Skip to main content
Log in

Glücksforschung: Eine empirische Analyse

Happiness economics: an empirical analysis

  • Originalveröffentlichung
  • Published:
AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Glücksrevolution in der Ökonomik und in anderen Sozialwissenschaften steht erst am Anfang. Das subjektive Wohlbefinden, häufig als Glück bezeichnet, direkt zu erfassen, bringt neue Einsichten und eröffnet der wissenschaftlichen Forschung ertragreiche und bisher unbeschrittene Wege. Gewöhnungsprozesse und Vergleiche mit anderen Menschen sind wesentliche Bestimmungsgründe des subjektiven Wohlbefindens.

Der Lebenszufriedenheitsansatz eignet sich als neue Methode zur Bewertung öffentlicher Güter und Ungüter, wie anhand des Terrorismus gezeigt wird.

Die Vorstellung, die Regierung solle das gemessene Glück der Menschen maximieren, wird verworfen; vielmehr ist eine vergleichende institutionelle Analyse des subjektiven Wohlbefindens notwendig.

Abstract

In economics there is presently an almost revolutionary development. The direct measurement of subjective welfare challenges traditional economics, inspires it, and opens new avenues for scientific research. The approaches and possibilities of an economic analysis of happiness are shown and illustrated with two specific applications. The relationship between income and life satisfaction is strongly shaped by the aspiration level serving to evaluate life conditions. The aspiration levels are formed by social comparisons and adaptation processes. The Life Satisfaction Approach is a new method to capture the value of public goods. The short discussion of governmental “happiness policy” from a constitutional viewpoint suggests a comparative institutional analysis of subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Notes

  1. Der Literatur folgend wird, solange kein Missverständnis entsteht, zum einfacheren Verständnis häufig der Begriff „Glück“ anstelle von „Lebenszufriedenheit“ verwendet.

  2. Siehe http://www.misuredelbenessere.it, abgerufen am 4.9.2012.

  3. Siehe http://www.ciw.ca/en/, abgerufen am 4.9.2012.

  4. Siehe http://www.green.maryland.gov/mdgpi/whatisthegpi.asp, abgerufen am 4.9.2012.

Literatur

  • Becker GS (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2008) Hypertension and happiness across nations. J Health Econ 27(2):218–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1954) Social choice, democracy, and free markets. J Polit Econ 62(4):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Rabin M (Hrsg) (2003) Advances in behavioral economics. Russell Sage Foundation Press/Princeton University Press, New York/Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Frijters P, Shields M (2008) Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J Econ Lit 46(1):95–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destatis (2011). Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen. Bruttoinlandsprodukt, Bruttonationaleinkommen, Volkseinkommen. Lange Reihen ab 1950. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wiesbaden

  • Diener E (2005) Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Mimeo. University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign

  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125(2):276–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (2001) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Econ J (Lond) 111(473):465–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonel A, Frijters P (2004) The effect of metholodogy on the determinants of happiness. Econ J (Lond) 114:641–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM III (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. RFF Press, Washington Resources for the Future

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (1990) Ökonomie ist Sozialwissenschaft. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (2001) Inspiring economics: human motivation in political economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (2008) Happiness: a revolution in economics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (2011) Subjective well-being, politics and political economy. Schweiz Z Volkswirtsch Stat 147(4):397–415

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Frey Marti C (2011) Glück. Die Sicht der Ökonomie. 2 Aufl. Rüegger Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002a) Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton University Press, Princeton und Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002b) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40(2):402–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (Hrsg) (2007) Economics and psychology. A promising new cross-disciplinary field. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2010) Glück: Die ökonomische Analyse. In: Witte EH, Gollan T (Hrsg). Sozialpsychologie und Ökonomie. Pabst Science Publisher, Lengerich, S 75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Lüchinger S, Stutzer A (2009) The life satisfaction approach to valuing public goods: the case of terrorism. Public Choice 138(3–4):317–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D (2006) Stumbling on happiness. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 20(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Diener, Schwarz N (Hrsg) (1999) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Wakker PP, Sarin R (1997) Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 112(2):375–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane RE (2000) The loss of happiness in market economies. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüchinger S (2009) Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. Econ J (Lond) 119(536): 482–515

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon DM (2006) Happiness: a history. Atlantic Monthly Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (2003) Public choice III. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Compendium of OECD well-being indicators. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag BMS, van, Baarsma BE (2004) Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: the case of airport noise. Econ J (Lond) 115(500):224–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52:141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler JW, Dan A, Loewenstein G (2003) The pursuit and assessment of happiness can be self-defeating. In: Brocas I, Carrillo JD (Hrsg) The psychology of economic decisions, Bd 1. Rationality and well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 41–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Shene F, Loewenstein G (1999) Hedonic adaptation. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (Hrsg) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, S. 302–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer A (2004) The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J Econ Behav Organ 54(1):89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer A, Frey BS (2006) Does marriage make happy, or do happy people get married? J Socio-Econ 35:326–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer A, Frey BS (2010a) Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Soc Sci Res 77:679–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer A, Frey BS (2010b) Ökonomische Analyse des Glücks: Inspirationen und Herausforderungen. In: Holenstein A et al. (Hrsg.) Glück. Berner Universitätszeitschriften, Bern, pp 228–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R (1992) The winner’s curse: paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. Free Press

  • Theil H (1964) Optimal decisions for government and industry. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1956) Economic policy: principles and design. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (1993) Happiness in nations: subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations, 1946–1992. Erasmus University Press, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GG, Frick JR, Schupp J (2007) The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)—scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127:139–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno S. Frey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frey, B.S., Steiner, L. Glücksforschung: Eine empirische Analyse. AStA Wirtsch Sozialstat Arch 6, 9–25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-012-0119-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-012-0119-5

Schlüsselwörter

JEL Klassifikationen

Keywords

Navigation