Surgical Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Opinion statement

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) remains a rare and lethal disease that is directly related to asbestos exposure in the vast majority of cases. While the total number of cases remains low compared to other malignancies, the worldwide incidence is expected to increase over the next twenty years. Currently, survival rates remain dismal and there is no standard therapy or consensus regarding treatment. However, over the last fifteen years there have been substantial improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of MPM, including easier and more accurate diagnostic techniques, improved methods of staging, more effective systemic therapy, a remarkable decrease in operative mortality, marked improvements in local control with adjuvant therapy, and perhaps most important, an emphasis on multidisciplinary care and multimodality clinical trials. Despite these advances, optimal therapy for these patients remains highly controversial and the role of surgery is actively debated. Most controversy centers on whether surgery increases survival and whether a survival benefit is best achieved with extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication within a multimodal regimen. To date, trimodality therapy that includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation offers the best survival advantage. It is generally accepted that the main goals of surgery, within the framework of a multimodality approach, is not only complete resection if possible, but more realistically, the resection of all macroscopic disease as an adjunct to the delivery of chemotherapy and radiation. The surgical options available to obtain this goal include extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). There are no randomized trials directly comparing EPP and P/D and the level of evidence supporting either technique remains low. Ultimately, the choice of operation depends on multiple factors including: disease stage, the patient’s cardiopulmonary reserve, surgeon experience and philosophy, and the extent of planned adjuvant therapy. Yet, despite the inherent biases in most studies, the data thus far illustrates significant survival advantages with both P/D and EPP and surgeons should consider these approaches in select patients.