Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young people’s interaction online is rapidly increasing, which enables new spaces for communication; the impact on learning, however, is not yet acknowledged in education. The aim of this exploratory case study is to scrutinize how students frame their interaction in social networking sites (SNS) in school practices and what that implies for educational language teaching and learning practices. Analytically, the study departs from a sociocultural perspective on learning, and adopts conceptual distinctions of frame analysis. The results based on ethnographic data from a Facebook group in English-learning classes, with 60 students aged between 13 and 16 from Colombia, Finland, Sweden and Taiwan indicate that there is a possibility for boundary crossing, which could generate extended spaces for collaborative language-learning activities in educational contexts where students combine their school subject of learning language and their communicative use of language in their everyday life. Such extended spaces are, however, difficult to maintain and have to be recurrently negotiated. To take advantage of young people’s various dynamic communicative uses of language in their everyday life in social media, the implementation of such media for educational purposes has to be deliberately, collaboratively and dynamically negotiated by educators and students to form a new language-learning space with its own potentials and constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first 18 postings do not get any comments at all.

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y. H., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploring the motivation of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Socialnetwork, 15(6), 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, G., & Lomicka, L. (2012). Facebook-ing and the social generation: A new era of language learning. Alsic, 15(1), http://alsic.revues.org/2413.

  • Bonderup Dohn, N. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In I. D. Buckingham (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2006). Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between language: Learning from multilingual writers. College English, 68(6), 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. York: HEA Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirksen, V., Huizing, A., & Smit, B. (2010). “Piling on layers of understanding”: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1045–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (2008). Leisure is hard work: Digital practices and future competencies. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 167–184). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, M. A. (2011). College students’ text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959/1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974/1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K., Cheng, A., & Carlson, M. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 220–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994/2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R. G., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C., A’Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language, Learning and Technology, 4(2), 78–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Wohn, D., Vitak, J., Ellison, N., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, C., & Branaman, A. (Eds.). (2005). The Goffman reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen, S., Pitkänen-Huhta, A., Piirainen-Marsh, A., Nikula, T., & Peuronen, S. (2009). Young people’s translocal new media uses: A multiperspective analysis of language choice and heteroglossia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1080–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: Mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S. R., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., Säljö, R. (Eds.) (2010). Introduction. Learning across sites. New tools, infrastructures and practices. London, UK: Routledge.

  • McBride, K. (2009). Social-networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for re-creation. I. L. Lomicka, & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. CALICO Monograph Series Volume 8. San Marcos, Texas: CALICO.

  • Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. W. (2011). English around the world. An introduction. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford, UK: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language, Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2009). ‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity. Language Teaching, 42(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1939/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., Black, R. W., & Chou, Y.-L. (2010). Online Englishes. In A. Kirpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (pp. s 490–505). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(1), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A., Lewis, J., & Currie, P. (2009). Students’ Facebook ‘friends’: Public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2013). Language economy in computer-mediated communication: Learner autonomy in a community of practice. In B. Zou, M. Xing, Y. Wang, M. Sun, & C. H. Xiang (Eds.), Computer-assisted foreign language teaching and learning: Technological advances (pp. 75–90). Hershey: USA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y.-F. (2011). Learner interpretations of shared space in multilateral English blogging. Language, Learning and Technology, 15(1), 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported here was funded by Marcus and Amelia Foundation and conducted within the University of Gothenburg Learning and Media Technology Studio (LETStudio), and the Linnaeus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society (LinCS). We wish to convey our thanks to the anonymous reviewers and Gerry Stahl for their invaluable comments on a former version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Lantz-Andersson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S. & Bowen, R. Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. Computer Supported Learning 8, 293–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9177-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9177-0

Keywords

Navigation