Skip to main content
Log in

Tacit knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive firms: the perceptions of team members and team leaders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the tacit knowledge sharing (TKS) problem with particular reference to knowledge-intensive firms (KIFs), a topic that deserves consideration given the role of tacit knowledge as a driver of business model innovation. The paper investigates individual perceptions about knowledge sharing (KS) at the team level, analysing the points of view of both team members (TMs) and team leaders (TLs) of an Italian KIF. The awareness of these perceptions represents an important antecedent to gain better TKS and their investigation a perspective that has not been considered by previous studies. The research is based on interviews with company TMs and on surveys through questionnaires submitted to TMs and TLs to investigate their perceptions and attitudes regarding TKS. The results from both show a good KS intention despite low organisational investment in KS tools, lack of time to devote to training and low TM involvement in strategic objectives. It also emerged that the TMs’ perceptions of the charisma of the leader was low. Moreover, the results suggest a low presence of transformational, charismatic and ethical leadership at the base of the so-called knowledge-oriented leader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afsar B, Badir YF, Saeed BB, Hafeez S (2017) Transformational and transactional leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledge–intensive industries. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28(2):307–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgün AE, Keskin H, Kırçovalı SY (2019) Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation. Rev Manag Sci 13(1):57–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand A, Walsh I (2016) Should knowledge be shared generously? Tracing insights from past to present and describing a model. J Knowl Manag 20(4):713–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SD, Tucker RL (1994) Improving project management of design. J Manag Eng 10(4):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio BJ (2002) Examining the full range model of leadership: looking back to transform forward. In: Day D, Zaccarro S, Halpin SM (eds) Leadership development for transforming organizations, 1st edn. Psychology Press, New York, pp 71–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Acad Manag J 49(1):49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch Y, Holtom BC (2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat 61(8):1139–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavik YL, Tang PM, Shao R, Lam LW (2018) Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: exploring dual-mediation paths. Leadersh Q 29(2):322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk RW (2010) Sharing. J Consumer Res 36(5):715–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni M, Johansson C, Larsson TC (2011) Methods and tools for knowledge sharing in product development. In: Monti M (ed) Styling features for industrial. Springer, London, pp 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger AS, Smith RD (2001) Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. J Knowl Manag 5(1):10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken RB, Kraus S (2013) Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. J Bus Res 66(10):2060–2070

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken RB, Reuschl AJ (2018) Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 12(1):317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken RB, Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N (2019) Knowledge- and innovation-based business models for future growth: digitalized business models and portfolio considerations. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00366-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang AS, Chiu SH (2005) Nature of Engineering consulting projects. J Manag Eng 21(4):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LY, Barnes FB (2007) Relationship between leadership behaviors and knowledge sharing in professional service firms engaged in strategic alliances. J Appl Manag Entrepr 11(2):51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury N (2014) World Wide Web and its journey from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. Int J Computer Sci Inf Technol 5(6):8096–8100

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S (2005) The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. J Manag Issues 17(3):310–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung WWC, Yam AYK, Chan MFS (2004) Networked enterprise: a new business model for global sourcing. Int J Prod Econ 87(3):267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland S, Ellis TJ (2015) Rethinking knowledge sharing barriers: a content analysis of 103 studies. Int J Knowl Manag 11(1):28–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JN (2004) Working groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Manag Sci 50(3):352–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta M, Gupta RK (2009) Innovation in organizations: a review of the role of organizational learning and knowledge management. Glob Bus Rev 10(2):203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1996) Some principles of knowledge management. Strateg Bus 1(2):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1997) Information ecology: mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long DW, Fahey L (2000) Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Acad Manag Exec 14(4):113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Donate MJ, De Pablo JDS (2015) The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. J Bus Res 68(2):360–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: how far have we come, and where should we go? J Manag 43(1):200–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Fteimi N, Lehner F (2016) Main research topics in knowledge management: a content analysis of ECKM Publications. Electron J Knowl Manag 14(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin DA, Edmondson AC, Gino F (2008) Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev 86(3):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • George G, Bock AJ (2011) The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 35(1):83–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Manag J 17(2):109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1997) The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Plan 30(3):450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, Luthans F, Harms PD (2008) Leadership efficacy: review and future directions. Leadersh Q 19(6):669–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney TJ (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv Bus Rev 77(2):106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks P (1999) Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowl Process Manag 6(2):91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst AS (2017) Capturing knowledge from lessons learned at the work package level in project engineering teams. J Knowl Manag 21(4):765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple C, Joshi KD (2000) An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. J Strategic Inf Syst 9(2/3):235–261

    Google Scholar 

  • House RJ (1996) Path-goal theory of leadership: lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadersh Q 7(3):323–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh H, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Q Health Res 15:1277–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M, Rigtering JC, Covin JG, Bouncken RB, Kraus S (2018) Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. Br J Manag 29(4):750–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasimuddin SM, Naqshbandi MM (2017) Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. Int Bus Rev 27(3):701–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harv Bus Rev 86(12):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (2013) Organizational theory, design and change. Pearson Higher Education, Texas A&M University, Essex, England

  • Kathan W, Matzler K, Veider V (2016) The sharing economy: your business model’s friend or foe? Bus Horiz 59(6):663–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan A, Turner JR (2001) Quantity vs quality in project-based learning practices. Manag Learn 32(1):77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • King WR (2008) An integrated architecture for an effective knowledge organisation. J Knowl Manag 12(2):29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki NL, Wellman NS (2002) Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 34(4):224–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Niemand T, Besler M, Stieg P, Martinez-Ciment C (2018) The influence of leadership styles on the internationalisation of ‘born-global’firms and traditionally globalexpanding firms. Eur J Int Manag 12(5/6):554–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N, Bouncken RB (2019) Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 13(3):519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer H, Villamor I, Aguinis H (2019) Innovation leadership: best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Bus Horiz 62(1):65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik CT, Treuren G, Bordia P (2012) Shocks and final straws: using exit-interview data to examine the unfolding model’s decision paths. Hum Resour Manag 51(1):25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar JA, Ganesh LS (2011) Balancing knowledge strategy: codification and personalization during product development. J Knowl Manag 15(1):118–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee P, Gillespie N, Mann L, Wearing A (2010) Leadership and trust: their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Manag Learn 41(4):474–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei D, Slocum JW, Pitts RA (1999) Designing organizations for competitive advantage: the power of learning and unlearning. Organ Dyn 27(3):24–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CP (2010) Learning task effectiveness and social interdependence through the mediating mechanisms of sharing and helping: a survey of online knowledge workers. Group Organ Manag 35(3):299–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ML, Hsieh MW, Hsiao C, Lin CP, Yang C (2018) Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance in technology industry: the main and moderating effects of happiness. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0301-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä O (2015) Integrating business models and knowledge management. Doctoral Dissertations, Aalto University, Helsinki

  • Martins EC, Terblanche F (2003) Building Organizational Culture that Stimulates Creativity and Innovation. Eur J Innov Manag 6(1):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas Machuca M (2014) The role of leadership: the challenge of knowledge management and learning in knowledge-intensive organizations. J Educ Leadersh Manag 2(1):97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott R, O’Dell C (2001) Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. J Knowl Manag 5(1):76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Michailova S, Husted K (2003) Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms. Calif Manag Rev 45(3):59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar CJM, Chen S, Waller L (2017) Leadership, knowledge and people in knowledge-intensive organisations: implications for HRM theory and practice. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28(2):261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J (2012a) Knowledge sharing between project teams and its cultural antecedents. J Knowl Manag 16(3):435–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J (2012b) The interactive relationship of corporate culture and knowledge management: a review. Rev Manag Sci 6(2):182–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J (2015) Formal and informal practices of knowledge sharing between project teams and enacted cultural characteristics. Proj Manag J 46(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev 69:96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R, Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Ind Corp Change 9(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi R (1998) Knowledge-intensive firms. Bus Horiz 41(3):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell C, Grayson CJ (1998) If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):154–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JG, Lee J (2014) Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: explicating the role of dependence and trust. Int J Proj Manag 32(1):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1975) Personal Knowledge. In: Polanyi M, Prosch H (eds) Meaning, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 22–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst G, Raub S, Rombhardt K (2000) Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Riege A (2005) Three dozen knowledge sharing barriers managers must consider. J Knowl Manag 9(3):18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagie A, Zaidman N, Amichai-Hamburger Y, Te’eni D, Schwartz N (2002) An empirical assessment of the loose-tight leadership model: quantitative and qualitative analyses. J Organ Behav 23(3):303–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana J (2009) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao Z, Feng Y, Wang T, Liu L (2016) The impact mechanism of charismatic leadership on individual’s tacit knowledge sharing. AIS Electronic Library. https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2016/7. Accessed 11 July 2016

  • Silverman D (2011) Interpreting qualitative data. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Gupta S, Busso D, Kamboj S (2019) Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D (1999) Why people hoard knowledge: to get them to share it. You’ve got to overcome a lot of history. Across Board 36(8):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemler S (2001) An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 7(17):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark D (2002) The relationship between information and knowledge and the role of IT in knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 4, pp 104–112

  • Suh T, Khan OJ, Schnellbächer B, Heidenreich S (2020) Strategic accord and tension for business model innovation: Examining different tacit knowledge types and open action strategies. Int J Innov Manag. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500395 (Forthcoming)

  • Suppiah V, Singh Sandhu M (2011) Organisational culture’s influence on tacit knowledge-sharing behavior. J Knowl Manag 15(3):462–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby KE, Simons R (2002) Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work. J Knowl Manag 6(5):420–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart J, Kinnie N (2003) Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firms. Hum Resour Manag J 13(2):60–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43(2):172–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra V, David K (1991) The cultural environment of international business. South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Tianyushan (2014) Research on the framework of tire enterprises tacit knowledge management based on web 3.0. J Chem Pharm Res 6(2):67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng SM (2017) Investigating the moderating effects of organizational culture and leadership style on IT-adoption and knowledge-sharing intention. J Enterp Inf Manag 30(4):583–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Walesh SG (2013) Create, use, and continuously improve written guidance for repetitive tasks and processes. Leadersh Manag Eng 13(2):109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WT, Wei ZH (2011) Knowledge sharing in wiki communities: an empirical study. Online Inf Rev 35(5):799–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams T (2008) How do organizations learn lessons from projects – and do they? IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(2):248–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Yu WD, Tseng JCR, Chang CS (2014) Benefit analysis of knowledge management system for engineering consulting firms. J Manag Eng 30(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out with the support of the research project entitled “#BIT, Business Innovation & digital Transformation” promoted by the Polo Scientifico Didattico Studi sull’Impresa in Vicenza (University of Verona).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Castellani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Table 4.

Table 4 TM questionnaire items and related references. Source: our elaboration

Appendix B

See Table 5.

Table 5 TL questionnaire items and related references. Source: our elaboration

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castellani, P., Rossato, C., Giaretta, E. et al. Tacit knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive firms: the perceptions of team members and team leaders. Rev Manag Sci 15, 125–155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00368-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00368-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation