Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring Identity Processes in Family Relational Empowerment

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines a procedure for measuring personal identity that uses self-characterisations to elicit and integrate ideographic data for fixed construct repertory grid nomothetic applications. There is a focus on how family members view their personal identities when they are recovering from the impacts of having a ‘loved one’ with a mental illness and/or substance used disorder. The unique nature of personal and relational empowerment journeys necessitates the use of an ideographic approach to capture changes in personal identity. A significant research implication for this procedure is that the consistent meaning generated through this initially ideographic approach can then be used to explore changes in identity across larger populations. The clinical implications include having a phenomenological framework upon which care plans that include a focus on identity processes can be individually tailored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. B. (2004). Athletic identity and its relation to exercise behavior: scale development and initial validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balistreri, E., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Development and preliminary validation of the ego identity process questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 179–192. doi:10.1006/jado.1995.1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beail, N. (1985). An introduction to repertory grid technique. In N. Beail (Ed.), Repertory Grid Technique and Personal Constructs: Applications in clinical and educational settings (pp. 1–24). Kent: Croom Helm Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Weger, M., Rubio, D. M., & Tebb, S. S. (2001). Strengths-based practice with family caregivers of the chronically ill: Qualtitative insights. Families in Society, 82(3), 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Lewis, V. (1999). The Alcoholic Family in Recovery: A Developmental Model. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Walker, K., Crowe, T., & Caputi, P. (2010). Exploring identity within the recovery process of people with chronic mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilition Journal, 33(3), 219–227. doi:10.2975/33.3.2010.219.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, E. (1981). Techniques for exploring constructs. In E. Button (Ed.), Personal construct theory and mental health: Theory, research and practice (pp. 31–56). London: Croom Helm Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, L. G., Conoley, C. W., Brossart, D. F., & Quiros, A. E. (2007). Construction and validation of the intragroup marginalization inventory. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(3), 232–240. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.3.232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, T. K. J. (2008). Recovery: say what you mean and mean what you say. Journal of Mental Health, 17(2), 125–128. doi:10.1080/09638230802003800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34, 230–255. doi:10.1159/000277058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., Andres-Hyman, R., Bedregal, L., Tondora, J., Fry, J., & Kirk, T. A., Jr. (2008). From “double trouble” to “dual recovery”: Integrating models of recovery in addiction and mental health. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 4(3), 273–290. doi:10.1080/15504260802072396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feixas, G. (2011, 3/08/2011). [Personal communication].

  • Feixas, G., Geldschlager, H., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2002). Content analysis of personal constructs. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 1–19. doi:10.1080/107205302753305692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransella, F. (1981). Individual psychotherapy. In E. Button (Ed.), Personal Construct Theory and Mental Health: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 277–301). London: Croom Helm Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2nd ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghodse, A. H., & Galea, S. (2005). Families of people with drug abuse. In N. Satorius, J. Leff, J. J. Lopez-Ibor, M. Maj, & A. Okasha (Eds.), Families and Mental Disorders: From Burden to Empowerment (pp. 161–193). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, D. A., & Tanarugsachock, V. (2000). Mental illness, caregiving, and emotion management. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 6–25. doi:10.1177/104973200129118219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955a). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1). New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Research, 43, 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielhofner, G., Mallinson, T., Forsyth, K., & Lai, J.-S. (2001). Psychometric properties of the second version of the occupational performance history interview (OPHI-II). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 260–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, H., & Land Henderson, V. (Eds.). (1989). The Carl Rogers reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J. M. M. (1977). The community of self. In D. Bannister (Ed.), New perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 125–149). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1958). Contribution of existential psychotherapy. In R. May, E. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology (pp. 37–91). New York: Basic Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, P. J., & Nortcott, H. C. (2003). Redefining parental identity: caregiving and schizophrenia. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 100–110. doi:10.1177/1049732302239413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muhlbauer, S. A. (2002). Navigating the storm of mental illness: phases in the famiy’s journey. Qualitative Health Research, 12(8), 1076–1092. doi:10.1177/104973202129120458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Needle, R., Su, S., Doherty, W., Laveey, Y., & Brown, P. (1988). Familial, interpersonal, and intrapersonal correlates of drug use: A longitudinal comparison of adolescents in treatment, drug-using adolescents not in treatment, and non-drug-using adolescents. The International Journal of the Addictions, 23(12), 1211–1240. doi:10.3109/10826088809058854.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, G. J., Bowman, J. Z., & Saferstein, J. (2005). The effects of elcitation techniques on repertory grid outcomes: Difference, opposite, and contrast methods. Journal of Contructivist Psychology, 18(3), 237–252. doi:10.1080/10720530590948791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, S. E., & Horberg, L. K. (1994). The “Taking Charge” model of recovery for addictive families. In J. A. Lewis (Ed.), Addictions: Concepts and Strategies for Treatment (pp. 233–251). Gaithersburg: Aspen Publisher, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. M., & Winter, D. (2007). The elaboration of personal construct psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 453–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, J. (2009). The existentialism of Jean-Paul Sarte Retrieved from http://www.uow.eblib.com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=380863&userid=rmCeCbcJrD4%3d&tstamp=1303088678&id=036003C038378C59F48250BEA729980DCE07359A

  • Worthington, R. L., Navarro, R. L., Savoy, H. B., & Hampton, D. (2008). Development, reliability, and validity of the measure of sexual identity exploration and commitment (MoSIEC). Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 22–33. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

PhD Scholarship from the Salvation Army, NSW, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kellie Buckley-Walker.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 2 An example of a repertory grid with constructs identified with CSPC

Appendix B

Self-Characterisation

Self as I am Now

Male Example:

I want you to write a character sketch of yourself (Harry Brown), as you are now, just as if he were the principal character in a play. Write it as it might be written by a friend who knew him very intimately and very sympathetically, perhaps better than anyone ever really could know him. Be sure to write it in the third person. For example, start out by saying, ‘Harry Brown is….’

Preferred Self—how you ‘would like to be’

Female Example:

I want you to write a character sketch of yourself (Sally Brown), as you prefer to be, just as if she were the principal character in a play. Write it as it might be written by a friend who knew her very intimately and very sympathetically, perhaps better than anyone ever really could know her. Be sure to write it in the third person. For example, start out by saying, ‘Sally Brown is….’

After completion of the self-characterisation the interviewer along with the participant will go through the script and identify relevant constructs (emergent pole). The interviewer will then ask the participant “To you, being (emergent pole) would contrast with someone who is …..?”, this then generates the contrast pole.

The emergent and contrast pole will form one construct, which will then be used in the Repertory Grid for the participants to complete.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckley-Walker, K., Crowe, T.P. & Caputi, P. Measuring Identity Processes in Family Relational Empowerment. Int J Ment Health Addiction 11, 358–368 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-012-9420-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-012-9420-3

Keywords

Navigation