Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing chemical-enhanced washing and waste-based stabilisation approach for soil remediation

  • SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chemical-enhanced soil washing (with chelating agents, humic substances and inorganic acids) and soil stabilisation by inorganic industrial by-products (coal fly ash, acid mine drainage sludge and zero-valent iron) and organic resource (lignite) for timber treatment site remediation.

Materials and methods

Both remediation options were assessed in terms of extraction/leaching kinetics and residual leachability (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, TCLP) of the major risk drivers, i.e. Cu and As.

Results and discussion

In chemical-enhanced soil washing, chelating agents only minimised the Cu leachability. Humic substances were ineffective while inorganic acids reduced the As leachability to the detriment of the soil quality. For the waste-stabilised soil, the short-term leaching potential (72 h) and long-term TCLP leachability (9 months) revealed that Fe-/Al-/Ca-rich AMD sludge and coal fly ash sequestered As through adsorption and (co-)precipitation, while carbonaceous lignite stabilised Cu with oxygen-containing functional groups. The short-term and long-term leaching of Cu and As into the soil solution was negligible in the presence of the waste materials. However, the waste-stabilised soil did not maintain sufficient Cu stability in the TCLP tests, in which acetate buffer induced significant mineral dissolution of the waste materials.

Conclusions

These results suggest that chelant-enhanced washing (significant reduction of Cu leachability) may be augmented with subsequent stabilisation with inorganic waste materials (effective control of As leachability), thus minimising the environmental risks of both Cu (heavy metal) and As (metalloid) while preserving the reuse value of the soil. Additional tests under field-relevant conditions are required to provide a holistic performance evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X, Mohan D, Sung JK, Yang JE, Ok YS (2012) Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresource Technol 118:536–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almaroai YA, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Kim KR, Vithanage M, Ok YS (2013) Role of chelating agents on release kinetics of metals and their uptake by maize from chromated copper arsenate-contaminated soil. Environ Technol 34:747–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R, Rasor E, Van Ryn F (1999) Particle size separation via soil washing to obtain volume reduction. J Hazard Mater 66:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arwidsson Z, Elgh-Dalgren K, von Kronhelm T, Sjoberg R, Allard B, van Hees P (2010) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil washing residues with amino polycarboxylic acids. J Hazard Mater 173:697–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baken S, Degryse F, Verheyen L, Merckx R, Smolders E (2011) Metal complexation properties of freshwater dissolved organic matter are explained by its aromaticity and by anthropogenic ligands. Environ Sci Technol 45:2584–2590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Begum ZA, Rahman IMM, Tate Y, Sawai H, Maki T, Hasegawa H (2012) Remediation of toxic metal contaminated soil by washing with biodegradable aminopolycarboxylate chelants. Chemosphere 87:1161–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL, Compton H, Basta NT (2007) Field test of in situ soil amendments at the Tar Creek National Priorities List Superfund Site. J Environ Qual 36:1627–1634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste

  • Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, Richer-Lafleche M (2008) Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J Hazard Mater 152:1–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas L (2009) Olympic Watch—the main site. Engineering and Technology Magazine, The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, 6, 4

  • Fedje KK, Yillin L, Stromvall AM (2013) Remediation of metal polluted hotspot areas through enhanced soil washing—evaluation of leaching methods. J Environ Manage 128:489–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Caliani JC, Barba-Brioso C (2010) Metal immobilization in hazardous contaminated minesoils after marble slurry waste application. A field assessment at the Tharsis mining district (Spain). J Hazard Mater 181:817–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harbottle MJ, Al-Tabbaa A, Evans CW (2007) A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill. J Hazard Mater 141:430–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Puschenreiter M, Oburger E, Santner J, Wenzel WW (2012) Sulfur-aided phytoextraction of Cd and Zn by Salix smithiana combined with in situ metal immobilization by gravel sludge and red mud. Environ Pollut 170:222–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jelusic M, Grcman H, Vodnik D, Suhadolc M, Lestan D (2013) Functioning of metal contaminated garden soil after remediation. Environ Pollut 174:63–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jucoski GO, Cambraia J, Ribeiro C, Oliveira JA, de Paula SO, Oliva MA (2013) Impact of iron toxicity on oxidative metabolism in young Eugenia uniflora L. plants. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1645–1657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodynska D (2010) The effect of the novel complexing agent in removal of heavy metal ions from waters and waste waters. Chem Eng J 165:835–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komarek M, Vanek A, Mrnka L, Sudova R, Szakova J, Tejnecky V, Chrastny V (2010) Potential and drawbacks of EDDS-enhanced phytoextraction of copper from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 158:2428–2438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komarek M, Michalkova Z, Szakova J, Vanek A, Grygar T (2011) Evolution of bioavailable copper and major soil cations in contaminated soils treated with ethylenediaminedisuccinate: a two-year experiment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:525–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komarek M, Vanek A, Ettler V (2013) Chemical stabilisation of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides—a review. Environ Pollut 172:9–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—a review. Waste Manage 28:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landrot G, Tappero R, Webb SM, Sparks DL (2012) Arsenic and chromium speciation in an urban contaminated soil. Chemosphere 88:1196–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Moon DH, Lee SH, Kim KW, Cheong KH, Park JH, Ok YS, Chang YY (2013) Simultaneous stabilisation of arsenic, lead, and copper in contaminated soil using mixed waste resources. Environ Earth Sci 69(6):1813–1820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CC, Lin YC (2013) Reclamation of copper-contaminated soil using EDTA or citric acid coupled with dissolved organic matter solution extracted from distillery sludge. Environ Pollut 178:97–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo IMC, Tsang DCW, Yip TCM, Wang F, Zhang W (2011) Significance of metal exchange in EDDS-flushing column experiments. Chemosphere 83:7–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann MJ (1999) Full-scale and pilot-scale soil washing. J Hazard Mater 66:119–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milacic R, Zuliani T, Scancar J (2012) Environmental impact of toxic elements in red mud studied by fractionation and speciation procedures. Sci Total Environ 426:359–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miretzky P, Cirelli AF (2010) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils by iron amendments: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40:93–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neugschwandtner R, Tlustos P, Komarek M, Szakova J, Jakoubkova L (2012) Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of risk elements from a contaminated agricultural soil using Zea mays and Triticum aestivum: performance and metal mobilization over a three year period. Int J Phytoremediat 14:754–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack B, Schulin R, Robinson BH (2006) Critical assessment of chelant-enhanced metal phytoextraction. Environ Sci Technol 40:5225–5232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noren K, Loring JS, Bargar JR, Persson P (2009) Adsorption mechanisms of EDTA at the water–iron oxide interface: implications for dissolution. J Phys Chem C 113:7762–7771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ok YS, Kim SC, Kim DK, Skousen JG, Lee JS, Cheong YW, Kim SJ, Yang JE (2011) Ameliorants to immobilize Cd in rice paddy soils contaminated by abandoned metal mines in Korea. Environ Geochem Health 33:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olds WE, Tsang DCW, Weber P (2013) Acid mine drainage treatment assisted by lignite-derived humic substances: metal removal and speciation modelling. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon-Smits EAH, Quinn CF, Tapken W, Malagoli M, Schiavon M (2009) Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:267–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pociecha M, Lestan D (2009) EDTA leaching of Cu contaminated soil using electrochemical treatment of the washing solution. J Hazard Mater 165:533–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez LM, Claassen N, Ubiera AA, Werner H, Moawad AM (2002) Effect of phosphorus, potassium and zinc fertilizers on iron toxicity in wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 239:197–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Szendrak D, Yuen RTW, Hoadley AFA, Mudd G (2011) Application of sludge dewatered products to soil and its effects on the leaching behaviour of heavy metals. Chem Eng J 166:586–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salati S, Quadri G, Tambone F, Adani F (2010) Fresh organic matter of municipal solid waste enhances phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 158:1899–1906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toquer G, Delchet C, Nemec M, Grandjean A (2011) Effect of leaching concentration and time on the morphology of pores in porous glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:1552–1557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trakal L, Komarek M, Szakova J, Tlustos P (2011) Biochar application to metal-contaminated soil: evaluating of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn sorption behavior using single- and multi-element sorption experiment. Plant Soil Environ 57:372–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Zhang W, Lo IMC (2007) Copper extraction effectiveness and soil dissolution issues of EDTA-flushing of artificially contaminated soils. Chemosphere 68:234–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Yip TCM, Lo IMC (2009) Kinetic interactions of EDDS with soils. 2. Metal–EDDS complexes in uncontaminated and metal-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 43:837–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Yip TCM, Lo IMC (2011) Simulation of kinetic extraction of heavy metals during chelant-enhanced soil washing. J Soils Sediments 11:1221–1233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Lo IMC, Surampalli RY (2012) Design, implementation, and economic/societal considerations of chelant-enhanced soil washing. Chelating Agents for Land Decontamination Technologies. ISBN 978-0-7844-1218-3. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 1–26

  • Tsang DCW, Hartley NR (2013) Metal distribution and spectroscopic analysis after soil washing with chelating agents and humic substances. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2300-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Olds WE, Weber P (2013a) Residual leachability of CCA-contaminated soil after treatment with biodegradable chelating agents and lignite-derived humic substances. J Soils Sediments 13:895–905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang DCW, Olds WE, Weber PA, Yip ACK (2013b) Soil stabilisation using AMD sludge, compost and lignite: TCLP leachability and continuous acid leaching. Chemosphere 93:2839–2847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uchimiya M, Chang SC, Klasson KT (2011) Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: role of oxygen functional groups. J Hazard Mater 190:432–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uchimiya M, Bannon DI, Wartelle LH, Lima IM, Klasson T (2012) Lead retention by broiler litter biochars in small arms range soil: impact of pyrolysis temperature. J Agr Food Chem 60:5035–5044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udovic M, Lestan D (2009) Pb, Zn and Cd mobility, availability and fractionation in aged soil remediated by EDTA leaching. Chemosphere 74:1367–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udovic M, Lestan D (2012) EDTA and HCl leaching of calcareous and acidic soils polluted with potentially toxic metals: remediation efficiency and soil impact. Chemosphere 88:718–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) (2011) Remediation system evaluation—Vineland Chemical Company Superfund Site, Vineland, New Jersey. EPA-542-R-11-007, November 2011

  • Voglar D, Lestan D (2012) Pilot-scale washing of metal contaminated garden soil using EDTA. J Hazard Mater 215–216:32–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voglar D, Lestan D (2013) Pilot-scale washing of Pb, Zn and Cd contaminated soil using EDTA and process water recycling. Chemosphere 91:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YR, Tsang DCW (2013) Effects of solution chemistry on arsenic(V) removal by low-cost adsorbents. J Environ Sci 25:2291–2298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YR, Tsang DCW, Olds WE, Weber PA (2013) Utilizing acid mine drainage sludge and coal fly ash for phosphate removal from dairy wastewater. Environ Technol 34:3177–3182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Switzerland. ISBN 978-92-4-154815-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Luo C, Liu Y, Quan L, Chen Y, Shen Z (2013) Residual effects of EDDS leachates on plants during EDDS-assisted phytoremediation of copper contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 444:263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yip TCM, Yan DYS, Yui MMT, Tsang DCW, Lo IMC (2010a) Heavy metal extraction from an artificially contaminated sandy soil under EDDS deficiency: significance of humic acid and chelant mixture. Chemosphere 80:416–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yip TCM, Tsang DCW, Lo IMC (2010b) Interactions of chelating agents with Pb-goethite at the solid–liquid interface: Pb extraction and re-adsorption. Chemosphere 81:415–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Tsang DCW (2013) Conceptual framework and mathematical model for the transport of metal–chelant complexes during in-situ soil remediation. Chemosphere 91:1281–1288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Tsang DCW, Chen H, Long H (2013) Remediation of an electroplating contaminated soil by EDTA flushing: chromium release and soil dissolution. J Soils Sediments 13:354–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YF, Haynes RJ (2010) Sorption of heavy metals by inorganic and organic components of solid wastes: significance to use of wastes as low-cost adsorbents and immobilizing agents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40:909–977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support from the Foundation for Research Science and Technology Fund (SENZ0901) and the provision of field soil sample from Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

    Daniel C. W. Tsang

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Daniel C. W. Tsang

  3. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

    Alex C. K. Yip

Authors
  1. Daniel C. W. Tsang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex C. K. Yip
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. W. Tsang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ravi Naidu

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 564 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsang, D.C.W., Yip, A.C.K. Comparing chemical-enhanced washing and waste-based stabilisation approach for soil remediation. J Soils Sediments 14, 936–947 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0831-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0831-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation