Abstract
A decade ago, bladder neck slings were recognized as the gold standard technique for a majority of patients. Today, tension-free vaginal tape is widely accepted as the standard approach for index surgery in female stress urinary incontinence. Recently published articles have demonstrated a decrease in the use of bladder neck slings and a significant increase in the use of mid urethral synthetic slings. Currently, bladder neck sling procedures appear to confer a cure rate similar to open retropubic colposuspension and mid urethral sling procedures, but the long-term adverse event profiles are still unclear. Although, bladder neck slings remain in the armamentarium of pelvic surgeons, they are reserved mainly for pediatric patients and for complex patients at high risk for urethral damage, with recurrent urinary incontinence and with low-pressure urethras, as well as for the patients who may refuse having synthetic slings. This article reviews the role of bladder neck slings in the era of the midurethral slings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Blaivas J, Chaikin D. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of all types of stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and long-term outcome. Urol Clin NA. 2001;38:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2010.12.002.
Goebel R. Zur operativen besteitigung der anger- borenen incontinenz vesicae. Zeitscher Gynakol. 1910;2:187–91.
Aldridge AH. Transplantation of fascia for relief of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1942;44:398.
Low JA. Management of severe anatomic deficiencies of urethral sphincteric function by a combined procedure with a fascia lata sling. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1969;105:149.
Sloan WR, Banvin BN. Stress incontinence of urine: a retrospective study of the complications and late results of simple suprapubic suburethral fascial slings. J Urol. 1973;110:533.
Blaivas JG, Jacobs BZ. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1991;145:1214.
Hohenfellner R, Petri E. Sling procedures. In: Stanton SL, Tanagho EA, editors. Surgery of female incontinence. New York: Springer; 1980. p. 69–76.
Woodside JR, Borden TA. Pubovaginal sling procedure for the management of urinary incontinence in a myelodysplastic girl. J Urol. 1982;127:744.
McGuire EJ, Wang C-C, Usitalo H, Savastano J. Modified pubovaginal sling in girls with myelodysplasia. J Urol. 1986;135:94.
Raz S, McGuire EJ, Ehrlich RM, Zeidman EJ, Wang SC, Alarcon A, Schmidtbauer C, McLaughlin S. Fascia1 sling to correct male neurogenic sphincter incompetence: the McGuireRaz approach. J Urol. 1988;139:528.
Herschorn S, Radomski SB. Fascia1 slings and bladder neck tapering in the treatment of male neurogenic incontinence. J Urol. 1992;147:1073.
•• Rehman H, Bezerra CC, Bruschini H, Cody JD. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD001754. An updated Cochrane review which is dedicated to the traditional slings, including bladder neck slings. The study gives a comprehensive knowledge about efficacy and complications of pubovaginal slings.
Zimmern P, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). Design of the SISTEr (Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial) Study: A randomized surgical trial comparing Burch colposuspension and the autologous rectus fascia sling. A clinical trial of the NIH/NIDDK urinary incontinence treatment network (UITN) (Abstract number 81). Progres en Urologie. 2004;14(3 Suppl 3):26. [:19780]
Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55. see comment.
Albo M, Wruck L, Baker J, Brubaker L, Chai T, Dandreo KJ, et al. The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1810–4.
• Chai TC, Albo ME, Richter HE, Norton PA, Dandreo KJ, Kenton K, et al. Complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2192–7. [: 31150]. The paper is dedicated to analysis of all adverse events noticed in the SISTEr study where the patients with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to Burch procedure or fascial bladder neck slings.
• Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, et al. 5-Year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of Burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:1324. Extended follow-up of the SISTEr study participants (E-SISTEr) provides an important view into the long-term results for women who have undergone bladder neck surgery for SUI.
Richter HE, Brubaker L, Stoddard AM, Xu Y, Zyczynski HM, Norton P, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Gormley EA, Kusek JW, Albo ME. Patient related factors associated with long-term urinary continence after burch colposuspension and pubovaginal fascial sling surgeries. J Urol. 2012;188(2):485–9.
Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:399–402.
Maher CF, O'Reilly BA, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter P. Pubovaginal sling versus transurethral Macroplastique for stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112(6):797–801.
Sand PK, Winkler H, Blackhurst DW, Culligan PJ. A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(1 Pt 1):30–4.
Horbach NS, Blanco JS, Ostergard DR, Bent AE, Cornella JL. A polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling procedure for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence in patients with low urethral closure pressure. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:648–52.
Wadie B, Henawy A. Does urethral pressure measurement correlate to the outcome of incontinence surgery? (Abstract number 546). Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ICS, 20-24 Aug 2007, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2007.
Wadie BS, El Hefnawy AS. Urethral pressure measurement in stress incontinence: does it help? Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(3):491–5.
Wang SC, McGuire EJ, Bloom DA. A bladder pressure management system for myelodysplasia-clinical outcome. J Urol. 1988;140:1499.
McGuire EJ, Wang CC, Usitalo H, et al. Modified pubovaginal sling in girls with myelodysplasia. J Urol. 1986;135:94.
Austin P, Westney L, Leng W, Mc GE, Ritchey M. Advances of rectus fascial slings for urinary incontinence in children with neuropathic bladders. J Urol. 2001;165:2369–72.
Perez LM, Smith EA, Broecker BH, et al. Outcome of sling cystourethropexy in the pediatric population: a critical review. J Urol. 1996;156:642.
Nguyen H, Bauer S, Diamond D, Retik A. Rectus fascial sling fort he treatment of neurogenic sphincteric incontinence in boys: is it safe and effective? J Urol. 2011;166:658–61.
Brubaker L, Stoddard A, Richter H, Zimmern P, Moalli P, Kraus SR, et al. Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):268–73.
Osman T. Stress incontinence surgery for patients presenting with mixed incontinence and a normal cystometrogram. BJU Int. 2003;92:964–8.
Guerrero K, Whareham K, Watkins A, Ismail S, Lucas M, Emery S. A randomised control trial comparing TVT, pelvicol and autologous fascial slings for the management of stress urinary incontinence in women (Abstract number 1). Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(7):571.
Lucas M, Emery S, Alan W, Kathy W. Failure of porcine xenograft sling in a randomised controlled trial of three sling materials in surgery for stress incontinence (Abstract). Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International UroGynecological Association, 23-27 August, 2004, Paris. 2004:Abstract number 309.
Amaro JL, Yamamoto HA, Kawano PR, Fugita O, Gameiro MOO, Barros G, et al. A prospective randomized trial of autologous fascial sling (AFS) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (Poster abstract number 1460). J Urol. 2007;177(4 Suppl 4):482.
Sharifiaghdas F, Mortazavi N. Tension-Free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium term follow-up. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17:209–14.
Jeon MJ, Jung HJ, Chung SM, et al. Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:76.e1–e4.
Flisser AJ, Blaivas JG. Outcome of urethral reconstructive surgery in a series of 74 women. J Urol. 2003;169:2246–9.
Petrou SP, Frank I. Complications and initial continence rates after a repeat pubovaginal sling procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2001;165:1979–81.
Migliari R, Pistolesi D, D'Urso L, et al. Recurrent pseudodiverticula of female urethra: five-year experience. Urology. 2009;73:1218–22.
Welk BK, Herschorn S. The autologous fascia pubovaginal sling for complicated female stress incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(1):36–40.
Pushkar DY, Dyakov VV, Kosko JW, Kasyan GR. Management of urethrovaginal fistulas. Eur Urol. 2006;20:873–1128.
Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, et al. Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:521.e1–e6.
Disclosure
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pushkar, D., Kasyan, G. The Bladder Neck Sling: What Role Remains?. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 8, 32–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-012-0166-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-012-0166-3