (2005) Pemetrexed in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res 11:982–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21:2636–2644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ong ST, Vogelzang NJ (1996) Chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a review. J Clin Oncol 14:1007–1017

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zidar BL, Green S, Pierce HI et al (1988) A phase II evaluation of cisplatin in unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma: a southwest oncology group study. Invest New Drugs 6:223–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Millard FE, Herndon J, Vogelzang MR et al (1997) Gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study of the cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB 9530). ProcAm Soc Clin Oncol 16:1710

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bischoff HG, Manegold C, Knopp M et al (1998) Gemcitabine (Gemzar) may reduce tumor load and tumor associated symptoms in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:1784

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rusch VW (1995) A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma: from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Chest 108:1122–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. National Cancer Institute: Common Toxicity Criteria Manual, NCI-CTC version 2.0, April 30, 1999. http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html

  16. Rusch VW (2003) Pemetrexed and cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a new standard of care? J Clin Oncol 21:2629–2630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes A, Calvert P, Azzabi A et al (2002) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 20:3533–3544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceresoli GL, Zucali PA, Favaretto AG, Grossi F, Bidoli P, Del Conte G, Ceribelli A, Bearz A, Morenghi E, Cavina R, Marangolo M, Parra HJ, Santoro A (2006) Phase II study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 24:1443–1448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Byrne MJ, Nowak AK (2004) Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol 15:257–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fennell D, Steele J, Sheaff M et al (2005) Response of malignant pleural mesothelioma to chemotherapy does not confer a survival advantage. Lung Cancer 49:S220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Habib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habib, E.E., Fahmy, E.S. Chemotherapy management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II study comparing two popular chemotherapy regimens. Clin Transl Oncol 15, 965–968 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-013-1015-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-013-1015-3

Keywords

Navigation