Abstract
Recent clinical studies have reported not only changes in bone mineral density in patient populations but also changes in bone strength determined using finite element modeling. Finite element modeling is a technique well established in engineering but unfamiliar to many clinicians and basic biologists. Here, we provide a conceptual introduction to finite element modeling and its clinical applications to bone that is written for individuals without any background in engineering. Finite element modeling of bone is the net result of over 60 years of effort in the engineering community and over 40 years of effort in the field of bone biomechanics. We discuss the mathematical and theoretical basis for finite element modeling, how finite element models are created from clinical images and the assumptions made in using finite element models to estimate whole bone strength. In addition, we discuss the limitations of finite element modeling in patient populations with altered bone tissue quality. Clinical studies have shown that prediction of fracture risk using finite element modeling is as effective, and in some cases superior, to simple measures of bone mineral density. Further application of finite element modeling to clinical studies has the potential to improve fracture risk assessment beyond what is currently possible with bone mineral density.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its applications to screening of postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:368–81.
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E. FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone. 2009;44:734–43.
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey EV. Fracture risk assessment: the development and application of FRAX. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Dempster DW, Luckey M, Cauley JA, editors. Osteoporosis. 4th ed. Waltham: Academic Press; 2013. p. 1611–40.
Keaveny TM. Biomechanical computed tomography-noninvasive bone strength analysis using clinical computed tomography scans. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1192:57–65.
Lang TF, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Chengshi J, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Gudnason V, Keyak JH. Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the age gene/environment susceptibility study-Reykjavik. Bone. 2012;50:743–8.
Zysset PK, Dall’ara E, Varga P, Pahr DH. Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength. Bonekey Rep. 2013;2:386.
Thomee V. From finite differences to finite elements—a short history of numerical analysis of partial differential equations. J Comput Appl Math. 2001;128:1–54.
Lenaerts L, van Lenthe GH. Multi-level patient-specific modelling of the proximal femur. A promising tool to quantify the effect of osteoporosis treatment. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009;367:2079–93.
Zysset P, Qin L, Lang T, Khosla S, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT, Engelke K. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the hip and spine in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2015 ISCD official positions-part II. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18:359–92.
Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Muller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1468–86.
Keyak JH, Lee IY, Skinner HB. Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:1329–36.
Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2003;33:744–50.
Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech. 1998;31:125–33.
Jackman TM, DelMonaco AM, Morgan EF. Accuracy of finite element analyses of CT scans in predictions of vertebral failure patterns under axial compression and anterior flexion. J Biomech. 2016;49:267–75.
Pentecost RL, Murray RA, Brindley HH. Fatigue, insufficiency, and pathologic fractures. JAMA. 1964;187:1001–4.
Ettinger B, Burr DB, Ritchie RO. Proposed pathogenesis for atypical femoral fractures: lessons from material research. Bone. 2013;55:495–500.
Hernandez CJ, Keaveny TM. A biomechanical perspective on bone quality. Bone. 2006;39:1173–81.
Van Staa TP, Laan RF, Barton IP, Cohen S, Reid DM, Cooper C. Bone density threshold and other predictors of vertebral fracture in patients receiving oral glucocorticoid therapy. Arthr Rheum. 2003;48:3224–9.
Premaor M, Compston J. Obesity, diabetes and fractures. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Dempster DW, Luckey M, Cauley JA, editors. Osteoporosis. 4th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2013. p. 1331–48.
Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir GS, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Gudnason V, Lang TF. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study. Bone. 2013;57:18–29.
Keaveny TM, McClung MR, Genant HK, Zanchetta JR, Kendler D, Brown JP, Goemaere S, Recknor C, Brandi ML, Eastell R, Kopperdahl DL, Engelke K, Fuerst T, Radcliffe HS, Libanati C. Femoral and vertebral strength improvements in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:158–65.
Kopperdahl DL, Aspelund T, Hoffmann PF, Sigurdsson S, Siggeirsdottir K, Harris TB, Gudnason V, Keaveny TM. Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:570–80.
Zysset P, Pahr D, Engelke K, Genant HK, McClung MR, Kendler DL, Recknor C, Kinzl M, Schwiedrzik J, Museyko O, Wang A, Libanati C. Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology. Bone. 2015;81:122–30.
Keyak JH, Koyama AK, LeBlanc A, Lu Y, Lang TF. Reduction in proximal femoral strength due to long-duration spaceflight. Bone. 2009;44:449–53.
Acknowledgments
This publication was supported in part by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (USA) under Award Number AR057362 and NSF grant number 1068560 and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant Number DGE-1144153. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Christopher J. Hernandez and Erin N. Cresswell have no potential conflict of interest.
Animal and Human Studies
This article does not include any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hernandez, C.J., Cresswell, E.N. Understanding Bone Strength from Finite Element Models: Concepts for Non-engineers. Clinic Rev Bone Miner Metab 14, 161–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-016-9218-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-016-9218-0