Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Palm Pressed Fiber Based on the Three Main Components: Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Lignin

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enzymatic hydrolysis of the native and the pretreated palm pressed fiber (PPF) was deeply investigated by using the enzyme cocktail ACCELLERASE 1500. Together with the spent PPF from the first hydrolysis and the further doubly-treated PPF, the proportions of three main components were determined and analyzed based on a triangle figure. The proportion (cellulose/hemicelluloses/lignin) in the spent PPF was equal to 44:23:33 and the surface morphology of the spent PPF looks very similar to the native PPF surface showing poor hydrolysis efficiency. After further double treatment, the proportion was changed evidently from the original 44:23:33 to 54:21:25 and the surface structure was significantly disrupted showing a potential to be hydrolyzed completely. Additionally, all samples were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffractogram through considerations of alkaline solution treatment, so as to understand better the nature of biomass hydrolysis, from the aspect of three biomass components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource Technology, 101(13), 4851–4861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blasi, C. D., Signorelli, G., Russo, C. D., & Rea, G. (1999). Product distribution from pyrolysis of wood and agricultural residues. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(6), 2216–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, W. X., Sun, C., Liu, R. H., Yin, R. Z., & Wu, X. W. (2012). Comparison of the effects of five pretreatment methods on enhancing the enzymatic digestibility and ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse. Bioresource Technology, 111, 215–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, V. S., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2000). Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Desai, S. G., & Converse, A. O. (1997). Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 56, 650–655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eremeeva, T., Bikova, T., Eisimonte, M., Viesturs, U., & Treimanis, A. (2001). Fractionation and molecular characteristics of cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose, 8, 69–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. He, Y. F., Pang, Y. Z., Liu, Y. P., Li, X. J., & Wang, K. S. (2008). Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production. Energy & Fuels, 22, 2775–2781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, J., Ye, X., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2007). Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a non-hydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir, 23, 12535–12540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahima, M. M., El-Zawawya, W. K., Abdel-Fattahb, Y. R., Solimanb, N. A., & Agblevor, F. A. (2011). Comparison of alkaline pulping with steam explosion for glucose production from rice straw. Carbohydrate Polymers, 83, 720–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, R., Mago, G., Balan, V., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology, 100(17), 3948–3962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, R., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology? Bioresource Technology, 100, 4193–4202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laureano-Perez, L., Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., & Dale, B. E. (2005). Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 124, 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, Y. H., & Fan, L. T. (1983). Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II) Analysis of Extended Hydrolysis Times. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25, 939–966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, L., Yan, R., Liu, Y., & Jiang, W. (2010). In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Bioresource Technology, 101(21), 8217–8223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, A., Hu, Q., Qu, Y., Bai, Z., Liu, W., & Zhuang, G. (2008). The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 42, 543–547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mittal, A., Katahira, R., Himmel, M. E., & Johnson, D. K. (2011). Effects of alkaline or liquid-ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 4, 41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandey, K. K., & Pitman, A. J. (2003). FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 52(3), 151–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Riansa-ngawong, W., & Prasertsan, P. (2011). Optimization of furfural production from hemicellulose extracted from delignified palm pressed fiber using a two-stage process. Carbohydrate Research, 346, 103–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, J. A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959). An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal, 29(10), 786–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Selig, M. J., Vinzant, T. B., Himmel, M. E., & Decker, S. R. (2009). The effect of lignin removal by alkaline peroxide pretreatment on the susceptibility of corn stover to purified cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 155(1–3), 397–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Soto, M. L., Domínguez, H., Núñez, M. J., & Lema, J. M. (1994). Enzymatic saccharification of alkali-treated sunflower hulls. Bioresource Technology, 49(1), 53–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Valjamae, P., Sild, V., Pettersson, G., & Johansson, G. (1999). Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. European Journal of Biochemistry, 266, 327–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Gao, P., Shi, D., Liu, H., & Gao, H. (2006). Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 443–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. A., & Deng, Y. (2008). Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydrate Polymers, 72, 178–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., Liang, D. T., & Zheng, C. (2006). Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases. Fuel Processing Technology, 87, 935–942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Q. Z., & Cai, W. M. (2008). Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(12), 1130–1135. 357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Y. L. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004). Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated rice straw by Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88, 797–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology support program (2013SZ0090), and are grateful for Genencor International Incorporation for gifting the enzyme preparation ACCELLERASE 1500.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, L., Yan, R., Jiang, W. et al. Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Palm Pressed Fiber Based on the Three Main Components: Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Lignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173, 409–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0848-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0848-8

Keywords

Navigation