Abstract
The modifying effect of sucrose on GDH activity and isoenzyme pattern in isolated embryos of lupine subjected to treatments with inhibitors of RNA synthesis (transcription inhibitors: actinomycin D and cordycepin) and protein synthesis (cycloheximide and chloramphenicol) was investigated. Sucrose starvation of embryos caused the increase of total activity of GDH(NADH-GDH and NAD-GDH) more than twice. Supply of sucrose to sucrose starved embryos caused a reduction of enzyme activity by 40 %. Electrophoretic analysis showed the presence of ca 17 isoenzymes of glutamate dehydrogenase in embryos grown for 72 h in medium with sucrose, while sucrose starvation increased the number of isoenzymes up to 22 forms. Addition of sucrose to sucrose starved embryos after 24 h of cultivation caused the inhibition of synthesis of new isoenzymes. This down-regulation by sucrose was blocked when sucrose was added together with cycloheximide, CHX, (0.025 mM). Treatment of sucrose fed and sucrose starved embryos with cycloheximide (0.020 mM) inhibited protein synthesis by 58 % and 24 %, respectively. The addition of cycloheximide (0.025 mM) to sucrose starved embryos decreased by 60 % NADH-GDH and by 30 % NAD-GDH activity and reduced the spectrum of isoenzymes. CHX treatment did not lead to a significant reduction of enzyme activity and isoenzyme pattern in sucrose fed embryos. The chloramphenicol (CMP) treatment (1 mM) stimulated the total GDH activity, 2.5 fold and 1.5 fold, in sucrose fed and sucrose starved embryos, respectively. Addition of CMP (10 mM) to the media did not affect GDH activity. Both concentrations of CMP caused no significant changes in the isoenzymatic pattern of enzyme in sucrose starved embryos, but induction of new isoenzymes was observed in sucrose fed embryos treated with CMP. In the case of using RNA synthesis inhibitors only cordycepin inhibited the total GDH activity (by ca 25 %) but neither actinomycin D or cordycepin caused any changes in isoenzyme pattern of GDH. The possible mechanism of sugar-mediated regulation of GDH activity is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GDH:
-
glutamate dehydrogenase
- NADH-GDH:
-
amination activity of glutamate dehydrogenase
- NAD-GDH:
-
deamination activity of glutamate dehydrogenase
- CHX:
-
cyclohexmide
- Act. D:
-
actinomycin D
- CMP:
-
chloramphenicol
References
Atkin O.K., Zhang Q., Wiskich J. 2002. Effect of temperature on rates of alternative and cytochrome pathway respiration and their relationship with the redox poise of the quinone pool. Plant. Physiol. 128: 212–222.
Bradford M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254.
Britton K.L., Baker P.J., Rice D.W., Stillman T.J. 1992. Structural relationship between the hexameric and tetrameric family of glutamate dehydrogenase. Eur. J. Biochem. 209: 851–859.
Brouquisse R., Gaudillere J.P., Raymond P. 1998. Induction of a carbon-starvation-related proteolysis in whole maize plants submitted to light/dark cycles and to extended darkness. Plant Physiol. 117: 1281–1291.
Cammaerts D., Jacobs M. 1985. A study of the role of glutamate dehydrogenase in the nitrogen metabolism of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 163: 517–526.
Cheng C.L., Acedo G.N., Gristism M., Concling M.A. 1992. Sucrose mimics the light induction of Arabidopsis nitrate reductase gene transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 1861–1864.
Chevalier C., Bourgeois E., Pradet A., Raymond P. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterization of six cDNAs expressed during glucose starvation in excised maize (Zea mays L.) root tips. Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 473–485.
Chung B-C., Lee S.Y., Oh S.A., Rhew T.H. Nam, H.G., Lee C-H. 1997. The promotor activity of sen 1, a senecsence-associated gene of Arabidopsis, is repressed by sugars. J. Plant Physiol. 151: 337–345.
Czosnowski J. 1974. Metabolism of excised embryos of Lupinus luteus L. An electrophoretic analysis of some dehydrogenases in cultured embryos as compared with the normal seedling axes. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 43: 117–127.
Dieuaide M., Couee I., Pradet A., Raymond P., 1992. Increased fatty acid β-oxidation after glucose starvation in maize root tips. Plant Physiol. 99: 595–600.
Edwards D.L., Rosenberg E. & Maroney P.A. 1974. Induction of cyanide-insensitive respiration in Neurospora crassa. J. Bioch. Chem. 249: 355–3556.
Ficcarelli A., Tassi F., Restivo F.M. 1999. Isolation and characterization of two cDNA clones encoding for glutamate dehydrogenase in Nicotina plumbaginifolia. Plant Cell Physiol. 40: 339–342.
Fox G.G., Ratcliffe R.G., Robinson S.A., Stewart G.R. 1995. Evidence for deamination of glutamate dehydrogenase in higher plants: commentary. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1112–1115.
Gancedo J.M. 1998. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 334–361.
Graham A., Derby K.J., Leaver C.J. 1994. Carbon catabolite repression regulates glyoxylate cycle gene expression in cucumber. Plant Cell 6: 761–772.
Heller R. 1954. Recherches sur la nutrition minerale des tissus vegetaux cultives in vitro. Ann. Sc. Nat. Biol. Veg. 14, 1–223.
James F., Brouquisse R., Pradet A., Raymond P. 1993. Changes in proteolytic activities in glucose-starved maize root tips. Regulation by sugars. Plant Pysiol. Biochem. 31: 845–856.
Jang J-C., Sheen J. 1997. Sugar senescing in higher plants. Trends Plant Science 2: 208–214.
Koch K.E. 1996. Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Mol. Biol. 47: 509–540.
Kwinta J., Bartoszewicz K., Bielawski W. 2001. Purification and characteristics of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) from triticale roots. Acta Physiol. Plant. 23: 399–405.
Laemmli U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly by the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685.
Lauriere C., Daussant J. 1983. Identification of ammonia-dependent isoenzyme of glutamate dehydrogenase as the form induced by senescence or darkness in the first leaf of weat. Physiol. Plant. 58: 89–92.
Loulakakis K., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. 1990. Intercellular localization and propertis of NADH-glutamate dehydrogenase from Vitis vinifera L. Plant Physiol. 94: 109–113.
Loulakakis K., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. 1991. Plant NAD(H)-glutamate dehydrogenase consists of two subunit polypeptides and their participation in the seven isoenzymes occures in an ordered ratio. Plant Physiol. 97: 104–111.
Loulakakis K., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. 1996. The seven NAD(H)-glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzymes exhibit similar anabolic and catabolic activities. Plant Physiol. 96: 29–35.
Maestri E., Restivo F.M., Gulli M., Tassi I. 1991. Glutamate dehydrogenase regulation in callus cultures of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia: effect of glucose feeding and carbon source starvation of the isoezymatic pattern. Plant, Cell Environm. 14: 613–618.
Mans R.J., Novelli G.D. 1961. Measurment of the incorporation of radioactive amino acids into protein by a filter-paper disc methods. Arch. Biochem. Biophysis. 94: 48–53.
Melo-Oliveira R., Oliveira I.C., Coruzzi G. 1996. Arabidopsis mutant analysis and gene regulation define a nonredundant role for glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 14(93): 4718–4723.
Morkunas I., Lehmann T., Ratajczak W., Ratajczak L., Tomaszewska B. 2000. The involvemnent of glutamate dehydrogenase in the adaptation of mitochondria to oxidize glutamate in sucrose starved pea embryos. Acta Physiol. Plant. 22: 389–394.
Morohashi Y., Seto T., Matsushima 1991. Appearance of alternative respiration in cucumber cotyledon mitochondria after treatment with cycloheximide. Physiol. Plant. 83: 640–646.
Nishimura M., Douce R. and Akazawa T. 1982. Isolation and characterization of metabolically competent mitochondria from spinach leaves protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 69: 916–920.
Nooden L. D., Guiamet J.J., John J. 1997. Senescence mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 101: 746–753
Pahlich E., Gerlitz C. 1980. Deviation from Michaelis-Menten behaviour of plant glutamate dehydrogenase with ammonium as variable substrate. Phytochemistry 19: 11–13.
Pego J. V., Kortshtee A.J., Huijser C., Smeekens S. 2000. Photosynthesis, sugar and the regulation of gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 407–416.
Prata R.T.N., Williamson J.D., Conkling M.A., Pharr D.M. 1997. Sugar repression of mannitol dehydrogenase activity in celery cells. Plant Physiol. 114: 307–314.
Purcell P.C., Smith A.M., Halford N.G. 1998. Antisense expression of a sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase sequence in tubers and loss of sucrose-inducibility of sucrose synthase transcripts in leaves. Plant J. 14: 195–202.
Purnell M., Stewart G., Botella J. 1997. Cloning and characterization of glutamate dehydrogenase cDNA from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Gene 186: 249–254.
Ratajczak L., Koroniak D., Mazurowa H., Ratajczak W., Prus-Głowacki W. 1986. Glutamate dehydrogenase isoforms in lupine roots and root nodules. Immunochemical studies. Physiol. Plant. 67: 685–689.
Ratajczak L., Ratajczak W., Koroniak D., Przybylska M., Mazurowa H. 1988. Glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in yellow lupine root nodules. II. Subunit composition. Acta Physiol. Plant. 10: 49–55.
Ratajczak L., Ratajczak W., Mazurowa H. 1981. The effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on the activity of glutamine synthase and glutamate dehydrogenase in lupine embryonic axes. Physiol. Plant. 51: 277–280.
Ratajczak L., Prus-Głowacki W., Ratajczak W., Lehmann T. 1989. Immunochemical comparison of the glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in yellow lupin root nodules. Acta Biochem. Pol. 36: 285–293.
Robinson S.A., Stewart G.R. and Phillips R. 1992. Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase activity in relation to carbon limitation and protein catabolism in carrot cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 98: 1190–1195.
Rolland F., Winderickx., Thevelein J. 2001. Glucose-sensing mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. Trends Bioch. Sci. 26: 310–317.
Saier M. 1989. Protein phosphorylation and allosteric control of inducer exclusion and catabolite repression by the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phophotransferase system. Microbiol. Rev. 53: 109–120.
Sakakibara H., Fujii K., Sugiyama T. 1995. Isolation and characterization of cDNA that encodes maize glutamate dehydrogenase. Plant Cell Physiol. 36: 789–797.
Sheen J., Zhou L., Jang J. 1999. Sugars as signaling moleculs. Curr. Op. Plant Biol. 2: 410–418.
Smeekens S. 1998. Sugar regulation of gene expression in plants. Curr. Op. Plant. Biol. 1: 230–234.
Smeekens S., Rook F. 1997. Sugar sensing and sugar-mediated signal transduction in plants. Plant Physiol. 115: 7–13.
Srivastava H.S., Shing R.P. 1987. Role and regulation of L-glutamate dehydrogenase activity in higher plants. Phytochemistry 26: 597–610.
Tassi F., Maestri E., Restivo F. M., Marminoli N. 1992. The effects of carbon starvation on cellular metabolism and protein and RNA synthesis in Gerbera callus cultures. Plant. Sci. 83: 127–136.
Thomas H. 1978. Enzymes of nitrogen mobilization in detached leaves of Lolium temulentum during senescence. Planta 142: 161–169.
Turano F., Thakkar S.S., Fang T., Weismann J., 1997. Characterization and expression of NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenzse genes in Arabidopsis. Plant. Physiol. 113: 1329–1341.
Watanabe M., Nakayama H., Watanabe Y., Shimada N. 1992. Induction of a specific isoenzyme of glutamate dehydrogenase during isolation and the first 48 h of culture of Brassica napus leaf protoplasts. Physiol. Plant. 86: 231–235.
Yamaya T., Oaks A., Rhodes D., Matsumoto H. 1986. Synthesis of (15N)glutamate from (15N)H4 and (15N)glycine by mitochondria isolated from pea and corn shoots. Plant Physiol. 81: 754–757.
Yu S-M. 1999. Cellular and genetic response of plants to sugar starvation. Plant Physiol. 121: 687–693.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehmann, T., Ratajczak, L., Deckert, J. et al. The modifying effect of sucrose on glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity in lupine embryos treated with inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis. Acta Physiol Plant 25, 325–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-003-0013-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-003-0013-4