Skip to main content
Log in

Activity and safety of erlotinib as second- and third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Targeted Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Efficacy of this drug was documented in the BR.21 trial showing that adenocarcinoma, female gender, Asian ethnicity and never-smoker status are predictive of clinical response to erlotinib. Retrospective studies documented the same benefits for elderly patients as young patients in terms of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The primary aim of our trial was to confirm these findings in a prospective way; the secondary aim was to identify if the aforementioned clinical characteristics may be predictive of response even in elderly patients. The trial included 31 patients with pretreated stage IIIB (2) and IV (29) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Median age was 75 years (range: 65–85). Twenty-seven patients were current/former-smokers and four never-smokers. Twenty-three patients are evaluable for response. Objective response rates were reported in five patients (16%). Five patients had stable disease (16%) and 13 progressive disease (43%). Seven patients had a “clinical benefit” from erlotinib (22.5%; 95% C.I.: 7.9–37.2%). Grade 3 skin rash was recorded in three patients (10%). Median survival was 9 months (range 1–30). Median time to progression was 3 months (range: 1–24 months). Our study confirmed erlotinib activity and safety as second- and third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, especially in terms of median survival. Even though this trial does not allow us to draw a definitive conclusion about the role of a particular clinical characteristic predictive of response, the “clinical benefit” was documented especially in females, in patients with adenocarcinoma histology and skin rash, confirming previous retrospective data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2007) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (1999) Under-representation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341:2061–2067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP et al (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21:1383–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group (1999) Effects of Minorenne on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C et al (2003) Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:362–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of doxetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18:2095–2103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr R et al (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2354–2362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Ciuleanu T et al (2005) Erlotinib in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T et al (2008) Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small cell-lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet 372(9652):1809–1818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wheatley-Price P, Ding K, Seymour L et al (2008) Erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study Br. 21. J Clin Oncol 26:2350–2357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perng RP, Yang CH, Chang GC et al (2008) High efficacy of erlotinib in Taiwanese NSCLC patients in an expanded access program study previously treated with chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 62:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M et al (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gridelli C, Maione P, Illiano A et al (2007) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the MILES-2P studies. J Clin Oncol 25:4663–4669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lilenbaum RC, Herndon JE 2nd, List MA et al (2005) Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (study 9730). J Clin Oncol 23:190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gridelli C, Shepherd FA (2005) Chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the evidence. Chest 128:947–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asmis T, Ding K, Shepherd F et al (2005) Are age and co-morbidity prognostic factors in the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) randomized trial. Lung Cancer 49:S85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss GJ, Langer C, Rosell R et al (2006) Elderly patients benefit from from second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy: a subset analysis of a randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed compared with docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4405–4411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3543–3551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olayioye MA, Neve RM, Lane HA et al (2000) The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimerization in development and cancer. EMBO J 19:3159–3167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No funds were received in support of this study and no benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related to the subject of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Rossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossi, D., Dennetta, D., Ugolini, M. et al. Activity and safety of erlotinib as second- and third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. Targ Oncol 5, 231–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-010-0163-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-010-0163-4

Keywords

Navigation