Abstract
The enzymatic hydrolysis of the native and the pretreated palm pressed fiber (PPF) was deeply investigated by using the enzyme cocktail ACCELLERASE 1500. Together with the spent PPF from the first hydrolysis and the further doubly-treated PPF, the proportions of three main components were determined and analyzed based on a triangle figure. The proportion (cellulose/hemicelluloses/lignin) in the spent PPF was equal to 44:23:33 and the surface morphology of the spent PPF looks very similar to the native PPF surface showing poor hydrolysis efficiency. After further double treatment, the proportion was changed evidently from the original 44:23:33 to 54:21:25 and the surface structure was significantly disrupted showing a potential to be hydrolyzed completely. Additionally, all samples were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffractogram through considerations of alkaline solution treatment, so as to understand better the nature of biomass hydrolysis, from the aspect of three biomass components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource Technology, 101(13), 4851–4861.
Blasi, C. D., Signorelli, G., Russo, C. D., & Rea, G. (1999). Product distribution from pyrolysis of wood and agricultural residues. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(6), 2216–2224.
Cao, W. X., Sun, C., Liu, R. H., Yin, R. Z., & Wu, X. W. (2012). Comparison of the effects of five pretreatment methods on enhancing the enzymatic digestibility and ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse. Bioresource Technology, 111, 215–221.
Chang, V. S., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2000). Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84, 5–37.
Desai, S. G., & Converse, A. O. (1997). Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 56, 650–655.
Eremeeva, T., Bikova, T., Eisimonte, M., Viesturs, U., & Treimanis, A. (2001). Fractionation and molecular characteristics of cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose, 8, 69–79.
He, Y. F., Pang, Y. Z., Liu, Y. P., Li, X. J., & Wang, K. S. (2008). Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production. Energy & Fuels, 22, 2775–2781.
Hong, J., Ye, X., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2007). Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a non-hydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir, 23, 12535–12540.
Ibrahima, M. M., El-Zawawya, W. K., Abdel-Fattahb, Y. R., Solimanb, N. A., & Agblevor, F. A. (2011). Comparison of alkaline pulping with steam explosion for glucose production from rice straw. Carbohydrate Polymers, 83, 720–726.
Kumar, R., Mago, G., Balan, V., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology, 100(17), 3948–3962.
Kumar, R., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology? Bioresource Technology, 100, 4193–4202.
Laureano-Perez, L., Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., & Dale, B. E. (2005). Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 124, 1081–1099.
Lee, Y. H., & Fan, L. T. (1983). Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II) Analysis of Extended Hydrolysis Times. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25, 939–966.
Lin, L., Yan, R., Liu, Y., & Jiang, W. (2010). In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Bioresource Technology, 101(21), 8217–8223.
Ma, A., Hu, Q., Qu, Y., Bai, Z., Liu, W., & Zhuang, G. (2008). The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 42, 543–547.
Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428.
Mittal, A., Katahira, R., Himmel, M. E., & Johnson, D. K. (2011). Effects of alkaline or liquid-ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 4, 41.
Pandey, K. K., & Pitman, A. J. (2003). FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 52(3), 151–160.
Riansa-ngawong, W., & Prasertsan, P. (2011). Optimization of furfural production from hemicellulose extracted from delignified palm pressed fiber using a two-stage process. Carbohydrate Research, 346, 103–110.
Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, J. A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959). An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal, 29(10), 786–794.
Selig, M. J., Vinzant, T. B., Himmel, M. E., & Decker, S. R. (2009). The effect of lignin removal by alkaline peroxide pretreatment on the susceptibility of corn stover to purified cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 155(1–3), 397–406.
Soto, M. L., Domínguez, H., Núñez, M. J., & Lema, J. M. (1994). Enzymatic saccharification of alkali-treated sunflower hulls. Bioresource Technology, 49(1), 53–59.
Valjamae, P., Sild, V., Pettersson, G., & Johansson, G. (1999). Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. European Journal of Biochemistry, 266, 327–334.
Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Gao, P., Shi, D., Liu, H., & Gao, H. (2006). Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 443–456.
Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. A., & Deng, Y. (2008). Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydrate Polymers, 72, 178–184.
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., Liang, D. T., & Zheng, C. (2006). Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases. Fuel Processing Technology, 87, 935–942.
Zhang, Q. Z., & Cai, W. M. (2008). Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(12), 1130–1135. 357.
Zhang, Y. L. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004). Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated rice straw by Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88, 797–824.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology support program (2013SZ0090), and are grateful for Genencor International Incorporation for gifting the enzyme preparation ACCELLERASE 1500.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, L., Yan, R., Jiang, W. et al. Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Palm Pressed Fiber Based on the Three Main Components: Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Lignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173, 409–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0848-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0848-8