Literatur
Aalst, W.; Kumar, A.: XML-Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow. In: Information Systems Research 14 (2003) 1, S. 23–46.
Banville, C.; Landry, M.: Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined. In: Galliers, R. (Hrsg.): Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Bd. 1992. Balckwell, London et al. 1992, S. 61–88.
Bennis, W.G.; O’Toole, J.: How Business Schools Lost Their Way. In: Harvard Business Review (2005) May, S. 96-104.
Benbasat, I.; Zmud, R.W.: The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties. In: MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 2, S. 183–194.
Broy, M.; Schmidt, J.W.: Informatik: Grundlagenwissenschaft oder Ingenieurdisziplin? (Zur Diskussion Gestellt). In: Informatik Spektrum 22 (1999) 3, S. 206–209.
Farhoomand, A.F.: Scientific Progress of Management Information Systems. In: Galliers, R. (Hrsg.): Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines. Blackwell, London et al. 1992, S. 28–60.
Frank, U.: Für Sie gelesen: IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise or Serial Hypocrisy? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 45 (2003) 3, S. 354–357.
Gavish, B.; Gerdes, J.: Anonymous mechanisms in Group Decision Support Systems Communication. In: 23 4 (1998) 297-328.
GI;WKWI: Rahmenempfehlung für die Universitätsausbildung in Wirtschaftsinformatik. Techn. Ber., Gesellschaft für Informatik, Wissenschaftliche Kommission Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2003.
Glass, R.L.: Rigor vs. Relevance: A Practitioner’s Eye View of An Explosion of Opinions. In: Communication of the AIS 6 (2001) 2.
Hevner, A.R.; March, S.T.; Park, J. et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. In: MIS Quarterly 28 (2004) 1, S. 75–105.
Jennex, M.E.: Research Relevance-You Get What You Reward. In: Communication of the AIS 6 (2001).
Khazanchi, D.; Munkvold, B.E.: Is Information Systems a Science? An Inquiry into the Nature of the Information Systems Discipline. In: The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 31 (2000) 3, S. 24–42.
Kock, N.; Gray, P.; Hoving, R. et al.: IS Research Relevance Revisited:Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? In: Communication of the AIS 8 (2002), S. 330–346.
Markus, M.L.; Majchrazak, A.; Gasser, L.: A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes. In: MIS Quarterly 26 (2002) 3, S. 179–212.
March, S.T.; Smith, G.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. In: Decision Support Systems 15 (1995) 4, S. 251–266.
Mertens, P.: Wirtschaftsinformatik-Von den Moden zum Trend. In: König, W. (Hrsg.): Wirtschaftsinformatik’ 95 1995.
Nunamaker, J.; Chen, M.; Purdin, T.: Systems development in Information systems research. In: Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (1991) 3, S. 89–106.
Schinzel, B.: Be-Deutungen der Informatik als Ingenieurswissenschaft. In: Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie (2001) 3, S. 27–41.
Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. 3. Aufl., MIT Press 1996.
Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Information Systems Research 11 (2000) 4, S. 342–365.
Zmud, R.W.: Editor’s Comments. In: MIS Quarterly 21 (1997) 2, S. xxi–xxii.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bichler, M. Design science in information systems research. Wirtsch. Inform. 48, 133–135 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-006-0028-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-006-0028-8