Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Are Multichannel Urodynamics Required Prior to Surgery in a Woman with Stress Urinary Incontinence?

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence recommends that cystometry need not be performed before conservative therapy for incontinence in women, nor is cystometry routinely recommended in the small group of women with a clearly defined diagnosis of pure stress incontinence. Nonetheless, it is frequently utilized in the assessment of women with stress urinary incontinence in the hope that results will shed light on preoperative risk factors for failure or postoperative voiding dysfunction. The ability of urodynamic studies to characterize these parameters reliably remains under investigation. Because urodynamic studies are invasive, costly, and not always available, it is imperative that its benefit be carefully explored. This review highlights the recent arguments for and against this recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Takacs EB, Zimmern PE: Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2006, 3:544–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song PH, Kim YD, Kim HT, et al.: The 7-year outcome of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treating female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2009, 104:1113–1117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, et al.: Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 1993, 150:1452–1454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan TO Jr, Westney OL, McGuire EJ: Pubovaginal sling: 4-year outcome analysis and quality of life assessment. J Urol 2000, 163:1845–1848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaikin DC, Rosenthal J, Blaivas JG: Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol 1998, 160:1312–1316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Houwert RM, Roovers JP, Venema PL, et al.: When to perform urodynamics before mid-urethral sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010, 21:303–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber AM, Taylor RJ, Wei JT, et al.: The cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 2002, 89:356–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duggan PM, Wilson PD, Norton P, et al.: Utilization of preoperative urodynamic investigations by gynecologists who frequently operate for female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:282–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber AM: Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001, 56:720–735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nygaard I: Physiologic outcome measures for urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004, 126(1 Suppl 1):S99–S105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heesakkers JP, Vriesema JL: The role of urodynamics in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Curr Opin Urol 2005, 15:215–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemack GE: Urodynamic assessment of patients with stress incontinence: how effective are urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressures at case selection and predicting outcome? Curr Opin Urol 2004, 14:307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu TH, Rackley RR, Appell RA: The supine stress test: a simple method to detect intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction. J Urol 1999, 162:460–463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowara A, Witek A, Prajsner A, Graniczka M: Leaking index: a new urodynamic parameter in the diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence [in Polish]. Ginekol Pol 2009, 80:894–899.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. • Nager CW, Kraus SR, Kenton K, et al.: Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn 2010 Feb 1 (Epub ahead of print). These data suggest that UDS measures of urethral function are not related to subjective or objective measures of urinary incontinence severity.

  16. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA: Proposed management of low urethral pressure type of genuine stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1989, 27:155–159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koonings PP, Bergman A, Ballard CA: Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for filed retropubic surgical procedure. Urology 1990, 36:245–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Quadri G, Magatti F, Belloni C, et al.: Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy and Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women with low pressure and hypermobility of the urethra: early results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 181:12–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wadie BS, El-Hefnawy AS: Urethral pressure measurement in stress incontinence: does it help? Int Urol Nephrol 2009, 41:491–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, et al.: Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 201:202.e1–e.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilicarslan H, Gokce G, Ayan S, et al.: Predictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:339–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan SA, Te AE, Young GP, et al.: Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience. J Urol 2000, 164:1623–1627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodríguez LV, de Almeida F, Dorey F, Raz S: Does Valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal urethral polypropylene sling? Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol 2004, 172:210–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nager CW, FitzGerald M, Kraus SR, et al.: Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women. J Urol 2008, 179:1470–1474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung HJ, Yim GW, Jeon MJ, et al.: Preoperative maximum urethral closure pressure and valsalva leak point pressure as predictive parameters for midurethral sling. J Reprod Med 2009, 54:436–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL, et al.: Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2003, 169:2234–2237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang AC, Chen MC: The correlation between preoperative voiding mechanism and surgical outcome of the tension free vaginal tape procedure, with reference to quality of life. BJU Int 2003, 91:502–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA, et al.: Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2009, 28:82–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, et al.: Predictive value of urodynamics on outcome after midurethral sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 200:649.e1–e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Digesu GA, Hendricken C, Fernando R, Khullar V: Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics? Urology 2009, 74:278–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffiths D, Kondo A, Bauer S, et al.: Dynamic testing. In Incontinence Volume I: Basics and Evaluation. Edited by Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khouri S, et al. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd; 2005:587–674.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Renganathan A, Duckett J, Nayak K: Female urinary incontinence–urodynamics: yes or no? J Obstet Gynaecol 2009, 29:473–479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. •• Nager CW, Brubaker L, Daneshgari F, et al.: Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials 2009, 30:531–539. The primary aim of this noninferiority randomized clinical trial is to determine whether women with symptomatic uncomplicated SUI who undergo only a basic office evaluation prior to SUI surgery (no UDS arm) have noninferior treatment outcomes compared to women who have BOE and UDS (UDS arm).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. •• Van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al.: Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered. BMC Womens Health 2009, 21:9–22. The VUSIS study evaluates the positive and negative effects with regard to outcome, as well as the costs of UDS, in women with symptoms of SUI in whom surgical treatment is considered.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Arthur Mourtzinos is a consultant for Ethicon Women’s Health and Urology and Coloplast, has previously served as a consultant for American Medical Systems, and has received research funding from Allergan and Coloplast.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tufts School of Medicine, Institute of Urology, Continence Center, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA

    Arthur Mourtzinos

Authors
  1. Arthur Mourtzinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Mourtzinos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mourtzinos, A. Are Multichannel Urodynamics Required Prior to Surgery in a Woman with Stress Urinary Incontinence?. Curr Urol Rep 11, 323–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0127-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0127-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation